未来安全气候的不确定途径

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1029/2023EF004297
S. C. Sherwood, G. Hegerl, P. Braconnot, P. Friedlingstein, H. Goelzer, N. R. P. Harris, E. Holland, H. Kim, M. Mitchell, T. Naish, P. Nobre, B. L. Otto-Bliesner, K. A. Reed, J. Renwick, N. P. M. van der Wel
{"title":"未来安全气候的不确定途径","authors":"S. C. Sherwood,&nbsp;G. Hegerl,&nbsp;P. Braconnot,&nbsp;P. Friedlingstein,&nbsp;H. Goelzer,&nbsp;N. R. P. Harris,&nbsp;E. Holland,&nbsp;H. Kim,&nbsp;M. Mitchell,&nbsp;T. Naish,&nbsp;P. Nobre,&nbsp;B. L. Otto-Bliesner,&nbsp;K. A. Reed,&nbsp;J. Renwick,&nbsp;N. P. M. van der Wel","doi":"10.1029/2023EF004297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global climate change is often thought of as a steady and approximately predictable physical response to increasing forcings, which then requires commensurate adaptation. But adaptation has practical, cultural and biological limits, and climate change may pose unanticipated global hazards, sudden changes or other surprises–as may societal adaptation and mitigation responses. These poorly known factors could substantially affect the urgency of mitigation as well as adaptation decisions. We outline a strategy for better accommodating these challenges by making climate science more integrative, in order to identify and quantify known and novel physical risks including those arising from interactions with ecosystems and society. We need to do this even–or especially–when they are highly uncertain, and to explore risks and opportunities associated with mitigation and adaptation responses by engaging across disciplines. We argue that upcoming climate assessments need to be more risk-aware, and suggest ways of achieving this. These strategies improve the chances of anticipating potential surprises and identifying and communicating “safe landing” pathways that meet UN Sustainable Development Goals and guide humanity toward a better future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023EF004297","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertain Pathways to a Future Safe Climate\",\"authors\":\"S. C. Sherwood,&nbsp;G. Hegerl,&nbsp;P. Braconnot,&nbsp;P. Friedlingstein,&nbsp;H. Goelzer,&nbsp;N. R. P. Harris,&nbsp;E. Holland,&nbsp;H. Kim,&nbsp;M. Mitchell,&nbsp;T. Naish,&nbsp;P. Nobre,&nbsp;B. L. Otto-Bliesner,&nbsp;K. A. Reed,&nbsp;J. Renwick,&nbsp;N. P. M. van der Wel\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023EF004297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Global climate change is often thought of as a steady and approximately predictable physical response to increasing forcings, which then requires commensurate adaptation. But adaptation has practical, cultural and biological limits, and climate change may pose unanticipated global hazards, sudden changes or other surprises–as may societal adaptation and mitigation responses. These poorly known factors could substantially affect the urgency of mitigation as well as adaptation decisions. We outline a strategy for better accommodating these challenges by making climate science more integrative, in order to identify and quantify known and novel physical risks including those arising from interactions with ecosystems and society. We need to do this even–or especially–when they are highly uncertain, and to explore risks and opportunities associated with mitigation and adaptation responses by engaging across disciplines. We argue that upcoming climate assessments need to be more risk-aware, and suggest ways of achieving this. These strategies improve the chances of anticipating potential surprises and identifying and communicating “safe landing” pathways that meet UN Sustainable Development Goals and guide humanity toward a better future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023EF004297\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023EF004297\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023EF004297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们通常认为,全球气候变化是对不断增加的作用力做出的稳定且大致可预测的物理反应,因此需要相应的适应。但是,适应有其实际的、文化的和生物的局限性,气候变化可能会带来意想不到的全球性危害、突变或其他意外,社会的适应和减缓反应也可能如此。这些鲜为人知的因素可能会极大地影响减缓和适应决策的紧迫性。我们概述了通过提高气候科学的综合性来更好地应对这些挑战的战略,以便识别和量化已知的和新的物理风险,包括与生态系统和社会相互作用产生的风险。我们需要这样做,即使--或特别是--当它们高度不确定时,并通过跨学科参与来探索与减缓和适应对策相关的风险和机遇。我们认为,即将开展的气候评估需要提高风险意识,并提出了实现这一目标的方法。这些策略可以提高预测潜在意外的可能性,并确定和宣传 "安全着陆 "的途径,从而实现联合国可持续发展目标,引导人类走向更美好的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncertain Pathways to a Future Safe Climate

Uncertain Pathways to a Future Safe Climate

Global climate change is often thought of as a steady and approximately predictable physical response to increasing forcings, which then requires commensurate adaptation. But adaptation has practical, cultural and biological limits, and climate change may pose unanticipated global hazards, sudden changes or other surprises–as may societal adaptation and mitigation responses. These poorly known factors could substantially affect the urgency of mitigation as well as adaptation decisions. We outline a strategy for better accommodating these challenges by making climate science more integrative, in order to identify and quantify known and novel physical risks including those arising from interactions with ecosystems and society. We need to do this even–or especially–when they are highly uncertain, and to explore risks and opportunities associated with mitigation and adaptation responses by engaging across disciplines. We argue that upcoming climate assessments need to be more risk-aware, and suggest ways of achieving this. These strategies improve the chances of anticipating potential surprises and identifying and communicating “safe landing” pathways that meet UN Sustainable Development Goals and guide humanity toward a better future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信