是否可以通过教育来激励人们使用正确的手部消毒技术?

Q4 Medicine
Helena Štrucelj, Jan Rošić Novak, Viktorija Bugarin, J. Brusić, Marija Spevan
{"title":"是否可以通过教育来激励人们使用正确的手部消毒技术?","authors":"Helena Štrucelj, Jan Rošić Novak, Viktorija Bugarin, J. Brusić, Marija Spevan","doi":"10.21860/medflum2024_316223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Hand hygiene is critical for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections, yet it is poorly practiced by healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of various incentives on the correctness of hand disinfection technique and motivation to use the technique correctly. Participants and Methods: The experiment was performed on three different days with 36 healthcare students. The procedure on the first and third day was the same and equal for all four groups (feedback alone). On the second day, the groups received different incentives (1: feedback + demonstration + creative teamwork; 2: feedback + demonstration + lecture; 3: feedback + demonstration; 4: feedback alone). Correctness (gel coverage percentage) and motivation were measured and compared between the three measurements. Results: Initially, only 25% of participants achieved at least 95% coverage, and only 55.56% tried at least \"quite a bit\" to use the technique correctly. Coverage increased after the incentive in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 6.000; P = 0.050), 2 (χ2(2) = 7.750; p = 0.021), and 3 (χ2(2) = 15.273; P = 0.001). Motivation increased in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 10.571; P = 0.005) and 3 (χ2(2) = 7.515; P = 0.023). Dorsum coverage was significantly smaller than palm coverage in both hands. Conclusion: Demonstration of hand disinfection technique, creative teamwork, and lecture were effective in adopting the habit of hand disinfection and reinforcing motivation to do so, but scanner feedback alone wasn't effective in this way. Future studies should examine longer follow-up period and testing these results in clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":39071,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Fluminensis","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Možemo li edukacijom utjecati na naviku i motivaciju za pravilnom tehnikom dezinfekcije ruku?\",\"authors\":\"Helena Štrucelj, Jan Rošić Novak, Viktorija Bugarin, J. Brusić, Marija Spevan\",\"doi\":\"10.21860/medflum2024_316223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Hand hygiene is critical for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections, yet it is poorly practiced by healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of various incentives on the correctness of hand disinfection technique and motivation to use the technique correctly. Participants and Methods: The experiment was performed on three different days with 36 healthcare students. The procedure on the first and third day was the same and equal for all four groups (feedback alone). On the second day, the groups received different incentives (1: feedback + demonstration + creative teamwork; 2: feedback + demonstration + lecture; 3: feedback + demonstration; 4: feedback alone). Correctness (gel coverage percentage) and motivation were measured and compared between the three measurements. Results: Initially, only 25% of participants achieved at least 95% coverage, and only 55.56% tried at least \\\"quite a bit\\\" to use the technique correctly. Coverage increased after the incentive in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 6.000; P = 0.050), 2 (χ2(2) = 7.750; p = 0.021), and 3 (χ2(2) = 15.273; P = 0.001). Motivation increased in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 10.571; P = 0.005) and 3 (χ2(2) = 7.515; P = 0.023). Dorsum coverage was significantly smaller than palm coverage in both hands. Conclusion: Demonstration of hand disinfection technique, creative teamwork, and lecture were effective in adopting the habit of hand disinfection and reinforcing motivation to do so, but scanner feedback alone wasn't effective in this way. Future studies should examine longer follow-up period and testing these results in clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Fluminensis\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Fluminensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2024_316223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Fluminensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2024_316223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手部卫生对于预防医护人员相关感染至关重要,但医护人员却很少进行手部卫生。本研究旨在探讨各种激励措施对正确使用手部消毒技术的影响以及正确使用手部消毒技术的动机。参与者和方法:实验在三个不同的日子进行,共有 36 名医护学生参加。第一天和第三天的程序相同,所有四组的程序也相同(仅反馈)。第二天,各组接受了不同的激励措施(1:反馈+演示+创造性团队合作;2:反馈+演示+讲座;3:反馈+演示;4:单独反馈)。对正确率(凝胶覆盖率)和积极性进行了测量,并对三次测量结果进行了比较。结果:最初,只有 25% 的参与者达到了至少 95% 的覆盖率,只有 55.56% 的参与者至少 "尝试了一些 "正确使用该技术。第一组(χ2(2) = 6.000; P = 0.050)、第二组(χ2(2) = 7.750; P = 0.021)和第三组(χ2(2) = 15.273; P = 0.001)的覆盖率在激励后有所提高。第 1 组 (χ2(2) = 10.571; P = 0.005) 和第 3 组 (χ2(2) = 7.515; P = 0.023) 的动机增加。两只手的手背覆盖率明显小于手掌覆盖率。结论手部消毒技术示范、创造性的团队合作和讲座对养成手部消毒的习惯和加强手部消毒的动机很有效,但仅靠扫描仪反馈在这方面并不有效。今后的研究应延长随访时间,并在临床环境中检验这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Možemo li edukacijom utjecati na naviku i motivaciju za pravilnom tehnikom dezinfekcije ruku?
Aim: Hand hygiene is critical for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections, yet it is poorly practiced by healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of various incentives on the correctness of hand disinfection technique and motivation to use the technique correctly. Participants and Methods: The experiment was performed on three different days with 36 healthcare students. The procedure on the first and third day was the same and equal for all four groups (feedback alone). On the second day, the groups received different incentives (1: feedback + demonstration + creative teamwork; 2: feedback + demonstration + lecture; 3: feedback + demonstration; 4: feedback alone). Correctness (gel coverage percentage) and motivation were measured and compared between the three measurements. Results: Initially, only 25% of participants achieved at least 95% coverage, and only 55.56% tried at least "quite a bit" to use the technique correctly. Coverage increased after the incentive in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 6.000; P = 0.050), 2 (χ2(2) = 7.750; p = 0.021), and 3 (χ2(2) = 15.273; P = 0.001). Motivation increased in groups 1 (χ2(2) = 10.571; P = 0.005) and 3 (χ2(2) = 7.515; P = 0.023). Dorsum coverage was significantly smaller than palm coverage in both hands. Conclusion: Demonstration of hand disinfection technique, creative teamwork, and lecture were effective in adopting the habit of hand disinfection and reinforcing motivation to do so, but scanner feedback alone wasn't effective in this way. Future studies should examine longer follow-up period and testing these results in clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Fluminensis
Medicina Fluminensis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信