边缘型人格障碍和双相情感障碍中的人格特征和童年虐待史:比较研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
D Bradford Reich, Jalan Gatchell, Nathaniel Lovell-Smith, Boyu Ren, Mary C Zanarini
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍和双相情感障碍中的人格特征和童年虐待史:比较研究。","authors":"D Bradford Reich, Jalan Gatchell, Nathaniel Lovell-Smith, Boyu Ren, Mary C Zanarini","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.3.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar 2 disorder (BP 2 disorder) with respect to reported childhood trauma and Five-Factor personality traits using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Participants were 50 men and women, aged 18-45, with <i>DSM</i>-5-diagnosed BPD and 50 men and women in the same age group with <i>DSM</i>-5-diagnosed BP 2 disorder. Participants could not meet criteria for both BPD and BP 2 disorder. Borderline participants had significantly higher scores on the neuroticism subscale and significantly lower scores on the agreeableness subscale of the NEO-FFI. After correction for multiple comparisons, there were no between-group differences on CTQ scores. Study results suggest that BPD and BP 2 disorder differ primarily with respect to underlying temperament/genetic architecture and that environmental factors have only a limited role in the differential etiologies of the two disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 3","pages":"301-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reported Personality Traits and Histories of Childhood Maltreatment in Borderline Personality Disorder and Bipolar 2 Disorder: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"D Bradford Reich, Jalan Gatchell, Nathaniel Lovell-Smith, Boyu Ren, Mary C Zanarini\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.3.301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar 2 disorder (BP 2 disorder) with respect to reported childhood trauma and Five-Factor personality traits using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Participants were 50 men and women, aged 18-45, with <i>DSM</i>-5-diagnosed BPD and 50 men and women in the same age group with <i>DSM</i>-5-diagnosed BP 2 disorder. Participants could not meet criteria for both BPD and BP 2 disorder. Borderline participants had significantly higher scores on the neuroticism subscale and significantly lower scores on the agreeableness subscale of the NEO-FFI. After correction for multiple comparisons, there were no between-group differences on CTQ scores. Study results suggest that BPD and BP 2 disorder differ primarily with respect to underlying temperament/genetic architecture and that environmental factors have only a limited role in the differential etiologies of the two disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality Disorders\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"301-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.3.301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.3.301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用童年创伤问卷(CTQ)和NEO五因素量表(NEO-FFI),比较了边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和双相情感障碍(BP2)与所报告的童年创伤和五因素人格特质之间的关系。参与者包括 50 名年龄在 18-45 岁之间、患有 DSM-5 确诊的 BPD 的男性和女性,以及 50 名患有 DSM-5 确诊的 BP 2 障碍的同年龄组男性和女性。参与者不能同时符合 BPD 和 BP 2 障碍的标准。边缘型参与者在 NEO-FFI 神经质分量表上的得分明显较高,而在宜人性分量表上的得分明显较低。经多重比较校正后,CTQ得分没有组间差异。研究结果表明,BPD和BP 2障碍主要在潜在的气质/遗传结构方面存在差异,而环境因素在这两种障碍的不同病因中只起了有限的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reported Personality Traits and Histories of Childhood Maltreatment in Borderline Personality Disorder and Bipolar 2 Disorder: A Comparative Study.

This study compared borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar 2 disorder (BP 2 disorder) with respect to reported childhood trauma and Five-Factor personality traits using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Participants were 50 men and women, aged 18-45, with DSM-5-diagnosed BPD and 50 men and women in the same age group with DSM-5-diagnosed BP 2 disorder. Participants could not meet criteria for both BPD and BP 2 disorder. Borderline participants had significantly higher scores on the neuroticism subscale and significantly lower scores on the agreeableness subscale of the NEO-FFI. After correction for multiple comparisons, there were no between-group differences on CTQ scores. Study results suggest that BPD and BP 2 disorder differ primarily with respect to underlying temperament/genetic architecture and that environmental factors have only a limited role in the differential etiologies of the two disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信