Habeeb Tajudeen, Abdolreza Hosseindoust, Sanghun Ha, Junyoung Mun, Serin Park, Kwangmun Kim, Raquel Rodríguez, Jinsoo Kim
{"title":"恒温和肠溶复合蛋白酶对饲喂低蛋白日粮的蛋鸡生产性能和消化率的影响","authors":"Habeeb Tajudeen, Abdolreza Hosseindoust, Sanghun Ha, Junyoung Mun, Serin Park, Kwangmun Kim, Raquel Rodríguez, Jinsoo Kim","doi":"10.1111/jpn.13993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the efficacy of a multi-protease on the performance, egg quality and digestibility of laying hen. The study had four treatments: Control (without multi-protease, CON), Pro 1.2 (CON + 0.1% multi-protease), Pro 2.4 (CON + 0.2% multi-protease) and Pro 3.6 (CON + 0.3% multi-protease). Each treatment was replicated six times (replicate = experimental unit = one pen with 15 hens) to give a total of 360 layer hens of the Hy-line breed. The study lasted for a total of 3 months (14 day adaptation period + 84 days experimental period). The effects of the additive were assessed on: the performance variables, egg quality and ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility. At the end of the study, dietary supplementation with Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) hen-day egg production, egg mass and eggshell thickness compared with CON at the peak phase. Further improvements (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed in the digestibility of crude protein and AAs such as isoleucine, lysine, threonine and cysteine at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 protease supplementation levels compared with CON, while arginine and alanine were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at Pro 3.6 compared with CON. No differences were reported for other performances such as body weight, average daily feed intake, average egg weight, feed conversion ratio, eggshell hardness and all the egg qualities measured. Overall, the results from this study showed better efficacy at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 on the performance of laying hen during the peak phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":"108 5","pages":"1554-1561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of thermostable and enteric-coated multi-protease on the performance and digestibility of laying hen fed low-protein diets\",\"authors\":\"Habeeb Tajudeen, Abdolreza Hosseindoust, Sanghun Ha, Junyoung Mun, Serin Park, Kwangmun Kim, Raquel Rodríguez, Jinsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpn.13993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluated the efficacy of a multi-protease on the performance, egg quality and digestibility of laying hen. The study had four treatments: Control (without multi-protease, CON), Pro 1.2 (CON + 0.1% multi-protease), Pro 2.4 (CON + 0.2% multi-protease) and Pro 3.6 (CON + 0.3% multi-protease). Each treatment was replicated six times (replicate = experimental unit = one pen with 15 hens) to give a total of 360 layer hens of the Hy-line breed. The study lasted for a total of 3 months (14 day adaptation period + 84 days experimental period). The effects of the additive were assessed on: the performance variables, egg quality and ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility. At the end of the study, dietary supplementation with Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) hen-day egg production, egg mass and eggshell thickness compared with CON at the peak phase. Further improvements (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed in the digestibility of crude protein and AAs such as isoleucine, lysine, threonine and cysteine at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 protease supplementation levels compared with CON, while arginine and alanine were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at Pro 3.6 compared with CON. No differences were reported for other performances such as body weight, average daily feed intake, average egg weight, feed conversion ratio, eggshell hardness and all the egg qualities measured. Overall, the results from this study showed better efficacy at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 on the performance of laying hen during the peak phase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"108 5\",\"pages\":\"1554-1561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.13993\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.13993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了多种蛋白酶对蛋鸡生产性能、鸡蛋质量和消化率的影响。该研究有四种处理方法:对照组(无复合蛋白酶,CON)、Pro 1.2(CON + 0.1%复合蛋白酶)、Pro 2.4(CON + 0.2%复合蛋白酶)和 Pro 3.6(CON + 0.3%复合蛋白酶)。每种处理重复六次(重复=实验单位=一个有 15 只母鸡的鸡栏),总共有 360 只 Hy-line 品种的蛋鸡参与实验。研究总共持续了 3 个月(14 天适应期 + 84 天实验期)。研究评估了添加剂对性能变量、鸡蛋质量和回肠氨基酸(AA)消化率的影响。在研究结束时,日粮中添加 Pro 2.4 和 Pro 3.6 可提高(p
The effect of thermostable and enteric-coated multi-protease on the performance and digestibility of laying hen fed low-protein diets
This study evaluated the efficacy of a multi-protease on the performance, egg quality and digestibility of laying hen. The study had four treatments: Control (without multi-protease, CON), Pro 1.2 (CON + 0.1% multi-protease), Pro 2.4 (CON + 0.2% multi-protease) and Pro 3.6 (CON + 0.3% multi-protease). Each treatment was replicated six times (replicate = experimental unit = one pen with 15 hens) to give a total of 360 layer hens of the Hy-line breed. The study lasted for a total of 3 months (14 day adaptation period + 84 days experimental period). The effects of the additive were assessed on: the performance variables, egg quality and ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility. At the end of the study, dietary supplementation with Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 improved (p < 0.05) hen-day egg production, egg mass and eggshell thickness compared with CON at the peak phase. Further improvements (p < 0.05) were observed in the digestibility of crude protein and AAs such as isoleucine, lysine, threonine and cysteine at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 protease supplementation levels compared with CON, while arginine and alanine were higher (p < 0.05) at Pro 3.6 compared with CON. No differences were reported for other performances such as body weight, average daily feed intake, average egg weight, feed conversion ratio, eggshell hardness and all the egg qualities measured. Overall, the results from this study showed better efficacy at Pro 2.4 and Pro 3.6 on the performance of laying hen during the peak phase.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.