棘手的环境:与城市地区相比,自然地区的啮齿动物中蜱传人畜共患病原体的流行率更高。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Vector borne and zoonotic diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1089/vbz.2023.0151
Marieke P de Cock, Valérie O Baede, Helen J Esser, Manoj Fonville, Ankje de Vries, Willem F de Boer, Calvin Mehl, Rainer G Ulrich, Gereon Schares, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Wim H M van der Poel, Hein Sprong, Miriam Maas
{"title":"棘手的环境:与城市地区相比,自然地区的啮齿动物中蜱传人畜共患病原体的流行率更高。","authors":"Marieke P de Cock, Valérie O Baede, Helen J Esser, Manoj Fonville, Ankje de Vries, Willem F de Boer, Calvin Mehl, Rainer G Ulrich, Gereon Schares, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Wim H M van der Poel, Hein Sprong, Miriam Maas","doi":"10.1089/vbz.2023.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice (<i>Apodemus sylvaticus</i>), bank voles (<i>Myodes glareolus</i>), yellow-necked mice (<i>Apodemus flavicollis</i>), house mice (<i>Mus musculus</i>), common voles (<i>Microtus arvalis</i>), and greater white-toothed shrews (<i>Crocidura russula</i>). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type (<i>i.e.,</i> natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens (<i>Borrelia</i> spp. and <i>Neoehrlichia mikurensis</i>) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of <i>Bartonella</i> spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use (<i>e.g.,</i> urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23683,"journal":{"name":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","volume":" ","pages":"478-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T(r)icky Environments: Higher Prevalence of Tick-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Rodents from Natural Areas Compared with Urban Areas.\",\"authors\":\"Marieke P de Cock, Valérie O Baede, Helen J Esser, Manoj Fonville, Ankje de Vries, Willem F de Boer, Calvin Mehl, Rainer G Ulrich, Gereon Schares, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Wim H M van der Poel, Hein Sprong, Miriam Maas\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/vbz.2023.0151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice (<i>Apodemus sylvaticus</i>), bank voles (<i>Myodes glareolus</i>), yellow-necked mice (<i>Apodemus flavicollis</i>), house mice (<i>Mus musculus</i>), common voles (<i>Microtus arvalis</i>), and greater white-toothed shrews (<i>Crocidura russula</i>). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type (<i>i.e.,</i> natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens (<i>Borrelia</i> spp. and <i>Neoehrlichia mikurensis</i>) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of <i>Bartonella</i> spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use (<i>e.g.,</i> urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"478-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2023.0151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2023.0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:城市地区是一个独特的生态系统,在物种丰度和组成方面与自然生态系统有着明显的差异。这些差异会影响病原体的传播动态,从而改变人畜共患病病原体的流行率和多样性。在这项研究中,我们对来自荷兰自然和城市地区的小型哺乳动物进行了筛查,以检测多达 19 种人畜共患病病原体,包括病毒、细菌和原生动物寄生虫。材料和方法:总共捕获了 578 只小型哺乳动物,包括林鼠(Apodemus sylvaticus)、滩田鼠(Myodes glareolus)、黄颈鼠(Apodemus flavicollis)、家鼠(Mus musculus)、普通田鼠(Microtus arvalis)和大白齿鼩(Crocidura russula)。我们在城市和自然区域的小型哺乳动物身上检测到了多种人畜共患病病原体。对于这些病原体的子集,即木鼠和田鼠,我们检验了病原体的流行率和多样性是否与栖息地类型(即自然栖息地和城市栖息地)、绿化程度以及各种宿主特征有关。结果蜱传人畜共患病病原体(鲍氏菌属和米库雷氏新欧氏菌)在自然区域的林鼠中的流行率明显较高。相比之下,城市地区的木鼠中巴氏杆菌的感染率较高,但这一差异在统计学上并不显著。来自自然栖息地的银行田鼠的病原体多样性较高,两种啮齿类动物的病原体多样性均随体重增加而增加,但银行田鼠的病原体多样性与性别有关。此外,我们还首次在荷兰的啮齿类动物中检测到耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、广谱β-内酰胺酶/产AmpC大肠杆菌和淋巴细胞性脉络膜炎病毒。讨论:自然和城市地区之间的差异可能与节肢动物病媒的数量和多样性以及脊椎动物群落组成的差异有关。随着环境侵蚀的加剧和城市土地利用的变化(如城市绿化),更好地了解人畜共患病病原体在城市环境中的传播动态以降低对公共健康的潜在疾病风险非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
T(r)icky Environments: Higher Prevalence of Tick-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Rodents from Natural Areas Compared with Urban Areas.

Background: Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. Materials and Methods: In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles (Myodes glareolus), yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis), house mice (Mus musculus), common voles (Microtus arvalis), and greater white-toothed shrews (Crocidura russula). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type (i.e., natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. Results: The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens (Borrelia spp. and Neoehrlichia mikurensis) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of Bartonella spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. Discussion: The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use (e.g., urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases is an authoritative, peer-reviewed journal providing basic and applied research on diseases transmitted to humans by invertebrate vectors or non-human vertebrates. The Journal examines geographic, seasonal, and other risk factors that influence the transmission, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this group of infectious diseases, and identifies global trends that have the potential to result in major epidemics. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases coverage includes: -Ecology -Entomology -Epidemiology -Infectious diseases -Microbiology -Parasitology -Pathology -Public health -Tropical medicine -Wildlife biology -Bacterial, rickettsial, viral, and parasitic zoonoses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信