放牧牛群对北方生产林云杉幼树的影响

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Mélanie Spedener , Karen Marie Mathisen , Josh Hauer , Rémi Hérault , Gunnar Austrheim , Morten Tofastrud , Barbara Zimmermann
{"title":"放牧牛群对北方生产林云杉幼树的影响","authors":"Mélanie Spedener ,&nbsp;Karen Marie Mathisen ,&nbsp;Josh Hauer ,&nbsp;Rémi Hérault ,&nbsp;Gunnar Austrheim ,&nbsp;Morten Tofastrud ,&nbsp;Barbara Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The compatibility of forest livestock grazing with timber production is disputed, as livestock can damage young trees through browsing and trampling. At the same time, livestock grazing might reduce the growth of competing vegetation and thereby enhance conifer forest regeneration. We investigated the effects of cattle (<em>Bos taurus</em>) on young spruce (<em>Picea abies</em>) trees in boreal production forest. We compared data from young spruce plantations within and outside of the grazing area, and during and off the cattle grazing season. Overall, stocking rates were 0.01 cows per hectare across the grazing areas. Cattle did not distribute equally, but concentrated their area use to young spruce plantations, leading to locally high densities during periods of the grazing season. Cattle removed vegetation competing with young spruce trees: Within the grazing area, the sward height of the field layer vegetation was lower, and young willow (<em>Salix spec.</em>) and downy birch (<em>Betula pubescens</em>) trees were browsed more than outside the grazing area. The annual height growth of spruce increased once the spruce grew above sward height. Spruce trees surrounded by many competing trees grew slower than those surrounded by few trees. Bent spruce trees grew slower than undamaged spruce trees. Yet, no difference in annual spruce growth was found between inside and outside the cattle grazing area. In contrast, we found a higher spruce mortality risk inside than outside the cattle grazing area. This mortality risk was very low and positively correlated with a given spruce tree's bark being damaged. Cattle did not increase the risk of damaged stem bark. This study did not succeed in pointing out the mechanism by which cattle might increase spruce mortality risk. Interestingly, the probability of being browsed and the probability of being bent were higher after winter than after summer, indicating that wild ungulates and snow might have a stronger effect on young spruce trees than summer grazing cattle at these stocking rates. In conclusion, cattle had minor effects on young spruce trees. This study suggests that at low stocking rates, forestry and livestock production in boreal production systems are compatible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001031/pdfft?md5=4cf8dfaff1890474c097931d4cc641b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001031-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cattle grazing on young spruce trees in boreal production forest\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Spedener ,&nbsp;Karen Marie Mathisen ,&nbsp;Josh Hauer ,&nbsp;Rémi Hérault ,&nbsp;Gunnar Austrheim ,&nbsp;Morten Tofastrud ,&nbsp;Barbara Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The compatibility of forest livestock grazing with timber production is disputed, as livestock can damage young trees through browsing and trampling. At the same time, livestock grazing might reduce the growth of competing vegetation and thereby enhance conifer forest regeneration. We investigated the effects of cattle (<em>Bos taurus</em>) on young spruce (<em>Picea abies</em>) trees in boreal production forest. We compared data from young spruce plantations within and outside of the grazing area, and during and off the cattle grazing season. Overall, stocking rates were 0.01 cows per hectare across the grazing areas. Cattle did not distribute equally, but concentrated their area use to young spruce plantations, leading to locally high densities during periods of the grazing season. Cattle removed vegetation competing with young spruce trees: Within the grazing area, the sward height of the field layer vegetation was lower, and young willow (<em>Salix spec.</em>) and downy birch (<em>Betula pubescens</em>) trees were browsed more than outside the grazing area. The annual height growth of spruce increased once the spruce grew above sward height. Spruce trees surrounded by many competing trees grew slower than those surrounded by few trees. Bent spruce trees grew slower than undamaged spruce trees. Yet, no difference in annual spruce growth was found between inside and outside the cattle grazing area. In contrast, we found a higher spruce mortality risk inside than outside the cattle grazing area. This mortality risk was very low and positively correlated with a given spruce tree's bark being damaged. Cattle did not increase the risk of damaged stem bark. This study did not succeed in pointing out the mechanism by which cattle might increase spruce mortality risk. Interestingly, the probability of being browsed and the probability of being bent were higher after winter than after summer, indicating that wild ungulates and snow might have a stronger effect on young spruce trees than summer grazing cattle at these stocking rates. In conclusion, cattle had minor effects on young spruce trees. This study suggests that at low stocking rates, forestry and livestock production in boreal production systems are compatible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001031/pdfft?md5=4cf8dfaff1890474c097931d4cc641b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001031-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林牲畜放牧与木材生产的兼容性存在争议,因为牲畜会通过啃食和践踏损坏幼树。同时,放牧可能会减少竞争植被的生长,从而促进针叶林的再生。我们调查了牛(Bos taurus)对北方生产林中云杉幼树的影响。我们比较了放牧区内和放牧区外、放牧季节和非放牧季节云杉幼林的数据。总体而言,整个放牧区的放养率为每公顷 0.01 头牛。牛群的分布并不均衡,而是集中在云杉幼林区,导致放牧季节期间局部地区牛群密度较高。牛群清除了与云杉幼树竞争的植被:与放牧区外相比,放牧区内田间植被的草丛高度较低,柳树(Salix spec.云杉的年生长高度一旦超过草丛高度就会增加。被许多竞争树木包围的云杉比被少数树木包围的云杉生长缓慢。弯曲的云杉比未受损的云杉生长缓慢。然而,在放牧区内和放牧区外,云杉的年生长量并无差异。相反,我们发现放牧区内云杉的死亡风险高于放牧区外。这种死亡风险很低,而且与云杉树皮受损呈正相关。牛群并没有增加茎皮受损的风险。这项研究没有成功指出牛可能增加云杉死亡风险的机制。有趣的是,冬季过后,云杉被啃食的几率和被压弯的几率都高于夏季过后,这表明在这种放养率下,野生有蹄类动物和雪对云杉幼树的影响可能比夏季放牧的牛更大。总之,牛对云杉幼树的影响较小。这项研究表明,在低放养率下,北方生产系统中的林业和畜牧业生产是兼容的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of cattle grazing on young spruce trees in boreal production forest

