Alysson Enes, Ragami C Alves, Vinicius Zen, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Luis H B Ferreira, Luciano R Guiraldelli, Roberto Simao, Guillermo Escalante, Anderson Z Ulbrich, Tacito P Souzajunior
{"title":"阻力训练技术对受训男性代谢反应的影响","authors":"Alysson Enes, Ragami C Alves, Vinicius Zen, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Luis H B Ferreira, Luciano R Guiraldelli, Roberto Simao, Guillermo Escalante, Anderson Z Ulbrich, Tacito P Souzajunior","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume (<i>p</i> = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure (<i>p</i> = 0.003 vs. drop-set; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.034 vs. drop-set; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 2","pages":"576-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males.\",\"authors\":\"Alysson Enes, Ragami C Alves, Vinicius Zen, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Luis H B Ferreira, Luciano R Guiraldelli, Roberto Simao, Guillermo Escalante, Anderson Z Ulbrich, Tacito P Souzajunior\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume (<i>p</i> = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure (<i>p</i> = 0.003 vs. drop-set; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.034 vs. drop-set; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"576-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males.
This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume (p = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure (p = 0.003 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption (p = 0.034 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions (p > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels (p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT (p = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.