全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身免疫反应指数(SIRI)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的关系

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Refaettin Sahin , Atakan Tanacan , Hakki Serbetci , Zahid Agaoglu , Murat Haksever , Ozgur Kara , Dilek Sahin
{"title":"全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身免疫反应指数(SIRI)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的关系","authors":"Refaettin Sahin ,&nbsp;Atakan Tanacan ,&nbsp;Hakki Serbetci ,&nbsp;Zahid Agaoglu ,&nbsp;Murat Haksever ,&nbsp;Ozgur Kara ,&nbsp;Dilek Sahin","doi":"10.1016/j.jri.2024.104275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the association of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Immune-Response Index (SIRI), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP)</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective case-control study was conducted in Ankara City Hospital perinatology clinic between 2022 and 2023. The diagnosis of CSP was made by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. NLR, SII, and SIRI values were compared between those diagnosed with CSP (n=23) and healthy pregnancies (n=126) at the time of first admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study group had significantly higher NLR, SII, and SIRI values compared to the controls. Optimal cut-off values were 3.79 (69 % sensitivity, 78.2 % specificity), 1180.6 (76.7 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity), and, 1.9 (83.3 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity) for NLR, SII, and SIRI, respectively. When NLR, SII and SIRI values were compared between CSP cases and pregnant women who had previous history of cesarean section but did not have CSP, significantly higher SII values were observed in the CSP group. The optimal cut-off value of SII was found to be 804.4 in predicting CSP among cases with previous history of cesarean delivery (73.9 % sensitivity, 66.2 % specificity).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SII, SIRI, and NLR may be useful in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy in pregnant women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive Immunology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Immune-Response Index (SIRI), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP)\",\"authors\":\"Refaettin Sahin ,&nbsp;Atakan Tanacan ,&nbsp;Hakki Serbetci ,&nbsp;Zahid Agaoglu ,&nbsp;Murat Haksever ,&nbsp;Ozgur Kara ,&nbsp;Dilek Sahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jri.2024.104275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the association of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Immune-Response Index (SIRI), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP)</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective case-control study was conducted in Ankara City Hospital perinatology clinic between 2022 and 2023. The diagnosis of CSP was made by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. NLR, SII, and SIRI values were compared between those diagnosed with CSP (n=23) and healthy pregnancies (n=126) at the time of first admission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study group had significantly higher NLR, SII, and SIRI values compared to the controls. Optimal cut-off values were 3.79 (69 % sensitivity, 78.2 % specificity), 1180.6 (76.7 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity), and, 1.9 (83.3 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity) for NLR, SII, and SIRI, respectively. When NLR, SII and SIRI values were compared between CSP cases and pregnant women who had previous history of cesarean section but did not have CSP, significantly higher SII values were observed in the CSP group. The optimal cut-off value of SII was found to be 804.4 in predicting CSP among cases with previous history of cesarean delivery (73.9 % sensitivity, 66.2 % specificity).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SII, SIRI, and NLR may be useful in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy in pregnant women.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproductive Immunology\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproductive Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037824000846\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037824000846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身免疫反应指数(SIRI)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的关系。 方法这项前瞻性病例对照研究于 2022 年至 2023 年在安卡拉市医院围产期门诊进行。通过经腹和经阴道超声诊断 CSP。结果与对照组相比,研究组的NLR、SII和SIRI值明显较高。NLR、SII 和 SIRI 的最佳临界值分别为 3.79(灵敏度为 69%,特异度为 78.2%)、1180.6(灵敏度为 76.7%,特异度为 72.7%)和 1.9(灵敏度为 83.3%,特异度为 72.7%)。当比较 CSP 病例与既往有剖宫产史但未患 CSP 的孕妇的 NLR、SII 和 SIRI 值时,发现 CSP 组的 SII 值明显较高。结论SII、SIRI 和 NLR 可能有助于预测孕妇的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Immune-Response Index (SIRI), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP)

Objective

To evaluate the association of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Immune-Response Index (SIRI), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP)

Methods

This prospective case-control study was conducted in Ankara City Hospital perinatology clinic between 2022 and 2023. The diagnosis of CSP was made by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. NLR, SII, and SIRI values were compared between those diagnosed with CSP (n=23) and healthy pregnancies (n=126) at the time of first admission.

Results

The study group had significantly higher NLR, SII, and SIRI values compared to the controls. Optimal cut-off values were 3.79 (69 % sensitivity, 78.2 % specificity), 1180.6 (76.7 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity), and, 1.9 (83.3 % sensitivity, 72.7 % specificity) for NLR, SII, and SIRI, respectively. When NLR, SII and SIRI values were compared between CSP cases and pregnant women who had previous history of cesarean section but did not have CSP, significantly higher SII values were observed in the CSP group. The optimal cut-off value of SII was found to be 804.4 in predicting CSP among cases with previous history of cesarean delivery (73.9 % sensitivity, 66.2 % specificity).

Conclusion

SII, SIRI, and NLR may be useful in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy in pregnant women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Affiliated with the European Society of Reproductive Immunology and with the International Society for Immunology of Reproduction The aim of the Journal of Reproductive Immunology is to provide the critical forum for the dissemination of results from high quality research in all aspects of experimental, animal and clinical reproductive immunobiology. This encompasses normal and pathological processes of: * Male and Female Reproductive Tracts * Gametogenesis and Embryogenesis * Implantation and Placental Development * Gestation and Parturition * Mammary Gland and Lactation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信