{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者风险因素控制程度与全因死亡率之间的关系:前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess whether and to what extent excess risk of all-cause death is reduced in individuals with type 2 diabetes by achieving optimal control of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational, prospective, cohort study enrolled 15,773 Caucasian patients in 19 Italian centres in 2006–2008. Participants were stratified according to the number of the following risk factors outside target: haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub>, blood pressure, micro/macroalbuminuria, current smoking, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. All-cause mortality was retrieved for 15,656 patients (99.3 %) on 31 October 2015.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Age-adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios were significantly higher in the whole RIACE cohort (by ∼20 %) and in patients with (by ∼100 %) but not in those without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), as compared with the coeval Italian general population. In all patients and in those without prior CVD, the relationship with mortality according to the number of risk factors outside target was J-shaped, an effect that was attenuated after either excluding “overtreated “ patients, i.e., those with haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> ≤6.0 % on anti-hyperglycaemic agents causing hypoglycaemia and/or systolic blood pressure ≤120 mmHg on anti-hypertensive agents, or adjusting for “overtreatment”. Conversely, in patients with prior CVD, mortality remained higher than in the general population in all categories and increased progressively from +70 % to +314 %, without J-effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with type 2 diabetes, optimal treatment of traditional cardiovascular risk factors completely eliminated the excess mortality risk versus the general population, provided that they were not “overtreated”. However, this effect was observed only in participants without history of CVD.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00715481, retrospectively registered 15 July 2008.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50485,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between degree of risk factor control and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess whether and to what extent excess risk of all-cause death is reduced in individuals with type 2 diabetes by achieving optimal control of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational, prospective, cohort study enrolled 15,773 Caucasian patients in 19 Italian centres in 2006–2008. Participants were stratified according to the number of the following risk factors outside target: haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub>, blood pressure, micro/macroalbuminuria, current smoking, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. All-cause mortality was retrieved for 15,656 patients (99.3 %) on 31 October 2015.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Age-adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios were significantly higher in the whole RIACE cohort (by ∼20 %) and in patients with (by ∼100 %) but not in those without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), as compared with the coeval Italian general population. In all patients and in those without prior CVD, the relationship with mortality according to the number of risk factors outside target was J-shaped, an effect that was attenuated after either excluding “overtreated “ patients, i.e., those with haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> ≤6.0 % on anti-hyperglycaemic agents causing hypoglycaemia and/or systolic blood pressure ≤120 mmHg on anti-hypertensive agents, or adjusting for “overtreatment”. Conversely, in patients with prior CVD, mortality remained higher than in the general population in all categories and increased progressively from +70 % to +314 %, without J-effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with type 2 diabetes, optimal treatment of traditional cardiovascular risk factors completely eliminated the excess mortality risk versus the general population, provided that they were not “overtreated”. However, this effect was observed only in participants without history of CVD.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00715481, retrospectively registered 15 July 2008.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095362052400236X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095362052400236X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between degree of risk factor control and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study
Aims
To assess whether and to what extent excess risk of all-cause death is reduced in individuals with type 2 diabetes by achieving optimal control of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Methods
This observational, prospective, cohort study enrolled 15,773 Caucasian patients in 19 Italian centres in 2006–2008. Participants were stratified according to the number of the following risk factors outside target: haemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, micro/macroalbuminuria, current smoking, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. All-cause mortality was retrieved for 15,656 patients (99.3 %) on 31 October 2015.
Results
Age-adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios were significantly higher in the whole RIACE cohort (by ∼20 %) and in patients with (by ∼100 %) but not in those without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), as compared with the coeval Italian general population. In all patients and in those without prior CVD, the relationship with mortality according to the number of risk factors outside target was J-shaped, an effect that was attenuated after either excluding “overtreated “ patients, i.e., those with haemoglobin A1c ≤6.0 % on anti-hyperglycaemic agents causing hypoglycaemia and/or systolic blood pressure ≤120 mmHg on anti-hypertensive agents, or adjusting for “overtreatment”. Conversely, in patients with prior CVD, mortality remained higher than in the general population in all categories and increased progressively from +70 % to +314 %, without J-effect.
Conclusions
In patients with type 2 diabetes, optimal treatment of traditional cardiovascular risk factors completely eliminated the excess mortality risk versus the general population, provided that they were not “overtreated”. However, this effect was observed only in participants without history of CVD.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00715481, retrospectively registered 15 July 2008.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Internal Medicine serves as the official journal of the European Federation of Internal Medicine and is the primary scientific reference for European academic and non-academic internists. It is dedicated to advancing science and practice in internal medicine across Europe. The journal publishes original articles, editorials, reviews, internal medicine flashcards, and other relevant information in the field. Both translational medicine and clinical studies are emphasized. EJIM aspires to be a leading platform for excellent clinical studies, with a focus on enhancing the quality of healthcare in European hospitals.