肝硬化患者经膜使用 LAMS 相关不良事件的综合分析:国际多中心研究。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-06-06 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2312-1528
Faisal Nimri, Yervant Ichkhanian, Brianna Shinn, Thomas E Kowalski, David E Loren, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Alina Tantau, Martha Arevalo, Ashraf Taha, Omar Shamaa, Maria Chavarria Viales, Mouen A Khashab, Stephen Simmer, Sumit Singla, Cyrus Piraka, Tobias E Zuchelli
{"title":"肝硬化患者经膜使用 LAMS 相关不良事件的综合分析:国际多中心研究。","authors":"Faisal Nimri, Yervant Ichkhanian, Brianna Shinn, Thomas E Kowalski, David E Loren, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Alina Tantau, Martha Arevalo, Ashraf Taha, Omar Shamaa, Maria Chavarria Viales, Mouen A Khashab, Stephen Simmer, Sumit Singla, Cyrus Piraka, Tobias E Zuchelli","doi":"10.1055/a-2312-1528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural (TM) deployment of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is considered relatively safe in non-cirrhotic patients and is cautiously offered to cirrhotic patients. <b>Patients and methods</b> This was a retrospective, multicenter, international matched case-control study to study the safety of EUS-guided TM deployment of LAMS in cirrhotic patients. <b>Results</b> Forty-three cirrhotic patients with model for end-stage liver disease score 12.5 ± 5, with 23 having ascites and 16 with varices underwent EUS-guided TM LAMS deployment, including 19 for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage, 13 gallbladder drainage, six for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), three for EDGI, one for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP, and one postsurgical collection drainage. Technical failure occurred in one LAMS for PFC drainage. Clinical failure was encountered in another PFC. Nine adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most common AE was LAMS migration (3), followed by non-bleeding mucosal erosion (2), delayed bleeding (2), sepsis (1), and anesthesia-related complication (pulseless electrical activity) (1). Most AEs were graded as mild (6), followed by severe (2), and moderate (1); the majority were managed conservatively. On univariable comparison, risk of AE was higher when using a 20 × 10 mm LAMS and the absence of through-the-LAMS plastic stent(s). Conditional logistic regression of matched case-control patients did not show any association between potential predicting factors and occurrence of AEs. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study demonstrated that mainly in patients with Child-Pugh scores A and B cirrhosis and despite the presence of mild-to-moderate ascites in over half of cases, the majority of AEs were mild and could be managed conservatively. Further studies are warranted to verify the safety of LAMS in cirrhotic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 6","pages":"E740-E749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with transmural use of LAMS in patients with liver cirrhosis: International multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Faisal Nimri, Yervant Ichkhanian, Brianna Shinn, Thomas E Kowalski, David E Loren, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Alina Tantau, Martha Arevalo, Ashraf Taha, Omar Shamaa, Maria Chavarria Viales, Mouen A Khashab, Stephen Simmer, Sumit Singla, Cyrus Piraka, Tobias E Zuchelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2312-1528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural (TM) deployment of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is considered relatively safe in non-cirrhotic patients and is cautiously offered to cirrhotic patients. <b>Patients and methods</b> This was a retrospective, multicenter, international matched case-control study to study the safety of EUS-guided TM deployment of LAMS in cirrhotic patients. <b>Results</b> Forty-three cirrhotic patients with model for end-stage liver disease score 12.5 ± 5, with 23 having ascites and 16 with varices underwent EUS-guided TM LAMS deployment, including 19 for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage, 13 gallbladder drainage, six for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), three for EDGI, one for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP, and