纵向应变与 6 分钟步行距离相关,而射血分数和舒张参数则不相关。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
John W Petersen, Natalie Bracewell, Kevin M Schneider, Joshua Latner, Shuang Yang, Yi Guo
{"title":"纵向应变与 6 分钟步行距离相关,而射血分数和舒张参数则不相关。","authors":"John W Petersen, Natalie Bracewell, Kevin M Schneider, Joshua Latner, Shuang Yang, Yi Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12947-024-00325-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired functional capacity is a common symptom in patients with heart failure. Standard measures of left ventricular (LV) function, such as ejection fraction (EF) and LV diastolic parameters, do not correlate with measures of functional capacity. The aim of this study is to determine if measures of global and regional LV strain better correlate with 6-minute walk distance than does EF or measures of LV diastolic function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>120 patients referred to a cardiology clinic for evaluation of known or suspected heart failure were approached for enrollment. Of those 120 patients, 58 had an echocardiogram within 3 months of enrollment with images adequate for regional and global strain assessment, had no contra-indication to exercise testing, and had no previously documented non-cardiac explanation for dyspnea on exertion. In those 58 patients, 6-minute walk distance was measured, LV EF was determined with Simpson's biplane method, and global and regional longitudinal strain were measured with TomTec Image Arena 4.5.1 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LV EF had no correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.22, p = 0.09) even when controlling for age, gender, and BMI (p = 0.07). No measures of LV diastolic function (including E velocity, Deceleration Time, e' annular velocities, or E/e') had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Multiple measures of global and regional LV longitudinal systolic function had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Longitudinal strain of the basal LV segments had the strongest correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r= -0.36, p = 0.005), and correlation persisted after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longitudinal strain correlates with a measure of functional capacity, but LVEF and traditional measures of LV diastolic dysfunction do not. Measures of longitudinal strain, especially in basal LV segments, will likely be an important marker of clinically relevant LV function.</p>","PeriodicalId":9613,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","volume":"22 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal strain correlates with 6-minute walk distance whereas ejection fraction and diastolic parameters do not.\",\"authors\":\"John W Petersen, Natalie Bracewell, Kevin M Schneider, Joshua Latner, Shuang Yang, Yi Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12947-024-00325-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired functional capacity is a common symptom in patients with heart failure. Standard measures of left ventricular (LV) function, such as ejection fraction (EF) and LV diastolic parameters, do not correlate with measures of functional capacity. The aim of this study is to determine if measures of global and regional LV strain better correlate with 6-minute walk distance than does EF or measures of LV diastolic function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>120 patients referred to a cardiology clinic for evaluation of known or suspected heart failure were approached for enrollment. Of those 120 patients, 58 had an echocardiogram within 3 months of enrollment with images adequate for regional and global strain assessment, had no contra-indication to exercise testing, and had no previously documented non-cardiac explanation for dyspnea on exertion. In those 58 patients, 6-minute walk distance was measured, LV EF was determined with Simpson's biplane method, and global and regional longitudinal strain were measured with TomTec Image Arena 4.5.1 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LV EF had no correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.22, p = 0.09) even when controlling for age, gender, and BMI (p = 0.07). No measures of LV diastolic function (including E velocity, Deceleration Time, e' annular velocities, or E/e') had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Multiple measures of global and regional LV longitudinal systolic function had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Longitudinal strain of the basal LV segments had the strongest correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r= -0.36, p = 0.005), and correlation persisted after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longitudinal strain correlates with a measure of functional capacity, but LVEF and traditional measures of LV diastolic dysfunction do not. Measures of longitudinal strain, especially in basal LV segments, will likely be an important marker of clinically relevant LV function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-024-00325-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-024-00325-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能受损是心力衰竭患者的常见症状。左心室(LV)功能的标准测量指标,如射血分数(EF)和左心室舒张参数,与功能能力的测量指标并不相关。本研究的目的是确定与射血分数或左心室舒张功能指标相比,整体和区域左心室应变指标与 6 分钟步行距离的相关性是否更好。在这 120 名患者中,有 58 人在入组 3 个月内接受过超声心动图检查,其图像足以进行区域和整体应变评估,没有运动测试禁忌症,且之前没有记录显示劳累时呼吸困难的非心脏原因。在这58名患者中,测量了6分钟步行距离,用辛普森双平面法测定了左心室EF,用TomTec Image Arena 4.5.1软件测量了整体和区域纵向应变:结果:即使控制了年龄、性别和体重指数(p = 0.07),左心室EF与6分钟步行距离也没有相关性(r = 0.22,p = 0.09)。左心室舒张功能的测量指标(包括E速度、减速时间、e'环速度或E/e')均与6分钟步行距离无关。多项测量整体和区域左心室纵向收缩功能的指标与 6 分钟步行距离存在相关性。左心室基底段纵向应变与6分钟步行距离的相关性最强(r= -0.36,p = 0.005),在控制年龄、性别、体重指数和收缩压后,相关性仍然存在(p = 0.004):结论:纵向应变与功能容量的测量结果相关,但 LVEF 和左心室舒张功能障碍的传统测量结果不相关。纵向应变的测量,尤其是左心室基底段的测量,很可能成为临床相关左心室功能的重要标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal strain correlates with 6-minute walk distance whereas ejection fraction and diastolic parameters do not.

Background: Impaired functional capacity is a common symptom in patients with heart failure. Standard measures of left ventricular (LV) function, such as ejection fraction (EF) and LV diastolic parameters, do not correlate with measures of functional capacity. The aim of this study is to determine if measures of global and regional LV strain better correlate with 6-minute walk distance than does EF or measures of LV diastolic function.

Methods: 120 patients referred to a cardiology clinic for evaluation of known or suspected heart failure were approached for enrollment. Of those 120 patients, 58 had an echocardiogram within 3 months of enrollment with images adequate for regional and global strain assessment, had no contra-indication to exercise testing, and had no previously documented non-cardiac explanation for dyspnea on exertion. In those 58 patients, 6-minute walk distance was measured, LV EF was determined with Simpson's biplane method, and global and regional longitudinal strain were measured with TomTec Image Arena 4.5.1 software.

Results: LV EF had no correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.22, p = 0.09) even when controlling for age, gender, and BMI (p = 0.07). No measures of LV diastolic function (including E velocity, Deceleration Time, e' annular velocities, or E/e') had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Multiple measures of global and regional LV longitudinal systolic function had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Longitudinal strain of the basal LV segments had the strongest correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r= -0.36, p = 0.005), and correlation persisted after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Longitudinal strain correlates with a measure of functional capacity, but LVEF and traditional measures of LV diastolic dysfunction do not. Measures of longitudinal strain, especially in basal LV segments, will likely be an important marker of clinically relevant LV function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Cardiovascular Ultrasound CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Ultrasound is an online journal, publishing peer-reviewed: original research; authoritative reviews; case reports on challenging and/or unusual diagnostic aspects; and expert opinions on new techniques and technologies. We are particularly interested in articles that include relevant images or video files, which provide an additional dimension to published articles and enhance understanding. As an open access journal, Cardiovascular Ultrasound ensures high visibility for authors in addition to providing an up-to-date and freely available resource for the community. The journal welcomes discussion, and provides a forum for publishing opinion and debate ranging from biology to engineering to clinical echocardiography, with both speed and versatility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信