间歇性θ脉冲刺激对促进中风后上肢恢复的效果:随机对照研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Esma Nur Kolbaşı, Burcu Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu, Zeynep Ozdemir, Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu, Aysun Soysal
{"title":"间歇性θ脉冲刺激对促进中风后上肢恢复的效果:随机对照研究","authors":"Esma Nur Kolbaşı, Burcu Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu, Zeynep Ozdemir, Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu, Aysun Soysal","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To first investigate the effectiveness of modified constraint-ınduced movement therapy (mCIMT) in low-functioning patients with stroke (PwS). Second, we aimed to investigate the efficiency of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), applied on intermittent days, in addition to the mCIMT in PwS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifteen PwS (age [mean±SD]: 66.3±9.2 years; 53% female) who were in the first 1 to 12 months after the incident were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>PwS were divided into 3 groups: (1) mCIMT alone; (2) mCIMT + sham iTBS; (3) mCIMT + iTBS. Each group received 15 sessions of mCIMT (1 hour/session, 3 sessions/week). iTBS was applied with 600 pulses on impaired M1 before mCIMT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) impairment was assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Test (FMT-UE), whereas the motor function was evaluated with the Wolf-Motor Function Test (WMFT). Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28) was used to evaluate the amount of use and how well (How Well Scale) the impaired UE movements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With-in-group analysis revealed that all groups had statistically significant improvements based on the FMT-UE and MAL-28 (p<.05). However, the performance time and arm strength variables of WMFT were only increased in the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The only between-group difference was observed in the intracortical facilitation in favor of the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The effect size of iTBS was f=0.18.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that mCIMT with and without the application of iTBS has increased the UE motor function in low-functioning PwS. iTBS applied on intermittent days may have additional benefits as an adjunct therapy for facilitating cortical excitability, increasing the speed and strength of the impaired UE as well as decreasing disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation to Enhance Upper Extremity Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Esma Nur Kolbaşı, Burcu Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu, Zeynep Ozdemir, Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu, Aysun Soysal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To first investigate the effectiveness of modified constraint-ınduced movement therapy (mCIMT) in low-functioning patients with stroke (PwS). Second, we aimed to investigate the efficiency of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), applied on intermittent days, in addition to the mCIMT in PwS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifteen PwS (age [mean±SD]: 66.3±9.2 years; 53% female) who were in the first 1 to 12 months after the incident were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>PwS were divided into 3 groups: (1) mCIMT alone; (2) mCIMT + sham iTBS; (3) mCIMT + iTBS. Each group received 15 sessions of mCIMT (1 hour/session, 3 sessions/week). iTBS was applied with 600 pulses on impaired M1 before mCIMT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) impairment was assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Test (FMT-UE), whereas the motor function was evaluated with the Wolf-Motor Function Test (WMFT). Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28) was used to evaluate the amount of use and how well (How Well Scale) the impaired UE movements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With-in-group analysis revealed that all groups had statistically significant improvements based on the FMT-UE and MAL-28 (p<.05). However, the performance time and arm strength variables of WMFT were only increased in the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The only between-group difference was observed in the intracortical facilitation in favor of the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The effect size of iTBS was f=0.18.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that mCIMT with and without the application of iTBS has increased the UE motor function in low-functioning PwS. iTBS applied on intermittent days may have additional benefits as an adjunct therapy for facilitating cortical excitability, increasing the speed and strength of the impaired UE as well as decreasing disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的首先研究改良约束诱导运动疗法(mCIMT)对低功能中风患者(PwS)的有效性。其次,我们旨在研究间歇性θ-脉冲刺激(iTBS)在间歇性应用于 mCIMT 的同时对 PwS 的有效性:随机、假对照、单盲研究:参与者研究纳入了 15 名发病后 1-12 个月内的 PwS(年龄 66.3 ± 9.2 岁(平均 ± SD);53% 为女性):患者被分为三组:1)单独使用 mCIMT;2)mCIMT + 假 iTBS;3)mCIMT + iTBS。每组接受 15 次 mCIMT(1 小时/次,3 次/周)。在进行 mCIMT 之前,在受损的 M1 上施加 600 脉冲的 iTBS:上肢(UE)损伤通过福格-迈耶测试(FMT-UE)进行评估,运动功能通过沃尔夫运动功能测试(WMFT)进行评估。运动活动日志-28(MAL-28)用于评估受损肢体运动的使用量(AUS)和效果(HWS):结果:组内分析显示,根据 FMT-UE 和 MAL-28,所有组均有统计学意义上的显著改善(p):我们的研究结果表明,使用或不使用 iTBS 的 mCIMT 可增强低功能 PwS 的 UE 运动功能。作为一种辅助疗法,间歇性使用 iTBS 可促进大脑皮层的兴奋性、提高受损 UE 的速度和强度并减少残疾,从而带来更多益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation to Enhance Upper Extremity Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Objectives: To first investigate the effectiveness of modified constraint-ınduced movement therapy (mCIMT) in low-functioning patients with stroke (PwS). Second, we aimed to investigate the efficiency of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), applied on intermittent days, in addition to the mCIMT in PwS.

Design: A randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded study.

Setting: Outpatient clinic.

Participants: Fifteen PwS (age [mean±SD]: 66.3±9.2 years; 53% female) who were in the first 1 to 12 months after the incident were included in the study.

Interventions: PwS were divided into 3 groups: (1) mCIMT alone; (2) mCIMT + sham iTBS; (3) mCIMT + iTBS. Each group received 15 sessions of mCIMT (1 hour/session, 3 sessions/week). iTBS was applied with 600 pulses on impaired M1 before mCIMT.

Main outcome measures: Upper extremity (UE) impairment was assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Test (FMT-UE), whereas the motor function was evaluated with the Wolf-Motor Function Test (WMFT). Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28) was used to evaluate the amount of use and how well (How Well Scale) the impaired UE movements.

Results: With-in-group analysis revealed that all groups had statistically significant improvements based on the FMT-UE and MAL-28 (p<.05). However, the performance time and arm strength variables of WMFT were only increased in the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The only between-group difference was observed in the intracortical facilitation in favor of the mCIMT + iTBS group (p<.05). The effect size of iTBS was f=0.18.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that mCIMT with and without the application of iTBS has increased the UE motor function in low-functioning PwS. iTBS applied on intermittent days may have additional benefits as an adjunct therapy for facilitating cortical excitability, increasing the speed and strength of the impaired UE as well as decreasing disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信