探索临床和人口特征对虚拟现实认知行为疗法治疗精神病效果的影响:调节分析

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
M Berkhof, E C D van der Stouwe, R M C A Pot-Kolder, M van der Gaag, W Veling, C N W Geraets
{"title":"探索临床和人口特征对虚拟现实认知行为疗法治疗精神病效果的影响:调节分析","authors":"M Berkhof, E C D van der Stouwe, R M C A Pot-Kolder, M van der Gaag, W Veling, C N W Geraets","doi":"10.1111/acps.13713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual Reality cognitive behavioral therapy (VR-CBT) has proven to be an effective treatment method for paranoia and anxiety in psychosis. However, it is unknown, which individuals benefit most from VR-CBT. Previous studies examined factors affecting the treatment effect of regular CBTp, including illness duration, paranoia, depression, and pre-therapy avoidance behaviors, but results are inconsistent. The study aims to investigate the factors that influence the effectiveness of VR-CBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 participants with a psychotic disorder and at least moderate paranoia (GTPS >40) were included in this explorative study. Data were collected as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which participants were assigned to VR-CBT or treatment as usual (TAU). The VR-CBT group received 16 sessions of individual treatment. A moderator analysis was conducted to examine the influence of baseline demographic (age, gender, and education level) and clinical characteristics (duration of illness, paranoia, anxiety, depression, safety behavior, self-esteem, and social functioning) on treatment effects of paranoia and anxiety as measured with questionnaires and the experience sampling method (ESM) directly after treatment (12 weeks after baseline).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More use of safety behavior at baseline resulted in greater benefits of VR-CBT on paranoid ideation and ESM paranoia. A higher age was associated with greater benefits of VR-CBT on social anxiety but not paranoia outcomes. There was no consistent evidence of moderation by any of the other sociodemographic or clinical variables for paranoid ideation and social anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that a diverse spectrum of patients, with different backgrounds and symptom severity may be able to benefit from VR-CBT. VR-CBT can be recommended to a broad spectrum of patients with psychotic disorders, and particularly those with high levels of safety behaviors, including severe avoidance, seem to benefit more.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the role of clinical and demographic characteristics on the effects of virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: A moderator analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Berkhof, E C D van der Stouwe, R M C A Pot-Kolder, M van der Gaag, W Veling, C N W Geraets\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual Reality cognitive behavioral therapy (VR-CBT) has proven to be an effective treatment method for paranoia and anxiety in psychosis. However, it is unknown, which individuals benefit most from VR-CBT. Previous studies examined factors affecting the treatment effect of regular CBTp, including illness duration, paranoia, depression, and pre-therapy avoidance behaviors, but results are inconsistent. The study aims to investigate the factors that influence the effectiveness of VR-CBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 participants with a psychotic disorder and at least moderate paranoia (GTPS >40) were included in this explorative study. Data were collected as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which participants were assigned to VR-CBT or treatment as usual (TAU). The VR-CBT group received 16 sessions of individual treatment. A moderator analysis was conducted to examine the influence of baseline demographic (age, gender, and education level) and clinical characteristics (duration of illness, paranoia, anxiety, depression, safety behavior, self-esteem, and social functioning) on treatment effects of paranoia and anxiety as measured with questionnaires and the experience sampling method (ESM) directly after treatment (12 weeks after baseline).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More use of safety behavior at baseline resulted in greater benefits of VR-CBT on paranoid ideation and ESM paranoia. A higher age was associated with greater benefits of VR-CBT on social anxiety but not paranoia outcomes. There was no consistent evidence of moderation by any of the other sociodemographic or clinical variables for paranoid ideation and social anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that a diverse spectrum of patients, with different backgrounds and symptom severity may be able to benefit from VR-CBT. VR-CBT can be recommended to a broad spectrum of patients with psychotic disorders, and particularly those with high levels of safety behaviors, including severe avoidance, seem to benefit more.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13713\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟现实认知行为疗法(VR-CBT虚拟现实认知行为疗法(VR-CBT)已被证明是治疗精神病患者妄想症和焦虑症的有效方法。然而,哪些人从虚拟现实认知行为疗法中获益最多,目前尚不清楚。之前的研究考察了影响常规 CBTp 治疗效果的因素,包括病程、妄想症、抑郁和治疗前的回避行为,但结果并不一致。本研究旨在调查影响 VR-CBT 效果的因素:本探索性研究共纳入了 95 名患有精神障碍且至少患有中度妄想症(GTPS >40)的参与者。数据收集是一项多中心随机对照试验的一部分,参与者被分配到 VR-CBT 或常规治疗(TAU)组。VR-CBT 组接受了 16 次个别治疗。研究人员对基线人口统计学特征(年龄、性别和教育水平)和临床特征(病程、偏执、焦虑、抑郁、安全行为、自尊和社会功能)进行了调节因子分析,以研究治疗后(基线12周后)直接使用调查问卷和经验取样法(ESM)测量的偏执和焦虑对治疗效果的影响:结果:基线时更多地使用安全行为会使 VR-CBT 对妄想症和 ESM 偏执症产生更大的益处。年龄越大,VR-CBT 对社交焦虑的疗效越大,但对妄想症的疗效不大。没有一致的证据表明其他社会人口学或临床变量对妄想症和社交焦虑有调节作用:我们的研究结果表明,不同背景和症状严重程度的患者都可能从 VR-CBT 中受益。VR-CBT可推荐给广泛的精神障碍患者,尤其是那些具有高度安全行为(包括严重回避)的患者,似乎更容易从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the role of clinical and demographic characteristics on the effects of virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: A moderator analysis.

Background: Virtual Reality cognitive behavioral therapy (VR-CBT) has proven to be an effective treatment method for paranoia and anxiety in psychosis. However, it is unknown, which individuals benefit most from VR-CBT. Previous studies examined factors affecting the treatment effect of regular CBTp, including illness duration, paranoia, depression, and pre-therapy avoidance behaviors, but results are inconsistent. The study aims to investigate the factors that influence the effectiveness of VR-CBT.

Methods: A total of 95 participants with a psychotic disorder and at least moderate paranoia (GTPS >40) were included in this explorative study. Data were collected as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which participants were assigned to VR-CBT or treatment as usual (TAU). The VR-CBT group received 16 sessions of individual treatment. A moderator analysis was conducted to examine the influence of baseline demographic (age, gender, and education level) and clinical characteristics (duration of illness, paranoia, anxiety, depression, safety behavior, self-esteem, and social functioning) on treatment effects of paranoia and anxiety as measured with questionnaires and the experience sampling method (ESM) directly after treatment (12 weeks after baseline).

Results: More use of safety behavior at baseline resulted in greater benefits of VR-CBT on paranoid ideation and ESM paranoia. A higher age was associated with greater benefits of VR-CBT on social anxiety but not paranoia outcomes. There was no consistent evidence of moderation by any of the other sociodemographic or clinical variables for paranoid ideation and social anxiety.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a diverse spectrum of patients, with different backgrounds and symptom severity may be able to benefit from VR-CBT. VR-CBT can be recommended to a broad spectrum of patients with psychotic disorders, and particularly those with high levels of safety behaviors, including severe avoidance, seem to benefit more.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信