[Contribution of qPCR to the diagnosis of cervico-vaginal infections at the Hôpital Principal de Dakar, Senegal].

Objective: To determine the etiology of cervico-vaginal infections by cytobacteriology and the efficacy of qPCR for the diagnosis of sensitive strains such as Streptococcus agalactiae, Borrelia crocidurae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema pallidum.

Methodology: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed between January and September 2021 in 346 women who were examined for cervico-vaginal infection at the Hôpital Principal de Dakar (HPD). Cytobacteriological (direct examination, agar culture) and molecular analyses were performed.

Results: Vaginal flora imbalances predominated, with a rate of 72.3%. The proportion of type IV vaginal flora was 46.5%. Of the 199 germs isolated, Candida albicans (25.1%), Ureaplasma urealyticum (17.6%), S. agalactiae (7.8%), Gardnerella vaginalis (6.6%) and nonalbicans Candida (5.5%) were the main pathogens responsible for cervico-vaginal infections in patients. Among women tested for mycoplasma, U. urealyticum was identified in 43.3% of patients. Among those tested for C. trachomatis, the proportion of infected women was low (4%). The prevalence of C. albicans was higher in pregnant women (38.3%) than in nonpregnant women (19.2%). S. agalactiae strains showed high resistance to certain beta-lactam antibiotics (pristinamycin 100%, gentamycin 100%, ampicillin 92.5% and cefalotin 85.2%) and to a glycopeptide antibiotic (vancomycin 100%). The Staphylococcus aureus strain had good sensitivity to antibiotics except gentamycin (100%) and kanamycin (100%). The enterobacteria tested were all sensitive to phenicols, carbapenems, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. However, E. coli showed high resistance to tetracycline. The different methods showed low prevalences of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, so comparisons Test RapidChlamydia/qPCR for C. trachomatis and culture/qPCR for N. gonorrhoeae were not possible. For S. agalactiae, on the other hand, qPCR was more advantageous than culture. The χ² test showed a significant difference (Yates χ² = 33.77 and p = 1^-7) for the diagnosis of S. agalactiae. S. agalactiae qPCR had a sensitivity of 40.7%, a specificity of 94%, and positive and negative predictive values of 36.7% and 94.9% respectively, as well as a kappa = 0.33.

Conclusion: The methods applied enabled us to identify the pathogens that cause cervicovaginal infections. The results suggest that qPCR may be an alternative, at least for the diagnosis of S. agalactiae. However, culture remains indispensable for studying antibiotic sensitivity. In order to improve patient care, molecular techniques need to be integrated into the HPD testing toolbox. To broaden the repertoire of pathogens to be diagnosed by qPCR, targeted comparison studies will be needed to increase the probability of encountering infected individuals.