Kerry Peek, Andrew Ross, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Sara Dahlen, Julia Georgieva, Paula R Williamson, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner
{"title":"足球中的头球:头球发生率研究中使用的描述符、定义和报告方法的系统性回顾。","authors":"Kerry Peek, Andrew Ross, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Sara Dahlen, Julia Georgieva, Paula R Williamson, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heading in football: a systematic review of descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods used in heading incidence studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kerry Peek, Andrew Ross, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Sara Dahlen, Julia Georgieva, Paula R Williamson, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统性综述的主要目的是描述所有已发表的、报告足球运动中撞墙事件的研究中所使用的撞墙描述符的数量和类型。次要目标是详细说明纳入研究中使用的数据收集和报告方法,以呈现标题发生率数据。通过对五个电子数据库的检索,确定了符合条件的研究:使用自由文本关键字组合检索 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science(起始日期至 2023 年 9 月 12 日)。此外,还对参考文献目录和检索到的系统性综述进行了人工检索。本文对研究结果进行了描述性概述和综述。从 1620 项可能符合条件的研究中,纳入了 71 项研究,主要发现如下:1)只有 61% 的研究定义了标头,而在方法中提供标头操作定义的研究则更少(23%);2)包括年份和国家在内的重要研究和运动员人口统计数据往往没有报告;3)报告的标头描述符及其编码选项差异很大;4)当使用惯性测量单元收集标头发生率数据时,目视识别标头至关重要;5)标头发生率研究中使用的报告方法缺乏标准化,使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性。针对这些发现,应优先考虑制定一个标准化的、国际支持的、可操作的航标定义和相关航标描述符。进一步的建议包括制定标题发生率研究的最低报告标准。
Heading in football: a systematic review of descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods used in heading incidence studies.
The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.