卡塔尔 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素惰性:INERT-Q 研究。

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mohammed Bashir, Noora Al Thani, Abeer Khalid, Obada Khalil, Zaina Alamer, Mohammed Khair Hamad, Gowri Karuppasamy, Mohammed Abufaeid, Mutwakil Elbidairi, Dhabia Al-Mohnnadi, Tarik Elhadd, Mahmoud Zirie
{"title":"卡塔尔 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素惰性:INERT-Q 研究。","authors":"Mohammed Bashir,&nbsp;Noora Al Thani,&nbsp;Abeer Khalid,&nbsp;Obada Khalil,&nbsp;Zaina Alamer,&nbsp;Mohammed Khair Hamad,&nbsp;Gowri Karuppasamy,&nbsp;Mohammed Abufaeid,&nbsp;Mutwakil Elbidairi,&nbsp;Dhabia Al-Mohnnadi,&nbsp;Tarik Elhadd,&nbsp;Mahmoud Zirie","doi":"10.1002/edm2.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Achieving and maintaining adequate glycaemic control is critical to reduce diabetes-related complications. Therapeutic inertia is one of the leading causes of suboptimal glycaemic control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the degree of inertia in insulin initiation and intensification in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study and followed DM-2 2 years before and 2 years after the start of insulin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved glycaemic targets (HBA1c ≤ 7.5%) at 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 374 predominantly male subjects (62%). The mean age was 55.3 ± 11.3 years, the mean duration of DM-2 was 12.0 ± 7.3 years, 64.4% were obese, 47.6% had a microvascular disease, and 24.3% had a macrovascular disease. The mean HBA1c at −2nd year and −1st year was 9.2 ± 2.1% and 9.3 ± 2.0%, respectively. The mean HbA1C at the time of insulin initiation was 10.4 ± 2.1%. The mean HBA1c at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 8.5 ± 1.8%, 8.4 ± 1.8% and 8.5 ± 1.7%, respectively. The proportion of subjects who achieved HBA1c targets at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 32.9%, 31.0% and 32.9%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that achieving HBA1c targets at 6th month and 1st year increases the odds of achieving HBA1c targets at 2nd year (OR 4.87 [2.4–9.6] <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and (OR 6.2 [3.2–12.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In people with DM-2, there was an alarming delay in starting and titrating insulin. The reduction in HBA1c plateaued at 6th month. Earlier initiation and intensification of insulin therapy are critical to achieving glycaemic targets. More studies are needed to examine the causes of therapeutic inertia from physicians', patients' and systems' points of view.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin Inertia Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Qatar: The INERT-Q Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Bashir,&nbsp;Noora Al Thani,&nbsp;Abeer Khalid,&nbsp;Obada Khalil,&nbsp;Zaina Alamer,&nbsp;Mohammed Khair Hamad,&nbsp;Gowri Karuppasamy,&nbsp;Mohammed Abufaeid,&nbsp;Mutwakil Elbidairi,&nbsp;Dhabia Al-Mohnnadi,&nbsp;Tarik Elhadd,&nbsp;Mahmoud Zirie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edm2.495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Achieving and maintaining adequate glycaemic control is critical to reduce diabetes-related complications. Therapeutic inertia is one of the leading causes of suboptimal glycaemic control.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the degree of inertia in insulin initiation and intensification in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study and followed DM-2 2 years before and 2 years after the start of insulin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved glycaemic targets (HBA1c ≤ 7.5%) at 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 374 predominantly male subjects (62%). The mean age was 55.3 ± 11.3 years, the mean duration of DM-2 was 12.0 ± 7.3 years, 64.4% were obese, 47.6% had a microvascular disease, and 24.3% had a macrovascular disease. The mean HBA1c at −2nd year and −1st year was 9.2 ± 2.1% and 9.3 ± 2.0%, respectively. The mean HbA1C at the time of insulin initiation was 10.4 ± 2.1%. The mean HBA1c at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 8.5 ± 1.8%, 8.4 ± 1.8% and 8.5 ± 1.7%, respectively. The proportion of subjects who achieved HBA1c targets at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 32.9%, 31.0% and 32.9%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that achieving HBA1c targets at 6th month and 1st year increases the odds of achieving HBA1c targets at 2nd year (OR 4.87 [2.4–9.6] <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and (OR 6.2 [3.2–12.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In people with DM-2, there was an alarming delay in starting and titrating insulin. The reduction in HBA1c plateaued at 6th month. Earlier initiation and intensification of insulin therapy are critical to achieving glycaemic targets. More studies are needed to examine the causes of therapeutic inertia from physicians', patients' and systems' points of view.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实现并维持适当的血糖控制对减少糖尿病相关并发症至关重要。目的:评估 2 型糖尿病患者(DM-2)在开始和加强使用胰岛素时的惰性程度:我们进行了一项回顾性纵向队列研究,对开始使用胰岛素前 2 年和开始使用胰岛素后 2 年的 DM-2 患者进行了跟踪调查。主要结果是在第 6 个月、第 1 年和第 2 年达到血糖目标(HBA1c ≤ 7.5%)的患者比例:我们共纳入了 374 名男性患者(占 62%)。平均年龄为 55.3 ± 11.3 岁,DM-2 平均病程为 12.0 ± 7.3 年,64.4% 为肥胖,47.6% 有微血管疾病,24.3% 有大血管疾病。第 2 年和第 1 年的平均 HBA1c 分别为 9.2 ± 2.1% 和 9.3 ± 2.0%。开始使用胰岛素时的平均 HbA1C 为 10.4 ± 2.1%。第 6 个月、第 12 个月和第 2 年的平均 HBA1c 分别为 8.5 ± 1.8%、8.4 ± 1.8% 和 8.5 ± 1.7%。第 6 个月、第 12 个月和第 2 年达到 HBA1c 目标的受试者比例分别为 32.9%、31.0% 和 32.9%。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,第6个月和第1年达到HBA1c目标会增加第2年达到HBA1c目标的几率(OR 4.87 [2.4-9.6] p 结论):在DM-2患者中,胰岛素起始和滴定的延迟令人担忧。HBA1c 的降低在第 6 个月时趋于稳定。尽早开始和加强胰岛素治疗对实现血糖目标至关重要。需要进行更多的研究,从医生、患者和系统的角度研究治疗惰性的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insulin Inertia Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Qatar: The INERT-Q Study

