{"title":"新发干眼症病例的中央角膜厚度：病例对照研究","authors":"Rekha Ghimire, Raju Kaiti, Manish Dahal, Sanjay Marasini","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Loss of homeostasis and chronic inflammation result in ocular surface damage in dry eyes, which is also associated with corneal thinning in established cases. Yet, the correlation between corneal thickness and new cases of dry eyes remains inadequately supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness of new cases of dry eyes to that of age- and gender-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 dry eye patients were compared with 61 age- and gender-matched non-dry eye individuals. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms, and the central corneal thickness was measured with a Nidek CEM-530 specular microscope. Patients were grouped based on disease severity (OSDI scores), and the clinical findings were compared between groups for slit-lamp examinations, Schirmer's I test, and tear film breakup time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0 to 32.0) and 27.0 (IQR, 20.0 to 32.0) years in the control and dry eye groups, respectively (p=0.63). The median (IQR) values of the OSDI scores, tear film breakup time scores, and Schirmer's test measurements in the control groups were 10.4 (8.3 to 10.4), 12.0 (11.0 to 14.0) seconds, and 16.0 (13.5 to 19.5) mm, respectively, which differed from the dry eye groups (p<0.0001). These values in the dry eye group were 29.1 (25.0 to 39.5), 4.0 (3.0 to 8.0) seconds, and 8.0 (3.5 to 11.0) mm, respectively. Patients with dry eyes had lower central corneal thickness than controls (p<0.01). The mean ± standard deviation central corneal thicknesses in patients with dry eyes and the control group were 520.3 ± 26.8 and 545.3 ± 18.8 μm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The central corneal thickness in dry eyes was significantly reduced compared with the control group. These findings may be useful in monitoring and managing dry eyes and should be considered in intraocular pressure measurements and refractive surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":"101 5","pages":"272-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central corneal thickness in new cases of dry eyes: A case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Rekha Ghimire, Raju Kaiti, Manish Dahal, Sanjay Marasini\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Loss of homeostasis and chronic inflammation result in ocular surface damage in dry eyes, which is also associated with corneal thinning in established cases. Yet, the correlation between corneal thickness and new cases of dry eyes remains inadequately supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness of new cases of dry eyes to that of age- and gender-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 dry eye patients were compared with 61 age- and gender-matched non-dry eye individuals. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms, and the central corneal thickness was measured with a Nidek CEM-530 specular microscope. Patients were grouped based on disease severity (OSDI scores), and the clinical findings were compared between groups for slit-lamp examinations, Schirmer's I test, and tear film breakup time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0 to 32.0) and 27.0 (IQR, 20.0 to 32.0) years in the control and dry eye groups, respectively (p=0.63). The median (IQR) values of the OSDI scores, tear film breakup time scores, and Schirmer's test measurements in the control groups were 10.4 (8.3 to 10.4), 12.0 (11.0 to 14.0) seconds, and 16.0 (13.5 to 19.5) mm, respectively, which differed from the dry eye groups (p<0.0001). These values in the dry eye group were 29.1 (25.0 to 39.5), 4.0 (3.0 to 8.0) seconds, and 8.0 (3.5 to 11.0) mm, respectively. Patients with dry eyes had lower central corneal thickness than controls (p<0.01). The mean ± standard deviation central corneal thicknesses in patients with dry eyes and the control group were 520.3 ± 26.8 and 545.3 ± 18.8 μm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The central corneal thickness in dry eyes was significantly reduced compared with the control group. These findings may be useful in monitoring and managing dry eyes and should be considered in intraocular pressure measurements and refractive surgical procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\"101 5\",\"pages\":\"272-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Central corneal thickness in new cases of dry eyes: A case-control study.
Significance: Loss of homeostasis and chronic inflammation result in ocular surface damage in dry eyes, which is also associated with corneal thinning in established cases. Yet, the correlation between corneal thickness and new cases of dry eyes remains inadequately supported by evidence.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness of new cases of dry eyes to that of age- and gender-matched controls.
Methods: A total of 45 dry eye patients were compared with 61 age- and gender-matched non-dry eye individuals. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms, and the central corneal thickness was measured with a Nidek CEM-530 specular microscope. Patients were grouped based on disease severity (OSDI scores), and the clinical findings were compared between groups for slit-lamp examinations, Schirmer's I test, and tear film breakup time.
Results: The median age of patients was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0 to 32.0) and 27.0 (IQR, 20.0 to 32.0) years in the control and dry eye groups, respectively (p=0.63). The median (IQR) values of the OSDI scores, tear film breakup time scores, and Schirmer's test measurements in the control groups were 10.4 (8.3 to 10.4), 12.0 (11.0 to 14.0) seconds, and 16.0 (13.5 to 19.5) mm, respectively, which differed from the dry eye groups (p<0.0001). These values in the dry eye group were 29.1 (25.0 to 39.5), 4.0 (3.0 to 8.0) seconds, and 8.0 (3.5 to 11.0) mm, respectively. Patients with dry eyes had lower central corneal thickness than controls (p<0.01). The mean ± standard deviation central corneal thicknesses in patients with dry eyes and the control group were 520.3 ± 26.8 and 545.3 ± 18.8 μm, respectively.
Conclusions: The central corneal thickness in dry eyes was significantly reduced compared with the control group. These findings may be useful in monitoring and managing dry eyes and should be considered in intraocular pressure measurements and refractive surgical procedures.
期刊介绍：
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
