可持续过程化学开发的基准战略:以人为本、机器学习和量子力学

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
A. Filipa Almeida, Sofia Branco, Luisa C. R. Carvalho, Andre Raposo Moreira Dias, Emília P. T. Leitão, Rui M. S. Loureiro, Susana D. Lucas, Ricardo F. Mendonça, Rudi Oliveira, Inês L. D. Rocha, Joao Sardinha, Saúl Silva, Luís M. S. Sobral, Nuno M. T. Lourenço and Pedro C. Valente*, 
{"title":"可持续过程化学开发的基准战略:以人为本、机器学习和量子力学","authors":"A. Filipa Almeida,&nbsp;Sofia Branco,&nbsp;Luisa C. R. Carvalho,&nbsp;Andre Raposo Moreira Dias,&nbsp;Emília P. T. Leitão,&nbsp;Rui M. S. Loureiro,&nbsp;Susana D. Lucas,&nbsp;Ricardo F. Mendonça,&nbsp;Rudi Oliveira,&nbsp;Inês L. D. Rocha,&nbsp;Joao Sardinha,&nbsp;Saúl Silva,&nbsp;Luís M. S. Sobral,&nbsp;Nuno M. T. Lourenço and Pedro C. Valente*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study benchmarks diverse strategies in sustainable process chemistry development, ranging from human subject matter expertise to advanced computational models, including machine learning, Bayesian optimization, and quantum mechanics simulations. Through a “virtual laboratory” case study simulating a Pd-catalyzed C–H arylation reaction, the efficiency, sustainability, and practical application of these methodologies were compared. The study highlights the nuanced interplay between traditional expertise and computational tools, offering insights into their complementary roles in accelerating development and achieving green-by-design principles in pharmaceutical synthesis. Our findings suggest that no single approach universally outperforms others; instead, a hybrid strategy leveraging both human intuition and computational power appears to be the most promising approach when combining powerful tools in the complex field of modern organic synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Strategies of Sustainable Process Chemistry Development: Human-Based, Machine Learning, and Quantum Mechanics\",\"authors\":\"A. Filipa Almeida,&nbsp;Sofia Branco,&nbsp;Luisa C. R. Carvalho,&nbsp;Andre Raposo Moreira Dias,&nbsp;Emília P. T. Leitão,&nbsp;Rui M. S. Loureiro,&nbsp;Susana D. Lucas,&nbsp;Ricardo F. Mendonça,&nbsp;Rudi Oliveira,&nbsp;Inês L. D. Rocha,&nbsp;Joao Sardinha,&nbsp;Saúl Silva,&nbsp;Luís M. S. Sobral,&nbsp;Nuno M. T. Lourenço and Pedro C. Valente*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study benchmarks diverse strategies in sustainable process chemistry development, ranging from human subject matter expertise to advanced computational models, including machine learning, Bayesian optimization, and quantum mechanics simulations. Through a “virtual laboratory” case study simulating a Pd-catalyzed C–H arylation reaction, the efficiency, sustainability, and practical application of these methodologies were compared. The study highlights the nuanced interplay between traditional expertise and computational tools, offering insights into their complementary roles in accelerating development and achieving green-by-design principles in pharmaceutical synthesis. Our findings suggest that no single approach universally outperforms others; instead, a hybrid strategy leveraging both human intuition and computational power appears to be the most promising approach when combining powerful tools in the complex field of modern organic synthesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对可持续工艺化学开发中的各种策略进行了基准测试,包括从人类主题专业知识到先进计算模型(包括机器学习、贝叶斯优化和量子力学模拟)。通过模拟 Pd 催化 C-H 芳基化反应的 "虚拟实验室 "案例研究,比较了这些方法的效率、可持续性和实际应用。这项研究强调了传统专业知识与计算工具之间微妙的相互作用,深入探讨了它们在加速药物合成的开发和实现绿色设计原则方面的互补作用。我们的研究结果表明,没有任何一种方法能普遍优于其他方法;相反,在现代有机合成的复杂领域中,利用人类直觉和计算能力的混合策略似乎是结合强大工具的最有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benchmarking Strategies of Sustainable Process Chemistry Development: Human-Based, Machine Learning, and Quantum Mechanics

Benchmarking Strategies of Sustainable Process Chemistry Development: Human-Based, Machine Learning, and Quantum Mechanics

Benchmarking Strategies of Sustainable Process Chemistry Development: Human-Based, Machine Learning, and Quantum Mechanics

This study benchmarks diverse strategies in sustainable process chemistry development, ranging from human subject matter expertise to advanced computational models, including machine learning, Bayesian optimization, and quantum mechanics simulations. Through a “virtual laboratory” case study simulating a Pd-catalyzed C–H arylation reaction, the efficiency, sustainability, and practical application of these methodologies were compared. The study highlights the nuanced interplay between traditional expertise and computational tools, offering insights into their complementary roles in accelerating development and achieving green-by-design principles in pharmaceutical synthesis. Our findings suggest that no single approach universally outperforms others; instead, a hybrid strategy leveraging both human intuition and computational power appears to be the most promising approach when combining powerful tools in the complex field of modern organic synthesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
251
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信