在识别脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血方面,比较脓毒症诱发凝血病和脓毒症相关凝血病标准。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Huixin Zhao, Yiming Dong, Sijia Wang, Jiayuan Shen, Zhenju Song, Mingming Xue, Mian Shao
{"title":"在识别脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血方面,比较脓毒症诱发凝血病和脓毒症相关凝血病标准。","authors":"Huixin Zhao, Yiming Dong, Sijia Wang, Jiayuan Shen, Zhenju Song, Mingming Xue, Mian Shao","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is associated with increased mortality in sepsis patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical ability of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) criteria in identifying overt-DIC and pre-DIC status in sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 419 sepsis patients were retrospectively collected from July 2018 to December 2022. The performances of the SIC and SAC were assessed to identify overt-DIC on days 1, 3, 7, or 14. The SIC status or SIC score on day 1, the SAC status or SAC score on day 1, and the sum of the SIC or SAC scores on days 1 and 3 were compared in terms of their ability to identify pre-DIC. The SIC or SAC status on day 1 was evaluated as a pre-DIC indicator for anticoagulant initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 1, the incidences of coagulopathy according to overt-DIC, SIC and SAC criteria were 11.7%, 22.0% and 31.5%, respectively. The specificity of SIC for identifying overt-DIC was significantly higher than that of the SAC criteria from day 1 to day 14 (<i>P</i><0.05). On day 1, the SIC score with a cut-off value > 3 had a significantly higher sensitivity (72.00%) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.69) in identifying pre-DIC than did the SIC or SAC status (sensitivity: SIC status 44.00%, SAC status 52.00%; AUC: SIC status 0.62, SAC status 0.61). The sum of the SIC scores on days 1 and 3 had a higher AUC value for identifying the pre-DIC state than that of SAC (0.79 vs. 0.69, <i>P</i><0.001). Favorable effects of anticoagulant therapy were observed in SIC (adjusted hazard ratio [<i>HR</i>]=0.216, 95% confidence interval [95% <i>CI</i>]: 0.060-0.783, <i>P</i>=0.018) and SAC (adjusted <i>HR</i>=0.146, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.041-0.513, <i>P</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SIC and SAC seem to be valuable for predicting overt-DIC. The sum of SIC scores on days 1 and 3 has the potential to help identify pre-DIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between sepsis-induced coagulopathy and sepsis-associated coagulopathy criteria in identifying sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Huixin Zhao, Yiming Dong, Sijia Wang, Jiayuan Shen, Zhenju Song, Mingming Xue, Mian Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is associated with increased mortality in sepsis patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical ability of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) criteria in identifying overt-DIC and pre-DIC status in sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 419 sepsis patients were retrospectively collected from July 2018 to December 2022. The performances of the SIC and SAC were assessed to identify overt-DIC on days 1, 3, 7, or 14. The SIC status or SIC score on day 1, the SAC status or SAC score on day 1, and the sum of the SIC or SAC scores on days 1 and 3 were compared in terms of their ability to identify pre-DIC. The SIC or SAC status on day 1 was evaluated as a pre-DIC indicator for anticoagulant initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 1, the incidences of coagulopathy according to overt-DIC, SIC and SAC criteria were 11.7%, 22.0% and 31.5%, respectively. The specificity of SIC for identifying overt-DIC was significantly higher than that of the SAC criteria from day 1 to day 14 (<i>P</i><0.05). On day 1, the SIC score with a cut-off value > 3 had a significantly higher sensitivity (72.00%) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.69) in identifying pre-DIC than did the SIC or SAC status (sensitivity: SIC status 44.00%, SAC status 52.00%; AUC: SIC status 0.62, SAC status 0.61). The sum of the SIC scores on days 1 and 3 had a higher AUC value for identifying the pre-DIC state than that of SAC (0.79 vs. 0.69, <i>P</i><0.001). Favorable effects of anticoagulant therapy were observed in SIC (adjusted hazard ratio [<i>HR</i>]=0.216, 95% confidence interval [95% <i>CI</i>]: 0.060-0.783, <i>P</i>=0.018) and SAC (adjusted <i>HR</i>=0.146, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.041-0.513, <i>P</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SIC and SAC seem to be valuable for predicting overt-DIC. The sum of SIC scores on days 1 and 3 has the potential to help identify pre-DIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:弥散性血管内凝血(DIC弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)与脓毒症患者死亡率的增加有关。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估脓毒症诱发凝血病(SIC)和脓毒症相关凝血病(SAC)标准在识别脓毒症患者过度DIC和DIC前期状态方面的临床能力:回顾性收集了2018年7月至2022年12月期间419例脓毒症患者的数据。评估了SIC和SAC在第1、3、7或14天识别过度DIC的性能。比较了第1天的SIC状态或SIC评分、第1天的SAC状态或SAC评分以及第1天和第3天的SIC或SAC评分之和识别前DIC的能力。第1天的SIC或SAC状态被评估为启动抗凝治疗的DIC前指标:结果:根据过度 DIC、SIC 和 SAC 标准,第 1 天的凝血病发生率分别为 11.7%、22.0% 和 31.5%。从第 1 天到第 14 天,SIC 识别过度-DIC 的特异性明显高于 SAC 标准(P 3 识别前 DIC 的灵敏度(72.00%)和曲线下面积(AUC)(0.69)明显高于 SIC 或 SAC 状态(灵敏度:SIC 状态 44.00%,SAC 状态 44.00%):SIC 状态为 44.00%,SAC 状态为 52.00%;AUC:SIC状态为0.62,SAC状态为0.61)。与 SAC 相比,第 1 天和第 3 天的 SIC 分数之和在确定 DIC 前状态方面具有更高的 AUC 值(0.79 对 0.69,PHR]=0.216,95% 置信区间[95% CI]:0.060-0.783):结论:结论:SIC和SAC似乎对预测过度DIC很有价值。结论:SIC和SAC似乎对预测过度DIC很有价值,第1天和第3天的SIC评分之和有可能帮助识别前DIC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between sepsis-induced coagulopathy and sepsis-associated coagulopathy criteria in identifying sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Background: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is associated with increased mortality in sepsis patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical ability of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) criteria in identifying overt-DIC and pre-DIC status in sepsis patients.

