国会委员会发现邮寄选票程序有问题

{"title":"国会委员会发现邮寄选票程序有问题","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/mare.31087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, mail balloting became the primary method of conducting union elections. Now, although usage of mail balloting has waned, this method remains a much-used tool of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), particularly with regional offices dealing with budgetary problems and short staffing. Indeed, the NLRB has suggested that remote voting should be the way of the future. However, such efforts carry significant risks of unfairness for employers and employees, as concluded in a recent report by the Committee on Education and the Workforce for the U.S. House of Representatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":100883,"journal":{"name":"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations","volume":"47 7","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congressional Committee Finds Fault with Mail Ballot Procedures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mare.31087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, mail balloting became the primary method of conducting union elections. Now, although usage of mail balloting has waned, this method remains a much-used tool of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), particularly with regional offices dealing with budgetary problems and short staffing. Indeed, the NLRB has suggested that remote voting should be the way of the future. However, such efforts carry significant risks of unfairness for employers and employees, as concluded in a recent report by the Committee on Education and the Workforce for the U.S. House of Representatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations\",\"volume\":\"47 7\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mare.31087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Report for Nonunion Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mare.31087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,邮寄投票成为进行工会选举的主要方法。现在,虽然邮寄投票的使用率有所下降,但这种方法仍然是全国劳资关系委员会(NLRB)经常使用的工具,尤其是在地区办事处面临预算问题和人员短缺的情况下。事实上,全国劳资关系委员会曾建议未来应采用远程投票方式。然而,正如美国众议院教育和劳动力委员会在最近的一份报告中所总结的那样,这种做法对雇主和雇员都有很大的不公平风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Congressional Committee Finds Fault with Mail Ballot Procedures

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, mail balloting became the primary method of conducting union elections. Now, although usage of mail balloting has waned, this method remains a much-used tool of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), particularly with regional offices dealing with budgetary problems and short staffing. Indeed, the NLRB has suggested that remote voting should be the way of the future. However, such efforts carry significant risks of unfairness for employers and employees, as concluded in a recent report by the Committee on Education and the Workforce for the U.S. House of Representatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信