让我们问问人们的想法:社区对冠状病毒疫苗接种的看法和建议。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ethnicity & Disease Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18865/ed.34.1.33
Christopher Payette, Charlotte Hanby, Maria Cerezo, Seamus Moran, Janice Blanchard
{"title":"让我们问问人们的想法:社区对冠状病毒疫苗接种的看法和建议。","authors":"Christopher Payette, Charlotte Hanby, Maria Cerezo, Seamus Moran, Janice Blanchard","doi":"10.18865/ed.34.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite widespread efforts to promote coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in the United States, a significant segment of the population is still unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to understand attitudes toward the vaccine in patients presenting to an urban emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative analysis and semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban emergency department from January 18, 2021, to March 14, 2021. Our final sample consisted of 32 people.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that people trusted their own medical providers rather than popular or political figures. Critiques of the vaccination program highlighted difficulties in navigation and perceptions of inequity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equitable distribution strategies and honest messaging may facilitate acceptance of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. Trustworthy sources for vaccine knowledge should be used to target populations in which vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let Us Just Ask People What They Think: Community Perceptions and Recommendations about Coronavirus Vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Payette, Charlotte Hanby, Maria Cerezo, Seamus Moran, Janice Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.18865/ed.34.1.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite widespread efforts to promote coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in the United States, a significant segment of the population is still unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to understand attitudes toward the vaccine in patients presenting to an urban emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative analysis and semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban emergency department from January 18, 2021, to March 14, 2021. Our final sample consisted of 32 people.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that people trusted their own medical providers rather than popular or political figures. Critiques of the vaccination program highlighted difficulties in navigation and perceptions of inequity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equitable distribution strategies and honest messaging may facilitate acceptance of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. Trustworthy sources for vaccine knowledge should be used to target populations in which vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.34.1.33\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.34.1.33","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管美国在广泛推广冠状病毒病 2019 疫苗接种,但仍有相当一部分人未接种或未完全接种疫苗:本研究旨在了解城市急诊科就诊患者对疫苗的态度:我们对 2021 年 1 月 18 日至 2021 年 3 月 14 日在城市急诊科就诊的患者进行了定性分析和半结构式访谈。我们的最终样本由 32 人组成:我们发现,人们信任自己的医疗服务提供者,而不是大众或政治人物。对疫苗接种计划的批评强调了导航困难和不公平感:结论:公平的分配策略和诚实的信息传递可促进人们接受 2019 年冠状病毒疾病疫苗。应利用值得信赖的疫苗知识来源,将疫苗接种犹豫不决的人群作为目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let Us Just Ask People What They Think: Community Perceptions and Recommendations about Coronavirus Vaccination.

Introduction: Despite widespread efforts to promote coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in the United States, a significant segment of the population is still unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated.

Objective: The objective of this study was to understand attitudes toward the vaccine in patients presenting to an urban emergency department.

Methods: We used a qualitative analysis and semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban emergency department from January 18, 2021, to March 14, 2021. Our final sample consisted of 32 people.

Results: We found that people trusted their own medical providers rather than popular or political figures. Critiques of the vaccination program highlighted difficulties in navigation and perceptions of inequity.

Conclusions: Equitable distribution strategies and honest messaging may facilitate acceptance of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. Trustworthy sources for vaccine knowledge should be used to target populations in which vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信