空气自行车和跑步机最大摄氧量评估方案的一致性:一项探索性研究

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Travis Lipscomb, Megan Sax VAN DER Weyden, Ali Boolani, Bryan St Andrews, Joel Martin
{"title":"空气自行车和跑步机最大摄氧量评估方案的一致性:一项探索性研究","authors":"Travis Lipscomb, Megan Sax VAN DER Weyden, Ali Boolani, Bryan St Andrews, Joel Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2max</sub>) is an important measure of aerobic fitness, with applications in evaluating fitness, designing training programs, and assessing overall health. While treadmill assessments are considered the gold standard, airbikes (ABs) are increasingly popular exercise machines. However, limited research exists on AB-based V̇O2max assessments, particularly regarding agreement with treadmill graded exercise tests. To address this gap, a randomized crossover study was conducted, involving 15 healthy adults (9M, 6F, 7 familiar with AB) aged 30.1 ± 8.6 years. Paired <i>t</i>-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman and Principal component (PC) analyses were used to assess agreement between protocols. The results demonstrated good to excellent agreement in V̇O<sub>2max</sub>, maximum heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (ICC range: 0.89-0.92). However, significant differences were observed in several measures, including V̇O<sub>2max</sub> and maximum HR (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Overall a systematic bias 3.31 mL/kg/min (treadmill > AB, 95%CI[1.67,4.94]) was observed, no proportional bias was present; however, regular AB users (systematic bias: 1.27 (95%CI[0.20,2.34]) mL/kg/min) exhibited higher agreement in V̇O<sub>2max</sub> measures compared to non-regular users (systematic bias: 5.09 (95%CI[3.69,6.49]) mL/kg/min). There were no significant differences in cardiorespiratory coordination, between the AB and the treadmill. These findings suggest that for individuals familiar with the AB, it can be a suitable alternative for assessing V̇O<sub>2max</sub> compared to the treadmill. Future research with larger samples should focus on developing prediction equations for field AB tests to predict V̇O<sub>2max</sub>. Practitioners should consider using the AB to assess V̇O<sub>2max</sub> in individuals who prefer it over running.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"633-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of Air Bike and Treadmill Protocols to Assess Maximal Oxygen Uptake: An Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Travis Lipscomb, Megan Sax VAN DER Weyden, Ali Boolani, Bryan St Andrews, Joel Martin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2max</sub>) is an important measure of aerobic fitness, with applications in evaluating fitness, designing training programs, and assessing overall health. While treadmill assessments are considered the gold standard, airbikes (ABs) are increasingly popular exercise machines. However, limited research exists on AB-based V̇O2max assessments, particularly regarding agreement with treadmill graded exercise tests. To address this gap, a randomized crossover study was conducted, involving 15 healthy adults (9M, 6F, 7 familiar with AB) aged 30.1 ± 8.6 years. Paired <i>t</i>-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman and Principal component (PC) analyses were used to assess agreement between protocols. The results demonstrated good to excellent agreement in V̇O<sub>2max</sub>, maximum heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (ICC range: 0.89-0.92). However, significant differences were observed in several measures, including V̇O<sub>2max</sub> and maximum HR (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Overall a systematic bias 3.31 mL/kg/min (treadmill > AB, 95%CI[1.67,4.94]) was observed, no proportional bias was present; however, regular AB users (systematic bias: 1.27 (95%CI[0.20,2.34]) mL/kg/min) exhibited higher agreement in V̇O<sub>2max</sub> measures compared to non-regular users (systematic bias: 5.09 (95%CI[3.69,6.49]) mL/kg/min). There were no significant differences in cardiorespiratory coordination, between the AB and the treadmill. These findings suggest that for individuals familiar with the AB, it can be a suitable alternative for assessing V̇O<sub>2max</sub> compared to the treadmill. Future research with larger samples should focus on developing prediction equations for field AB tests to predict V̇O<sub>2max</sub>. Practitioners should consider using the AB to assess V̇O<sub>2max</sub> in individuals who prefer it over running.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"633-647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166135/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最大耗氧量(VO2max)是衡量有氧体能的重要指标,可用于评估体能、设计训练计划和评估总体健康状况。虽然跑步机评估被认为是黄金标准,但空中自行车(AB)也是越来越受欢迎的运动器械。然而,关于基于气垫自行车的 V̇O2max 评估,尤其是与跑步机分级运动测试的一致性方面的研究十分有限。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了一项随机交叉研究,研究对象为 15 名健康成年人(9 名男性,6 名女性,7 名熟悉 AB),年龄为 30.1 ± 8.6 岁。采用配对 t 检验、类内相关系数 (ICC)、布兰-阿尔特曼分析和主成分 (PC) 分析来评估不同方案之间的一致性。结果表明,在最大血氧活量、最大心率(HR)和感知用力评分(ICC 范围:0.89-0.92)方面存在良好到极佳的一致性。然而,在包括最大脉搏容积和最大心率在内的几项指标上观察到了明显差异(p < 0.01)。总体而言,观察到系统偏差为 3.31 毫升/千克/分钟(跑步机 > AB,95%CI[1.67,4.94]),不存在比例偏差;然而,与非固定使用者(系统偏差:5.09(95%CI[3.69,6.49])毫升/千克/分钟)相比,AB 的固定使用者(系统偏差:1.27(95%CI[0.20,2.34])毫升/千克/分钟)在 V̇O2max 测量中表现出更高的一致性。AB 和跑步机在心肺协调方面没有明显差异。这些研究结果表明,对于熟悉 AB 的人来说,与跑步机相比,AB 是评估 V̇O2max 的合适替代方法。未来针对更大样本的研究应侧重于开发现场 AB 测试的预测方程,以预测 V̇O2max。从业人员应考虑使用 AB 评估喜欢 AB 而不是跑步的人的最大 V̇O2max。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement of Air Bike and Treadmill Protocols to Assess Maximal Oxygen Uptake: An Exploratory Study.

Maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) is an important measure of aerobic fitness, with applications in evaluating fitness, designing training programs, and assessing overall health. While treadmill assessments are considered the gold standard, airbikes (ABs) are increasingly popular exercise machines. However, limited research exists on AB-based V̇O2max assessments, particularly regarding agreement with treadmill graded exercise tests. To address this gap, a randomized crossover study was conducted, involving 15 healthy adults (9M, 6F, 7 familiar with AB) aged 30.1 ± 8.6 years. Paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman and Principal component (PC) analyses were used to assess agreement between protocols. The results demonstrated good to excellent agreement in V̇O2max, maximum heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (ICC range: 0.89-0.92). However, significant differences were observed in several measures, including V̇O2max and maximum HR (p < 0.01). Overall a systematic bias 3.31 mL/kg/min (treadmill > AB, 95%CI[1.67,4.94]) was observed, no proportional bias was present; however, regular AB users (systematic bias: 1.27 (95%CI[0.20,2.34]) mL/kg/min) exhibited higher agreement in V̇O2max measures compared to non-regular users (systematic bias: 5.09 (95%CI[3.69,6.49]) mL/kg/min). There were no significant differences in cardiorespiratory coordination, between the AB and the treadmill. These findings suggest that for individuals familiar with the AB, it can be a suitable alternative for assessing V̇O2max compared to the treadmill. Future research with larger samples should focus on developing prediction equations for field AB tests to predict V̇O2max. Practitioners should consider using the AB to assess V̇O2max in individuals who prefer it over running.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信