内科重症患者再喂养综合征的发病率、预测因素和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Surat Tongyoo, Pratya Rawangban, Thummaporn Naorungroj
{"title":"内科重症患者再喂养综合征的发病率、预测因素和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Surat Tongyoo, Pratya Rawangban, Thummaporn Naorungroj","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a life-threatening metabolic derangement occurring when nutrition is reintroduced after prolonged starvation. Limited data exist regarding RFS prevalence, risk factors, and outcome, particularly in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a medical intensive care unit from June 2018 to August 2020. RFS diagnostic criteria from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) were used. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 216 patients, RFS was diagnosed in 22.7% and 27.3% of patients per the NICE and ASPEN criteria, respectively. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between patients with and without RFS (22/59 [37.3%] vs 53/157 [33.8%]; P = 0.627). Independent predictors of RFS were malignancy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.06-4.15; P = 0.035), septic shock (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.17-4.39; P = 0.016), and high NICE RFS risk classification (OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.20-5.31; P = 0.015). Factors associated with reduced RFS risk were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores >12 (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.23-0.88; P = 0.020) and high-dose vasopressor treatment (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14-0.79; P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFS affected one-fourth of the critically ill patients but did not significantly impact 30-day mortality. Malignancy, septic shock, and high NICE RFS risk classification were positively associated with RFS, whereas high SOFA scores and extensive vasopressor use were linked to decreased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, predictive factors, and outcomes of refeeding syndrome among medically critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Surat Tongyoo, Pratya Rawangban, Thummaporn Naorungroj\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.11160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a life-threatening metabolic derangement occurring when nutrition is reintroduced after prolonged starvation. Limited data exist regarding RFS prevalence, risk factors, and outcome, particularly in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a medical intensive care unit from June 2018 to August 2020. RFS diagnostic criteria from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) were used. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 216 patients, RFS was diagnosed in 22.7% and 27.3% of patients per the NICE and ASPEN criteria, respectively. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between patients with and without RFS (22/59 [37.3%] vs 53/157 [33.8%]; P = 0.627). Independent predictors of RFS were malignancy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.06-4.15; P = 0.035), septic shock (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.17-4.39; P = 0.016), and high NICE RFS risk classification (OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.20-5.31; P = 0.015). Factors associated with reduced RFS risk were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores >12 (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.23-0.88; P = 0.020) and high-dose vasopressor treatment (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14-0.79; P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFS affected one-fourth of the critically ill patients but did not significantly impact 30-day mortality. Malignancy, septic shock, and high NICE RFS risk classification were positively associated with RFS, whereas high SOFA scores and extensive vasopressor use were linked to decreased risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:再喂养综合征(RFS)是一种危及生命的代谢紊乱,发生在长期饥饿后重新输入营养时。有关再喂养综合征的发病率、风险因素和预后的数据有限,尤其是在重症患者中:2018 年 6 月至 2020 年 8 月,在一家内科重症监护病房开展了一项回顾性队列研究。研究采用了美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)和美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)的 RFS 诊断标准。主要结果为 30 天死亡率:在 216 名患者中,根据 NICE 和 ASPEN 标准分别有 22.7% 和 27.3% 的患者被诊断为 RFS。有 RFS 和无 RFS 患者的 30 天死亡率无明显差异(22/59 [37.3%] vs 53/157 [33.8%];P = 0.627)。RFS的独立预测因素是恶性肿瘤(比值比 [OR] = 2.09;95% CI = 1.06-4.15;P = 0.035)、脓毒性休克(OR = 2.26;95% CI = 1.17-4.39;P = 0.016)和NICE RFS高风险分级(OR = 2.52;95% CI = 1.20-5.31;P = 0.015)。与RFS风险降低相关的因素是序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分>12(OR = 0.45;95% CI = 0.23-0.88;P = 0.020)和大剂量血管加压治疗(OR = 0.34;95% CI = 0.14-0.79;P = 0.012):RFS影响了四分之一的重症患者,但对30天死亡率没有显著影响。恶性肿瘤、脓毒性休克和NICE RFS风险分级高与RFS呈正相关,而SOFA评分高和大量使用血管加压素则与风险降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence, predictive factors, and outcomes of refeeding syndrome among medically critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a life-threatening metabolic derangement occurring when nutrition is reintroduced after prolonged starvation. Limited data exist regarding RFS prevalence, risk factors, and outcome, particularly in critically ill patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a medical intensive care unit from June 2018 to August 2020. RFS diagnostic criteria from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) were used. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: Among 216 patients, RFS was diagnosed in 22.7% and 27.3% of patients per the NICE and ASPEN criteria, respectively. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between patients with and without RFS (22/59 [37.3%] vs 53/157 [33.8%]; P = 0.627). Independent predictors of RFS were malignancy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.06-4.15; P = 0.035), septic shock (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.17-4.39; P = 0.016), and high NICE RFS risk classification (OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.20-5.31; P = 0.015). Factors associated with reduced RFS risk were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores >12 (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.23-0.88; P = 0.020) and high-dose vasopressor treatment (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14-0.79; P = 0.012).

Conclusion: RFS affected one-fourth of the critically ill patients but did not significantly impact 30-day mortality. Malignancy, septic shock, and high NICE RFS risk classification were positively associated with RFS, whereas high SOFA scores and extensive vasopressor use were linked to decreased risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信