临床疑似关节痛和类风湿性关节炎:患者对疾病的看法。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Sarah J.H. Khidir , Pascal H.P. de Jong , Annemiek Willemze , Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil , Elise van Mulligen
{"title":"临床疑似关节痛和类风湿性关节炎:患者对疾病的看法。","authors":"Sarah J.H. Khidir ,&nbsp;Pascal H.P. de Jong ,&nbsp;Annemiek Willemze ,&nbsp;Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil ,&nbsp;Elise van Mulligen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) is an at-risk stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in which patients experience symptoms and physical limitations. Perceptions of CSA-patients have remained largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to map perceptions of CSA-patients and compare these to RA-patients. Additionally, we studied changes in perceptions in CSA over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three hundred and ninety-nine consecutively included CSA-patients from the Leiden and Rotterdam CSA-cohorts and 100 recently diagnosed RA-patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic were included. Patients’ illness perceptions (IP) were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), consisting of 8 questions (scale 0–10; higher score indicating more negative IP) covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains, and one open question about causes of disease. IP were measured at baseline in both populations and during 2<!--> <!-->years follow-up in the CSA-cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total BIPQ-scores were comparable at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis (40<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 and 40<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10; range 0–80). Comparing dimensions separately revealed that CSA-patients were less worried about physical complaints compared to RA-patients. However, CSA-patients were more negative about expected treatment-effect on symptoms. IP over time in CSA improved in patients without development of clinical arthritis (from 38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 to 34<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005) but remained similar in CSA-patients who progressed to arthritis/RA (mean 40 at both timepoints). CSA-patients mainly perceived physical strain and heredity as causes of their complaints.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although CSA-patients have not developed clinical arthritis, illness perceptions at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis are equally severe. Knowledge on worries and expectations may contribute to improving patient-contact and care in patients at risk of RA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54902,"journal":{"name":"Joint Bone Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000629/pdfft?md5=4dff0f8eed67fdee2fe4b5a4381ca7d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1297319X24000629-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically suspect arthralgia and rheumatoid arthritis: patients’ perceptions of illness\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J.H. Khidir ,&nbsp;Pascal H.P. de Jong ,&nbsp;Annemiek Willemze ,&nbsp;Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil ,&nbsp;Elise van Mulligen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) is an at-risk stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in which patients experience symptoms and physical limitations. Perceptions of CSA-patients have remained largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to map perceptions of CSA-patients and compare these to RA-patients. Additionally, we studied changes in perceptions in CSA over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three hundred and ninety-nine consecutively included CSA-patients from the Leiden and Rotterdam CSA-cohorts and 100 recently diagnosed RA-patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic were included. Patients’ illness perceptions (IP) were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), consisting of 8 questions (scale 0–10; higher score indicating more negative IP) covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains, and one open question about causes of disease. IP were measured at baseline in both populations and during 2<!--> <!-->years follow-up in the CSA-cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total BIPQ-scores were comparable at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis (40<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 and 40<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10; range 0–80). Comparing dimensions separately revealed that CSA-patients were less worried about physical complaints compared to RA-patients. However, CSA-patients were more negative about expected treatment-effect on symptoms. IP over time in CSA improved in patients without development of clinical arthritis (from 38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11 to 34<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005) but remained similar in CSA-patients who progressed to arthritis/RA (mean 40 at both timepoints). CSA-patients mainly perceived physical strain and heredity as causes of their complaints.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although CSA-patients have not developed clinical arthritis, illness perceptions at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis are equally severe. Knowledge on worries and expectations may contribute to improving patient-contact and care in patients at risk of RA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Bone Spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000629/pdfft?md5=4dff0f8eed67fdee2fe4b5a4381ca7d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1297319X24000629-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Bone Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Bone Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床疑似关节痛(CSA)是类风湿性关节炎(RA)的高危阶段,患者会出现症状和身体受限。人们对 CSA 患者的看法在很大程度上仍不为人所知。因此,我们旨在绘制 CSA 患者的认知图,并将其与 RA 患者进行比较。此外,我们还研究了 CSA 患者的感知随时间推移而发生的变化。方法:研究对象包括莱顿和鹿特丹 CSA 群体中连续纳入的 399 名 CSA 患者,以及莱顿早期关节炎诊所中最近确诊的 100 名 RA 患者。患者的疾病感知(IP)通过简明疾病感知问卷(BIPQ)进行评估,该问卷由 8 个问题组成(0-10 分;分数越高,表示患者的疾病感知越消极),涵盖认知、情感和理解力等领域,还有一个关于疾病原因的开放性问题。对两个群体的基线和 CSA 群体的 2 年随访进行了 IP 测量:结果:BIPQ总分在CSA出现和RA确诊时相当(40±11和40±10;范围0-80)。分别比较各维度后发现,与 RA 患者相比,CSA 患者对身体不适的担忧更少。然而,CSA 患者对预期治疗对症状的影响更为消极。随着时间的推移,未发展为临床关节炎的 CSA 患者的 IP 有所改善(从 38±11 降至 34±14;P=0.005),但发展为关节炎/RA 的 CSA 患者的 IP 保持相似(两个时间点的平均值均为 40)。CSA患者主要认为身体劳损和遗传是导致其症状的原因:结论:尽管CSA患者没有发展为临床关节炎,但他们在CSA出现和RA确诊时对疾病的认知同样严重。了解患者的担忧和期望可能有助于改善与患者的接触,并为面临RA风险的患者提供更好的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinically suspect arthralgia and rheumatoid arthritis: patients’ perceptions of illness

Objectives

Clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) is an at-risk stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in which patients experience symptoms and physical limitations. Perceptions of CSA-patients have remained largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to map perceptions of CSA-patients and compare these to RA-patients. Additionally, we studied changes in perceptions in CSA over time.

Methods

Three hundred and ninety-nine consecutively included CSA-patients from the Leiden and Rotterdam CSA-cohorts and 100 recently diagnosed RA-patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic were included. Patients’ illness perceptions (IP) were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), consisting of 8 questions (scale 0–10; higher score indicating more negative IP) covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains, and one open question about causes of disease. IP were measured at baseline in both populations and during 2 years follow-up in the CSA-cohorts.

Results

Total BIPQ-scores were comparable at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis (40 ± 11 and 40 ± 10; range 0–80). Comparing dimensions separately revealed that CSA-patients were less worried about physical complaints compared to RA-patients. However, CSA-patients were more negative about expected treatment-effect on symptoms. IP over time in CSA improved in patients without development of clinical arthritis (from 38 ± 11 to 34 ± 14; P = 0.005) but remained similar in CSA-patients who progressed to arthritis/RA (mean 40 at both timepoints). CSA-patients mainly perceived physical strain and heredity as causes of their complaints.

Conclusions

Although CSA-patients have not developed clinical arthritis, illness perceptions at CSA-presentation and RA-diagnosis are equally severe. Knowledge on worries and expectations may contribute to improving patient-contact and care in patients at risk of RA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Joint Bone Spine
Joint Bone Spine 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Bimonthly e-only international journal, Joint Bone Spine publishes in English original research articles and all the latest advances that deal with disorders affecting the joints, bones, and spine and, more generally, the entire field of rheumatology. All submitted manuscripts to the journal are subjected to rigorous peer review by international experts: under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. (Surgical techniques and work focusing specifically on orthopedic surgery are not within the scope of the journal.)Joint Bone Spine is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信