从土块中观模型了解农业硝酸盐沥滤。

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Holly Loper, Carlos Tenesaca, Carl Pederson, Matthew J. Helmers, William G. Crumpton, Dean Lemke, Steven J. Hall
{"title":"从土块中观模型了解农业硝酸盐沥滤。","authors":"Holly Loper,&nbsp;Carlos Tenesaca,&nbsp;Carl Pederson,&nbsp;Matthew J. Helmers,&nbsp;William G. Crumpton,&nbsp;Dean Lemke,&nbsp;Steven J. Hall","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantifying nitrate leaching in agricultural fields is often complicated by inability to capture all water draining through a specific area. We designed and tested undisturbed soil monoliths (termed “soil block mesocosms”) to achieve complete collection of drainage. Each mesocosm measures 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.2 m and is enclosed by steel on the sides and bottom with a single outlet to collect drainage. We compared measurements from replicate mesocosms planted to corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) with a nearby field experiment with tile-drained plots (“drainage plots”), and with drainage from nearby watersheds from 2020 through 2022 under drought conditions. Annual mesocosm drainage volumes were 6.5–24.6 cm greater than from the drainage plots, likely because the mesocosms were isolated from the subsoil and could not store groundwater below the drain depth, whereas the drainage plots accumulated infiltration as groundwater. Thus, we obtained consistent nitrate leaching measurements from the mesocosms even when some drainage plots yielded no water. Despite drainage volume differences, mean flow-weighted nitrate concentrations were similar between mesocosms and drainage plots in 2 of 3 years. Mesocosm annual drainage volume was 8.7 cm lower to 16.7 cm higher than watershed drainage, likely due to lagged influences of groundwater. Corn yields were lower in mesocosms than drainage plots in 2020, but with irrigation, yields were similar in subsequent years. Mean 2020 surface soil moisture and temperature were similar between the mesocosms and nearby fields. Based on these comparisons, the mesocosms provide a robust method to measure nitrate leaching with lower variability than field plots.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"53 4","pages":"508-520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on agricultural nitrate leaching from soil block mesocosms\",\"authors\":\"Holly Loper,&nbsp;Carlos Tenesaca,&nbsp;Carl Pederson,&nbsp;Matthew J. Helmers,&nbsp;William G. Crumpton,&nbsp;Dean Lemke,&nbsp;Steven J. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.20586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Quantifying nitrate leaching in agricultural fields is often complicated by inability to capture all water draining through a specific area. We designed and tested undisturbed soil monoliths (termed “soil block mesocosms”) to achieve complete collection of drainage. Each mesocosm measures 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.2 m and is enclosed by steel on the sides and bottom with a single outlet to collect drainage. We compared measurements from replicate mesocosms planted to corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) with a nearby field experiment with tile-drained plots (“drainage plots”), and with drainage from nearby watersheds from 2020 through 2022 under drought conditions. Annual mesocosm drainage volumes were 6.5–24.6 cm greater than from the drainage plots, likely because the mesocosms were isolated from the subsoil and could not store groundwater below the drain depth, whereas the drainage plots accumulated infiltration as groundwater. Thus, we obtained consistent nitrate leaching measurements from the mesocosms even when some drainage plots yielded no water. Despite drainage volume differences, mean flow-weighted nitrate concentrations were similar between mesocosms and drainage plots in 2 of 3 years. Mesocosm annual drainage volume was 8.7 cm lower to 16.7 cm higher than watershed drainage, likely due to lagged influences of groundwater. Corn yields were lower in mesocosms than drainage plots in 2020, but with irrigation, yields were similar in subsequent years. Mean 2020 surface soil moisture and temperature were similar between the mesocosms and nearby fields. Based on these comparisons, the mesocosms provide a robust method to measure nitrate leaching with lower variability than field plots.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"508-520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20586\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对农田硝酸盐沥滤进行量化通常会因无法收集特定区域的所有排水而变得复杂。我们设计并测试了不受干扰的土壤单体(称为 "土块中间样态"),以实现对排水的全面收集。每个介观模型的尺寸为 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.2 m,侧面和底部由钢筋围成,只有一个出口收集排水。从 2020 年到 2022 年,在干旱条件下,我们比较了种植玉米(玉米)的重复中间膜的测量结果、附近田间试验的瓦片排水地块("排水地块")的测量结果以及附近流域的排水情况。中间膜的年排水量比排水地块的年排水量大 6.5-24.6 厘米,这可能是因为中间膜与底土隔离,无法将地下水储存在排水深度以下,而排水地块则将渗入的地下水累积为地下水。因此,即使有些排水地块没有出水,我们也能从中间培养槽中获得一致的硝酸盐沥滤测量结果。尽管排水量存在差异,但在 3 年中的 2 年,中层池和排水地块的平均流量加权硝酸盐浓度相似。中观生态系的年排水量比流域排水量低 8.7 厘米到高 16.7 厘米,这可能是由于地下水的滞后影响。2020 年,中观模型中的玉米产量低于排水地块,但通过灌溉,随后几年的产量相近。2020 年的平均地表土壤湿度和温度在中置培养箱和附近田地之间相似。根据这些比较,中置培养箱提供了一种测量硝酸盐沥滤的可靠方法,其变异性低于田间地块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insights on agricultural nitrate leaching from soil block mesocosms

Insights on agricultural nitrate leaching from soil block mesocosms

Quantifying nitrate leaching in agricultural fields is often complicated by inability to capture all water draining through a specific area. We designed and tested undisturbed soil monoliths (termed “soil block mesocosms”) to achieve complete collection of drainage. Each mesocosm measures 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.2 m and is enclosed by steel on the sides and bottom with a single outlet to collect drainage. We compared measurements from replicate mesocosms planted to corn (Zea mays L.) with a nearby field experiment with tile-drained plots (“drainage plots”), and with drainage from nearby watersheds from 2020 through 2022 under drought conditions. Annual mesocosm drainage volumes were 6.5–24.6 cm greater than from the drainage plots, likely because the mesocosms were isolated from the subsoil and could not store groundwater below the drain depth, whereas the drainage plots accumulated infiltration as groundwater. Thus, we obtained consistent nitrate leaching measurements from the mesocosms even when some drainage plots yielded no water. Despite drainage volume differences, mean flow-weighted nitrate concentrations were similar between mesocosms and drainage plots in 2 of 3 years. Mesocosm annual drainage volume was 8.7 cm lower to 16.7 cm higher than watershed drainage, likely due to lagged influences of groundwater. Corn yields were lower in mesocosms than drainage plots in 2020, but with irrigation, yields were similar in subsequent years. Mean 2020 surface soil moisture and temperature were similar between the mesocosms and nearby fields. Based on these comparisons, the mesocosms provide a robust method to measure nitrate leaching with lower variability than field plots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信