Methods: Data from 419 sepsis patients were retrospectively collected from July 2018 to December 2022. The performances of the SIC and SAC were assessed to identify overt-DIC on days 1, 3, 7, or 14. The SIC status or SIC score on day 1, the SAC status or SAC score on day 1, and the sum of the SIC or SAC scores on days 1 and 3 were compared in terms of their ability to identify pre-DIC. The SIC or SAC status on day 1 was evaluated as a pre-DIC indicator for anticoagulant initiation.

Results: On day 1, the incidences of coagulopathy according to overt-DIC, SIC and SAC criteria were 11.7%, 22.0% and 31.5%, respectively. The specificity of SIC for identifying overt-DIC was significantly higher than that of the SAC criteria from day 1 to day 14 (P<0.05). On day 1, the SIC score with a cut-off value > 3 had a significantly higher sensitivity (72.00%) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.69) in identifying pre-DIC than did the SIC or SAC status (sensitivity: SIC status 44.00%, SAC status 52.00%; AUC: SIC status 0.62, SAC status 0.61). The sum of the SIC scores on days 1 and 3 had a higher AUC value for identifying the pre-DIC state than that of SAC (0.79 vs. 0.69, P<0.001). Favorable effects of anticoagulant therapy were observed in SIC (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.216, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.060-0.783, P=0.018) and SAC (adjusted HR=0.146, 95% CI: 0.041-0.513, P=0.003).

Conclusion: The SIC and SAC seem to be valuable for predicting overt-DIC. The sum of SIC scores on days 1 and 3 has the potential to help identify pre-DIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信