2023 年丹戎卡朗地区法院法官对申请制作死亡证书的审议情况

Rian Prasetyo Wardhana, Baharudin Baharudin, Angga Alfiyan
{"title":"2023 年丹戎卡朗地区法院法官对申请制作死亡证书的审议情况","authors":"Rian Prasetyo Wardhana, Baharudin Baharudin, Angga Alfiyan","doi":"10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This writing discusses the importance of recording death certificates in society, focusing on the judge's considerations regarding the application for the creation of death certificates at the Tanjung Karang District Court in 2023. The human life cycle involves various significant events, including death, which requires documentation for legal certainty and administration. Despite existing regulations, there is still a lack of public interest in handling death certificates. Factors influencing people's reasons for obtaining death certificates involve legal obligations, inheritance administration, insurance claims, legal security, retirement, identity control, civil registry updates, religious rituals, asset management, and social assistance. This research employs a normative legal research method, referencing Law Number 16 of 2019 and Law Number 1 of 1974. The results indicate that the judge's considerations in approving or rejecting applications for death certificate issuance include sufficient evidence, public interest, procedural accuracy, data consistency, suspicion of information, disagreements among parties, the legal validity of applicants, the interests of children or heirs, and the risk of misuse. Understanding these factors is crucial in comprehending and raising public awareness about the importance of death certificate recording.","PeriodicalId":194212,"journal":{"name":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"20 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judge's Consideration of the Application for Making a Death Certificate at the Tanjung Karang District Court in 2023\",\"authors\":\"Rian Prasetyo Wardhana, Baharudin Baharudin, Angga Alfiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This writing discusses the importance of recording death certificates in society, focusing on the judge's considerations regarding the application for the creation of death certificates at the Tanjung Karang District Court in 2023. The human life cycle involves various significant events, including death, which requires documentation for legal certainty and administration. Despite existing regulations, there is still a lack of public interest in handling death certificates. Factors influencing people's reasons for obtaining death certificates involve legal obligations, inheritance administration, insurance claims, legal security, retirement, identity control, civil registry updates, religious rituals, asset management, and social assistance. This research employs a normative legal research method, referencing Law Number 16 of 2019 and Law Number 1 of 1974. The results indicate that the judge's considerations in approving or rejecting applications for death certificate issuance include sufficient evidence, public interest, procedural accuracy, data consistency, suspicion of information, disagreements among parties, the legal validity of applicants, the interests of children or heirs, and the risk of misuse. Understanding these factors is crucial in comprehending and raising public awareness about the importance of death certificate recording.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了记录死亡证明在社会中的重要性,重点是法官对 2023 年丹戎卡朗地区法院申请创建死亡证明的考虑。人的生命周期涉及各种重大事件,包括死亡,这就需要记录,以便在法律上确定和管理。尽管已有相关规定,但公众对办理死亡证书仍然缺乏兴趣。影响人们办理死亡证明原因的因素涉及法律义务、继承管理、保险索赔、法律保障、退休、身份控制、民事登记更新、宗教仪式、资产管理和社会援助。本研究采用了规范性法律研究方法,参考了 2019 年第 16 号法律和 1974 年第 1 号法律。研究结果表明,法官在批准或驳回死亡证明签发申请时的考虑因素包括证据充分性、公共利益、程序准确性、数据一致性、信息可疑性、当事人之间的分歧、申请人的法律效力、子女或继承人的利益以及滥用风险。了解这些因素对于理解和提高公众对死亡证明记录重要性的认识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judge's Consideration of the Application for Making a Death Certificate at the Tanjung Karang District Court in 2023
This writing discusses the importance of recording death certificates in society, focusing on the judge's considerations regarding the application for the creation of death certificates at the Tanjung Karang District Court in 2023. The human life cycle involves various significant events, including death, which requires documentation for legal certainty and administration. Despite existing regulations, there is still a lack of public interest in handling death certificates. Factors influencing people's reasons for obtaining death certificates involve legal obligations, inheritance administration, insurance claims, legal security, retirement, identity control, civil registry updates, religious rituals, asset management, and social assistance. This research employs a normative legal research method, referencing Law Number 16 of 2019 and Law Number 1 of 1974. The results indicate that the judge's considerations in approving or rejecting applications for death certificate issuance include sufficient evidence, public interest, procedural accuracy, data consistency, suspicion of information, disagreements among parties, the legal validity of applicants, the interests of children or heirs, and the risk of misuse. Understanding these factors is crucial in comprehending and raising public awareness about the importance of death certificate recording.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信