Insulin Inertia Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Qatar: The INERT-Q Study

Background

Achieving and maintaining adequate glycaemic control is critical to reduce diabetes-related complications. Therapeutic inertia is one of the leading causes of suboptimal glycaemic control.

Aim

To assess the degree of inertia in insulin initiation and intensification in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2).

Methods

We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study and followed DM-2 2 years before and 2 years after the start of insulin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved glycaemic targets (HBA1c ≤ 7.5%) at 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year.

Results

We included 374 predominantly male subjects (62%). The mean age was 55.3 ± 11.3 years, the mean duration of DM-2 was 12.0 ± 7.3 years, 64.4% were obese, 47.6% had a microvascular disease, and 24.3% had a macrovascular disease. The mean HBA1c at −2nd year and −1st year was 9.2 ± 2.1% and 9.3 ± 2.0%, respectively. The mean HbA1C at the time of insulin initiation was 10.4 ± 2.1%. The mean HBA1c at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 8.5 ± 1.8%, 8.4 ± 1.8% and 8.5 ± 1.7%, respectively. The proportion of subjects who achieved HBA1c targets at 6th month, 12th month and 2nd year was 32.9%, 31.0% and 32.9%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that achieving HBA1c targets at 6th month and 1st year increases the odds of achieving HBA1c targets at 2nd year (OR 4.87 [2.4–9.6] p < 0.001) and (OR 6.2 [3.2–12.0], p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

In people with DM-2, there was an alarming delay in starting and titrating insulin. The reduction in HBA1c plateaued at 6th month. Earlier initiation and intensification of insulin therapy are critical to achieving glycaemic targets. More studies are needed to examine the causes of therapeutic inertia from physicians', patients' and systems' points of view.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信