从普遍到多元:想象、构建和抹杀另类未来

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Maíra Sardão, Pedro Gabriel Silva
{"title":"从普遍到多元:想象、构建和抹杀另类未来","authors":"Maíra Sardão,&nbsp;Pedro Gabriel Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the face of abundant signs that we are on the brink of ecological collapse, exploring alternatives to production and consumption based on wasteful socio-economic relations is imperative. This article aims to identify and discuss alternative ways of acting in the present whilst envisioning different conceptions of futures beyond those engendered within capitalism. We look at the consolidation process of an idea of a singular universal way of existing and how it hinders different worldviews and conceptions of futures. The role of power structures and agencies is also observed, considering how different theoretical traditions deal with vulnerabilities and uncertainties while imagining and building alternative futures. The analysis draws on a conceptual model in which utopia, desire and hope emerge as symbolic resources that encourage social transformation. Based on the literature, experiences from different geographical locations illustrate the role of utopia, desire, and hope in building alternatives that move away from, when not resisting, hegemonic models of living. Despite the diversity of experiences, a common feature binds them: an inclination towards <em>commoning</em>. This stance is crucial to reimagine future horizons capable of challenging and deconstructing hegemonic worldviews.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 103412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the universal to the plural: Imagining, building up and obliterating alternative futures\",\"authors\":\"Maíra Sardão,&nbsp;Pedro Gabriel Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the face of abundant signs that we are on the brink of ecological collapse, exploring alternatives to production and consumption based on wasteful socio-economic relations is imperative. This article aims to identify and discuss alternative ways of acting in the present whilst envisioning different conceptions of futures beyond those engendered within capitalism. We look at the consolidation process of an idea of a singular universal way of existing and how it hinders different worldviews and conceptions of futures. The role of power structures and agencies is also observed, considering how different theoretical traditions deal with vulnerabilities and uncertainties while imagining and building alternative futures. The analysis draws on a conceptual model in which utopia, desire and hope emerge as symbolic resources that encourage social transformation. Based on the literature, experiences from different geographical locations illustrate the role of utopia, desire, and hope in building alternatives that move away from, when not resisting, hegemonic models of living. Despite the diversity of experiences, a common feature binds them: an inclination towards <em>commoning</em>. This stance is crucial to reimagine future horizons capable of challenging and deconstructing hegemonic worldviews.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724000958\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724000958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有大量迹象表明,我们正处于生态崩溃的边缘,面对这种情况,探索以浪费型社会经济关系为基础的生产和消费的替代方式势在必行。本文旨在确定和讨论当前的替代行动方式,同时设想资本主义之外的不同未来概念。我们探讨了单一的普遍存在方式这一理念的整合过程,以及它如何阻碍了不同的世界观和未来观。我们还观察了权力结构和机构的作用,考虑了不同的理论传统在想象和构建替代未来时如何处理脆弱性和不确定性。分析借鉴了一个概念模型,在这个模型中,乌托邦、愿望和希望作为鼓励社会变革的象征性资源而出现。根据文献,来自不同地理位置的经验说明了乌托邦、欲望和希望在建设替代方案中的作用,这些替代方案即使不抵制霸权生活模式,也会远离霸权生活模式。尽管经验多种多样,但有一个共同特点将它们联系在一起:倾向于共同化。这种立场对于重新构想能够挑战和解构霸权世界观的未来视野至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the universal to the plural: Imagining, building up and obliterating alternative futures

In the face of abundant signs that we are on the brink of ecological collapse, exploring alternatives to production and consumption based on wasteful socio-economic relations is imperative. This article aims to identify and discuss alternative ways of acting in the present whilst envisioning different conceptions of futures beyond those engendered within capitalism. We look at the consolidation process of an idea of a singular universal way of existing and how it hinders different worldviews and conceptions of futures. The role of power structures and agencies is also observed, considering how different theoretical traditions deal with vulnerabilities and uncertainties while imagining and building alternative futures. The analysis draws on a conceptual model in which utopia, desire and hope emerge as symbolic resources that encourage social transformation. Based on the literature, experiences from different geographical locations illustrate the role of utopia, desire, and hope in building alternatives that move away from, when not resisting, hegemonic models of living. Despite the diversity of experiences, a common feature binds them: an inclination towards commoning. This stance is crucial to reimagine future horizons capable of challenging and deconstructing hegemonic worldviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信