ABCD 研究数据中将种族/族裔身份和类似精神病经历联系起来的环境风险因素和累积压力的证据。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Emily Petti, Jason Schiffman, Hans Oh, Nicole R Karcher
{"title":"ABCD 研究数据中将种族/族裔身份和类似精神病经历联系起来的环境风险因素和累积压力的证据。","authors":"Emily Petti, Jason Schiffman, Hans Oh, Nicole R Karcher","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous work has found increased endorsement of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) among marginalized racial and ethnic groups. According to social determinants frameworks, marginalized groups are at increased risk for exposure to socio-environmental risk factors, including systemic factors (eg, poverty and poor housing conditions) and social stressors (eg, discrimination). We examine the extent to which environmental risk factors and stress account for associations between racial/ethnic groups with PLEs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analyses included 11,876 young adolescents 9 to 10 years of age from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Mediation models assessed whether stress at 1-year follow-up indirectly linked baseline environmental risk to later distressing PLEs at 2-year follow-up. Serial mediation models examined whether environmental risk and stress indirectly accounted for variation among racial/ethnic groups in self-reported distressing PLEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through principal component and mediation analyses, we found evidence that the link between environmental risk (eg, poverty and exposure to crime) and distressing PLEs was mediated by stress. There was also evidence that higher endorsement of distressing PLEs within the Black and Hispanic groups was serially mediated by greater environmental risk and greater stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analyses provide evidence that the associations between marginalized racial and ethnic identities with the endorsement of PLEs partially reflects the sequelae of systemic socio-environmental factors. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon environmental risk factors to target the reduction of cumulative stress over time, which may in turn buffer against the development of PLEs.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Using longitudinal data from 11,876 young adolescents aged 9-10 from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, this study examined environmental (e.g., poverty) and stress-related factors (e.g., experiences of discrimination, childhood adversity) that are associated with psychotic-like experiences, and whether these factors explain racial/ethnic differences in psychotic-like experiences. The authors found evidence that the association between these environmental risk factors and psychotic-like experiences is partially explained by cumulative stress, and that differences in psychotic-like experiences across racial/ethnic groups were accounted for by both environmental risk factors and stress. Results highlight that systemic factors may explain higher levels of psychotic-like experiences among historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon modifiable risk factors to buffer against stress, and in turn, the development of psychotic-like experiences over time.</p><p><strong>Diversity inclusion statement: </strong>We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for Environmental Risk Factors and Cumulative Stress Linking Racial/Ethnic Identity and Psychotic-Like Experiences in ABCD Study Data.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Petti, Jason Schiffman, Hans Oh, Nicole R Karcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous work has found increased endorsement of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) among marginalized racial and ethnic groups. According to social determinants frameworks, marginalized groups are at increased risk for exposure to socio-environmental risk factors, including systemic factors (eg, poverty and poor housing conditions) and social stressors (eg, discrimination). We examine the extent to which environmental risk factors and stress account for associations between racial/ethnic groups with PLEs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analyses included 11,876 young adolescents 9 to 10 years of age from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Mediation models assessed whether stress at 1-year follow-up indirectly linked baseline environmental risk to later distressing PLEs at 2-year follow-up. Serial mediation models examined whether environmental risk and stress indirectly accounted for variation among racial/ethnic groups in self-reported distressing PLEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through principal component and mediation analyses, we found evidence that the link between environmental risk (eg, poverty and exposure to crime) and distressing PLEs was mediated by stress. There was also evidence that higher endorsement of distressing PLEs within the Black and Hispanic groups was serially mediated by greater environmental risk and greater stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analyses provide evidence that the associations between marginalized racial and ethnic identities with the endorsement of PLEs partially reflects the sequelae of systemic socio-environmental factors. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon environmental risk factors to target the reduction of cumulative stress over time, which may in turn buffer against the development of PLEs.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Using longitudinal data from 11,876 young adolescents aged 9-10 from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, this study examined environmental (e.g., poverty) and stress-related factors (e.g., experiences of discrimination, childhood adversity) that are associated with psychotic-like experiences, and whether these factors explain racial/ethnic differences in psychotic-like experiences. The authors found evidence that the association between these environmental risk factors and psychotic-like experiences is partially explained by cumulative stress, and that differences in psychotic-like experiences across racial/ethnic groups were accounted for by both environmental risk factors and stress. Results highlight that systemic factors may explain higher levels of psychotic-like experiences among historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon modifiable risk factors to buffer against stress, and in turn, the development of psychotic-like experiences over time.</p><p><strong>Diversity inclusion statement: </strong>We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以往的研究发现,边缘化种族和民族群体中对类似精神病经历(PLEs)的认同度有所提高。根据社会决定因素框架,边缘化群体暴露于社会环境风险因素(包括系统性因素,如贫困和恶劣的住房条件)和社会压力因素(如歧视)的风险更高。我们研究了环境风险因素和压力在多大程度上导致了种族/民族群体与 PLEs 之间的关联:分析对象包括青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中的 11876 名 9-10 岁青少年。中介模型评估了 1 年随访时的压力是否间接地将基线环境风险与 2 年随访时的令人痛苦的 PLEs 联系起来。序列中介模型检验了环境风险和压力是否间接导致了种族/民族群体之间在自我报告的困扰性 PLEs 方面的差异:通过主成分分析和中介分析,我们发现有证据表明环境风险(如贫困和犯罪风险)与类似精神病的痛苦经历之间的联系是由压力中介的。还有证据表明,在黑人和西班牙裔群体中,较高的苦恼性精神病样体验认可度是由更大的环境风险和更大的压力连续中介的:分析结果证明,边缘化种族和民族身份与 PLEs 认同之间的关联部分反映了系统性社会环境因素的后遗症。研究结果表明,有可能对环境风险因素进行干预,以减少长期累积的压力,进而缓冲 PLEs 的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for Environmental Risk Factors and Cumulative Stress Linking Racial/Ethnic Identity and Psychotic-Like Experiences in ABCD Study Data.

