Jade C Lam, Erwin H Lam, Sai Pidathala, Josna P Padiyar
{"title":"体外膜氧合支持(ARES)中的抗凝血酶限制:多学科方法。","authors":"Jade C Lam, Erwin H Lam, Sai Pidathala, Josna P Padiyar","doi":"10.1177/02676591241260179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation, guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.<i>Methods:</i> In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.<i>Results:</i> 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (<i>p</i> = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (<i>p</i> < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (<i>p</i> < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.<i>Conclusion:</i> Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"742-749"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antithrombin restriction in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ARES): A multidisciplinary approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jade C Lam, Erwin H Lam, Sai Pidathala, Josna P Padiyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02676591241260179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation, guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.<i>Methods:</i> In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.<i>Results:</i> 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (<i>p</i> = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (<i>p</i> < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (<i>p</i> < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.<i>Conclusion:</i> Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"742-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241260179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241260179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在体外膜氧合(ECMO)相关肝素抵抗的情况下,偶尔会使用抗凝血酶(AT)替代物。尽管过去的研究强调了补充 AT 的高成本和有限的临床益处,但仍缺乏防止不必要使用的策略指导:在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了成人 ECMO 患者实施 AT 限制方案前后三年的成本、疗效和安全性结果。主要终点是抗凝和 AT 费用与 ECMO 持续时间的关系。次要终点包括血栓栓塞和出血结果:175 名患者被纳入分析(限制前方案 n = 87;限制后方案 n = 88)。实施限制后,AT 的使用完全消失,主要成本终点从每 ECMO 天 1009.20 美元显著降至 42.99 美元(p < .001)。新的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率没有明显变化(p = .099)。实施前组的输血率(p < .001)和 ISTH 大出血率(p < .001)明显更高。在排除冠状病毒感染患者后,结果仍有意义:本研究结果说明了如何成功实施 AT 限制,以降低与抗凝相关的费用,同时又不影响 ECMO 患者的出血和血栓风险。
Antithrombin restriction in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ARES): A multidisciplinary approach.
Background: Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation, guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.Results: 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (p < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (p = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (p < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (p < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.Conclusion: Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.
期刊介绍:
Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.