Matison W. McCool, Frank J. Schwebel, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan
{"title":"在一项针对互助小组成员的深入纵向研究中,研究早期坚持治疗的措施对后续坚持治疗的预测作用:一天一次","authors":"Matison W. McCool, Frank J. Schwebel, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan","doi":"10.1111/acer.15385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with a substance use disorder complete ecological momentary assessments (EMA) at lower rates than community samples. Previous research in tobacco users indicates that early log-in counts to smoking cessation websites predicted subsequent smoking cessation website usage. We extended this line of research to examine individuals who are seeking to change their drinking behaviors through mutual support groups. We examined whether adherence in the first 7 days (1487 observations) of an intensive longitudinal study design could predict subsequent EMA protocol adherence (50% and 80% adherence separately) at 30 (5700 observations) and 60 days (10,750 observations).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 132) attending mutual-help groups for alcohol use completed two assessments per day for 6 months. We trained four classification models (logistic regression, recursive partitioning, support vector machines, and neural networks) using a training dataset (80% of the data) with each of the first 7 days' cumulative EMA assessment completion. We then tested these models to predict the remaining 20% of the data and evaluated model classification accuracy. We also used univariate receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the minimal combination of days and completion percentage to best predict subsequent adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Different modeling techniques can be used with early assessment completion as predictors to accurately classify individuals that will meet minimal and optimal adherence rates later in the study. Models ranged in their performance from poor to outstanding classification, with no single model clearly outperforming other models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional and machine learning approaches can be used concurrently to examine several methods of predicting EMA adherence based on early assessment completion. Future studies could investigate the use of several algorithms in real time to help improve participant adherence rates by monitoring early adherence and using early assessment completion as features in predictive modeling.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining early adherence measures as predictors of subsequent adherence in an intensive longitudinal study of individuals in mutual help groups: One day at a time\",\"authors\":\"Matison W. McCool, Frank J. Schwebel, Matthew R. Pearson, J. Scott Tonigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.15385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals with a substance use disorder complete ecological momentary assessments (EMA) at lower rates than community samples. Previous research in tobacco users indicates that early log-in counts to smoking cessation websites predicted subsequent smoking cessation website usage. We extended this line of research to examine individuals who are seeking to change their drinking behaviors through mutual support groups. We examined whether adherence in the first 7 days (1487 observations) of an intensive longitudinal study design could predict subsequent EMA protocol adherence (50% and 80% adherence separately) at 30 (5700 observations) and 60 days (10,750 observations).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 132) attending mutual-help groups for alcohol use completed two assessments per day for 6 months. We trained four classification models (logistic regression, recursive partitioning, support vector machines, and neural networks) using a training dataset (80% of the data) with each of the first 7 days' cumulative EMA assessment completion. We then tested these models to predict the remaining 20% of the data and evaluated model classification accuracy. We also used univariate receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the minimal combination of days and completion percentage to best predict subsequent adherence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Different modeling techniques can be used with early assessment completion as predictors to accurately classify individuals that will meet minimal and optimal adherence rates later in the study. Models ranged in their performance from poor to outstanding classification, with no single model clearly outperforming other models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Traditional and machine learning approaches can be used concurrently to examine several methods of predicting EMA adherence based on early assessment completion. Future studies could investigate the use of several algorithms in real time to help improve participant adherence rates by monitoring early adherence and using early assessment completion as features in predictive modeling.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:药物使用障碍患者完成生态瞬间评估(EMA)的比率低于社区样本。以前对烟草使用者的研究表明,戒烟网站的早期登录次数可预测戒烟网站的后续使用情况。我们将这一研究思路延伸到了通过互助小组寻求改变饮酒行为的人身上。我们研究了强化纵向研究设计的前 7 天(1487 次观察)的依从性能否预测随后 30 天(5700 次观察)和 60 天(10750 次观察)的 EMA 方案依从性(分别为 50%和 80% 的依从性):参加酗酒互助小组的参与者(n = 132)在 6 个月内每天完成两次评估。我们使用训练数据集(80% 的数据)训练了四个分类模型(逻辑回归、递归分割、支持向量机和神经网络),每个模型都包含前 7 天累计 EMA 评估的完成情况。然后,我们对这些模型进行了测试,以预测剩余 20% 的数据,并评估了模型分类的准确性。我们还使用单变量接收者操作特征曲线来研究最能预测后续依从性的天数和完成百分比的最小组合:结果:不同的建模技术可用于早期评估完成情况的预测,以准确地对研究后期达到最低和最佳依从率的个体进行分类。模型的表现从较差到出色不等,没有一个模型明显优于其他模型:结论:传统方法和机器学习方法可同时用于研究根据早期评估完成情况预测 EMA 依从性的几种方法。未来的研究可以调查几种算法的实时使用情况,通过监测早期依从性并将早期评估完成情况作为预测模型的特征,帮助提高参与者的依从率。
Examining early adherence measures as predictors of subsequent adherence in an intensive longitudinal study of individuals in mutual help groups: One day at a time
Background
Individuals with a substance use disorder complete ecological momentary assessments (EMA) at lower rates than community samples. Previous research in tobacco users indicates that early log-in counts to smoking cessation websites predicted subsequent smoking cessation website usage. We extended this line of research to examine individuals who are seeking to change their drinking behaviors through mutual support groups. We examined whether adherence in the first 7 days (1487 observations) of an intensive longitudinal study design could predict subsequent EMA protocol adherence (50% and 80% adherence separately) at 30 (5700 observations) and 60 days (10,750 observations).
Methods
Participants (n = 132) attending mutual-help groups for alcohol use completed two assessments per day for 6 months. We trained four classification models (logistic regression, recursive partitioning, support vector machines, and neural networks) using a training dataset (80% of the data) with each of the first 7 days' cumulative EMA assessment completion. We then tested these models to predict the remaining 20% of the data and evaluated model classification accuracy. We also used univariate receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the minimal combination of days and completion percentage to best predict subsequent adherence.
Results
Different modeling techniques can be used with early assessment completion as predictors to accurately classify individuals that will meet minimal and optimal adherence rates later in the study. Models ranged in their performance from poor to outstanding classification, with no single model clearly outperforming other models.
Conclusions
Traditional and machine learning approaches can be used concurrently to examine several methods of predicting EMA adherence based on early assessment completion. Future studies could investigate the use of several algorithms in real time to help improve participant adherence rates by monitoring early adherence and using early assessment completion as features in predictive modeling.