自然实验:评估 COVID-19 大流行对爱尔兰森林娱乐使用和偏好的影响

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Martin Murphy , Paula Cullen , Cathal O'Donoghue , Mary Ryan , Áine Ní Dhubháin
{"title":"自然实验:评估 COVID-19 大流行对爱尔兰森林娱乐使用和偏好的影响","authors":"Martin Murphy ,&nbsp;Paula Cullen ,&nbsp;Cathal O'Donoghue ,&nbsp;Mary Ryan ,&nbsp;Áine Ní Dhubháin","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study surveyed 292 visitors to eight recreational forests during the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate whether the pandemic had a stimulatory effect on visitation rates. An increase in visitation was noted, with existing visitors visiting more frequently. Many indicated that they planned to continue to visit more and the enjoyment they gained from the recreational experience was high. Few novel visitors were encountered. Using logistic regression, employed individuals and those working in the ‘Office/Education/Health’ sector were found to be significantly more likely to increase the frequency of their visits during the pandemic than those unemployed or working in other sectors; the opposite was true for older visitors. Using a panel regression model, it was found that increasing distance to a recreational forest was inversely related with level of preference; broadleaf forests and forests containing recreational facilities were positively correlated with level of preference. Visitors tended to have higher education levels than the population at large. They also did not generally travel far to reach a recreational forest and predominantly travelled by car. The results support the expansion of the forest estate near public transport and urban areas to maximise opportunities for forest recreation. They also highlight that more needs to be done to attract new visitors to forests and to expand the diversity of visitors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 103264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A natural experiment: Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon forest recreation use and preferences in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Martin Murphy ,&nbsp;Paula Cullen ,&nbsp;Cathal O'Donoghue ,&nbsp;Mary Ryan ,&nbsp;Áine Ní Dhubháin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study surveyed 292 visitors to eight recreational forests during the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate whether the pandemic had a stimulatory effect on visitation rates. An increase in visitation was noted, with existing visitors visiting more frequently. Many indicated that they planned to continue to visit more and the enjoyment they gained from the recreational experience was high. Few novel visitors were encountered. Using logistic regression, employed individuals and those working in the ‘Office/Education/Health’ sector were found to be significantly more likely to increase the frequency of their visits during the pandemic than those unemployed or working in other sectors; the opposite was true for older visitors. Using a panel regression model, it was found that increasing distance to a recreational forest was inversely related with level of preference; broadleaf forests and forests containing recreational facilities were positively correlated with level of preference. Visitors tended to have higher education levels than the population at large. They also did not generally travel far to reach a recreational forest and predominantly travelled by car. The results support the expansion of the forest estate near public transport and urban areas to maximise opportunities for forest recreation. They also highlight that more needs to be done to attract new visitors to forests and to expand the diversity of visitors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001187\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,本研究对八个休闲森林的 292 名游客进行了调查,以了解大流行是否对游客访问率产生了刺激作用。结果显示,游客人数有所增加,现有游客的访问频率也有所提高。许多人表示,他们计划继续增加游览次数,而且他们从娱乐体验中获得了很高的乐趣。新游客很少。利用逻辑回归法发现,与失业或在其他行业工作的人相比,就业人员和在 "办公室/教育/卫生 "行业工作的人在大流行期间增加游览次数的可能性要大得多;而老年游客的情况则恰恰相反。使用面板回归模型发现,与休闲森林距离的增加与偏好程度成反比;阔叶林和含有休闲设施的森林与偏好程度成正比。游客的教育水平往往高于一般人群。他们一般不会走很远的路去休闲森林,而且主要乘车前往。研究结果支持在公共交通和城市地区附近扩大森林面积,以最大限度地增加森林休闲的机会。他们还强调,需要做更多的工作来吸引新的游客进入森林,并扩大游客的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A natural experiment: Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon forest recreation use and preferences in Ireland

This study surveyed 292 visitors to eight recreational forests during the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate whether the pandemic had a stimulatory effect on visitation rates. An increase in visitation was noted, with existing visitors visiting more frequently. Many indicated that they planned to continue to visit more and the enjoyment they gained from the recreational experience was high. Few novel visitors were encountered. Using logistic regression, employed individuals and those working in the ‘Office/Education/Health’ sector were found to be significantly more likely to increase the frequency of their visits during the pandemic than those unemployed or working in other sectors; the opposite was true for older visitors. Using a panel regression model, it was found that increasing distance to a recreational forest was inversely related with level of preference; broadleaf forests and forests containing recreational facilities were positively correlated with level of preference. Visitors tended to have higher education levels than the population at large. They also did not generally travel far to reach a recreational forest and predominantly travelled by car. The results support the expansion of the forest estate near public transport and urban areas to maximise opportunities for forest recreation. They also highlight that more needs to be done to attract new visitors to forests and to expand the diversity of visitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信