Objective: Previous work has found increased endorsement of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) among marginalized racial and ethnic groups. According to social determinants frameworks, marginalized groups are at increased risk for exposure to socio-environmental risk factors, including systemic factors (eg, poverty and poor housing conditions) and social stressors (eg, discrimination). We examine the extent to which environmental risk factors and stress account for associations between racial/ethnic groups with PLEs.

Method: Analyses included 11,876 young adolescents 9 to 10 years of age from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Mediation models assessed whether stress at 1-year follow-up indirectly linked baseline environmental risk to later distressing PLEs at 2-year follow-up. Serial mediation models examined whether environmental risk and stress indirectly accounted for variation among racial/ethnic groups in self-reported distressing PLEs.

Results: Through principal component and mediation analyses, we found evidence that the link between environmental risk (eg, poverty and exposure to crime) and distressing PLEs was mediated by stress. There was also evidence that higher endorsement of distressing PLEs within the Black and Hispanic groups was serially mediated by greater environmental risk and greater stress.

Conclusion: The analyses provide evidence that the associations between marginalized racial and ethnic identities with the endorsement of PLEs partially reflects the sequelae of systemic socio-environmental factors. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon environmental risk factors to target the reduction of cumulative stress over time, which may in turn buffer against the development of PLEs.

Plain language summary: Using longitudinal data from 11,876 young adolescents aged 9-10 from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, this study examined environmental (e.g., poverty) and stress-related factors (e.g., experiences of discrimination, childhood adversity) that are associated with psychotic-like experiences, and whether these factors explain racial/ethnic differences in psychotic-like experiences. The authors found evidence that the association between these environmental risk factors and psychotic-like experiences is partially explained by cumulative stress, and that differences in psychotic-like experiences across racial/ethnic groups were accounted for by both environmental risk factors and stress. Results highlight that systemic factors may explain higher levels of psychotic-like experiences among historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. Findings suggest the potential for intervening upon modifiable risk factors to buffer against stress, and in turn, the development of psychotic-like experiences over time.

Diversity inclusion statement: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信