one postsurgical collection drainage. Technical failure occurred in one LAMS for PFC drainage. Clinical failure was encountered in another PFC. Nine adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most common AE was LAMS migration (3), followed by non-bleeding mucosal erosion (2), delayed bleeding (2), sepsis (1), and anesthesia-related complication (pulseless electrical activity) (1). Most AEs were graded as mild (6), followed by severe (2), and moderate (1); the majority were managed conservatively. On univariable comparison, risk of AE was higher when using a 20 × 10 mm LAMS and the absence of through-the-LAMS plastic stent(s). Conditional logistic regression of matched case-control patients did not show any association between potential predicting factors and occurrence of AEs. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study demonstrated that mainly in patients with Child-Pugh scores A and B cirrhosis and despite the presence of mild-to-moderate ascites in over half of cases, the majority of AEs were mild and could be managed conservatively. Further studies are warranted to verify the safety of LAMS in cirrhotic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"E740-E749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2312-1528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2312-1528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 在内镜超声(EUS)引导下经膜(TM)置入管腔贴壁金属支架(LAMS)被认为对非肝硬化患者相对安全,但对肝硬化患者则持谨慎态度。患者和方法 这是一项回顾性、多中心、国际匹配病例对照研究,目的是研究在 EUS 引导下对肝硬化患者进行 TM 置入 LAMS 的安全性。结果 43 名肝硬化患者的终末期肝病模型评分为 12.5 ± 5,其中 23 例有腹水,16 例有静脉曲张的肝硬化患者接受了 EUS 引导下的 TM LAMS 敷设,其中 19 例用于胰液收集 (PFC) 引流,13 例用于胆囊引流,6 例用于内镜超声引导下经胃内镜逆行胰胆管造影 (ERCP),3 例用于 EDGI,1 例用于内镜超声引导下经肠道 ERCP,1 例用于手术后收集引流。一次 LAMS PFC 引流术出现技术故障。另一台 PFC 出现临床失败。发生了 9 起不良事件(AE)。最常见的不良事件是 LAMS 移位(3 例),其次是不出血的粘膜糜烂(2 例)、延迟出血(2 例)、败血症(1 例)和麻醉相关并发症(无脉搏电活动)(1 例)。大多数并发症被评为轻度(6 例),其次是重度(2 例)和中度(1 例);大多数并发症都得到了保守治疗。经单变量比较,使用 20 × 10 毫米 LAMS 和不使用穿透 LAMS 塑料支架时,发生 AE 的风险较高。对匹配的病例对照患者进行条件逻辑回归后,并未发现潜在的预测因素与 AE 的发生有任何关联。结论 我们的研究表明,尽管半数以上病例存在轻度至中度腹水,但主要在 Child-Pugh 评分为 A 和 B 的肝硬化患者中,大多数 AEs 是轻度的,可以保守治疗。有必要开展进一步研究,以验证 LAMS 在肝硬化患者中的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with transmural use of LAMS in patients with liver cirrhosis: International multicenter study.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural (TM) deployment of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is considered relatively safe in non-cirrhotic patients and is cautiously offered to cirrhotic patients. Patients and methods This was a retrospective, multicenter, international matched case-control study to study the safety of EUS-guided TM deployment of LAMS in cirrhotic patients. Results Forty-three cirrhotic patients with model for end-stage liver disease score 12.5 ± 5, with 23 having ascites and 16 with varices underwent EUS-guided TM LAMS deployment, including 19 for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage, 13 gallbladder drainage, six for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), three for EDGI, one for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP, and one postsurgical collection drainage. Technical failure occurred in one LAMS for PFC drainage. Clinical failure was encountered in another PFC. Nine adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most common AE was LAMS migration (3), followed by non-bleeding mucosal erosion (2), delayed bleeding (2), sepsis (1), and anesthesia-related complication (pulseless electrical activity) (1). Most AEs were graded as mild (6), followed by severe (2), and moderate (1); the majority were managed conservatively. On univariable comparison, risk of AE was higher when using a 20 × 10 mm LAMS and the absence of through-the-LAMS plastic stent(s). Conditional logistic regression of matched case-control patients did not show any association between potential predicting factors and occurrence of AEs. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that mainly in patients with Child-Pugh scores A and B cirrhosis and despite the presence of mild-to-moderate ascites in over half of cases, the majority of AEs were mild and could be managed conservatively. Further studies are warranted to verify the safety of LAMS in cirrhotic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信