Effects of cattle grazing on young spruce trees in boreal production forest

The compatibility of forest livestock grazing with timber production is disputed, as livestock can damage young trees through browsing and trampling. At the same time, livestock grazing might reduce the growth of competing vegetation and thereby enhance conifer forest regeneration. We investigated the effects of cattle (Bos taurus) on young spruce (Picea abies) trees in boreal production forest. We compared data from young spruce plantations within and outside of the grazing area, and during and off the cattle grazing season. Overall, stocking rates were 0.01 cows per hectare across the grazing areas. Cattle did not distribute equally, but concentrated their area use to young spruce plantations, leading to locally high densities during periods of the grazing season. Cattle removed vegetation competing with young spruce trees: Within the grazing area, the sward height of the field layer vegetation was lower, and young willow (Salix spec.) and downy birch (Betula pubescens) trees were browsed more than outside the grazing area. The annual height growth of spruce increased once the spruce grew above sward height. Spruce trees surrounded by many competing trees grew slower than those surrounded by few trees. Bent spruce trees grew slower than undamaged spruce trees. Yet, no difference in annual spruce growth was found between inside and outside the cattle grazing area. In contrast, we found a higher spruce mortality risk inside than outside the cattle grazing area. This mortality risk was very low and positively correlated with a given spruce tree's bark being damaged. Cattle did not increase the risk of damaged stem bark. This study did not succeed in pointing out the mechanism by which cattle might increase spruce mortality risk. Interestingly, the probability of being browsed and the probability of being bent were higher after winter than after summer, indicating that wild ungulates and snow might have a stronger effect on young spruce trees than summer grazing cattle at these stocking rates. In conclusion, cattle had minor effects on young spruce trees. This study suggests that at low stocking rates, forestry and livestock production in boreal production systems are compatible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信