深度学习重建的新一代 0.55 T 膝关节磁共振成像--与传统 3 T 磁共振成像的前瞻性比较。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001093
Ricardo Donners, Jan Vosshenrich, Martin Segeroth, Magdalena Seng, Matthias Fenchel, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Michael Bach, Florian Schmaranzer, Inga Todorski, Markus M Obmann, Dorothee Harder, Hanns-Christian Breit
{"title":"深度学习重建的新一代 0.55 T 膝关节磁共振成像--与传统 3 T 磁共振成像的前瞻性比较。","authors":"Ricardo Donners, Jan Vosshenrich, Martin Segeroth, Magdalena Seng, Matthias Fenchel, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Michael Bach, Florian Schmaranzer, Inga Todorski, Markus M Obmann, Dorothee Harder, Hanns-Christian Breit","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared ( P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"823-830"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Donners, Jan Vosshenrich, Martin Segeroth, Magdalena Seng, Matthias Fenchel, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Michael Bach, Florian Schmaranzer, Inga Todorski, Markus M Obmann, Dorothee Harder, Hanns-Christian Breit\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared ( P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"823-830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较深度学习重建(DLR)0.55 T 磁共振成像(MRI)的质量、结构异常的识别和分级以及读者对创伤后膝关节疼痛患者传统 3 T 膝关节 MRI 的置信度:这项前瞻性研究共对 26 名有症状的患者(5 名女性)进行了检查,其中包括 52 次在 1 个环境中获得的配对 DLR 0.55 T 和常规 3 T MRI 检查。在 0.55 T 图像重建中采用了一种新型的、市场上可买到的 DLR 算法。四位经委员会认证的放射科医生独立审查了所有图像,并对图像质量进行了分级,指出了结构异常和各自对是否存在结构异常的报告置信度,并对骨、软骨、半月板、韧带和肌腱病变进行了分级。对图像质量和读者信心水平进行比较(P < 0.05,差异显著),并使用 Cohen kappa (κ)对 0.55 T 和 3 T MRI 结果进行相关性分析:结果:读者一致认为,DLR 0.55 T MRI 和 3 T MRI 的图像质量良好(3.8 vs 4.1/5 points,P = 0.06)。在结构异常的识别方面,0.55 T DLR 和 3 T MRI 几乎与所有读者完全一致(各 κ ≥ 0.80)。在软骨(κ = 0.65-0.86)和半月板病变(κ = 0.71-1.0)的分级方面,0.55 T 和 3 T MRI 的结果基本接近完美一致。所有读者对 DLR 0.55 T 和 3 T MRI 的置信度都很高,其中 3 位读者对 3 T MRI 报告软骨损伤的置信度更高:总之,新一代 0.55 T DLR MRI 具有良好的图像质量,可与传统的 3 T MRI 相媲美,并能可靠地识别膝关节内部病变,读者的置信度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma.

Materials and methods: This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared ( P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ).

Results: In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI.

Conclusions: In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信