根据实在法和伊斯兰法对非法伐木者进行刑事制裁(占碑地区法院案例研究)

Teguh Santiko Prasetyo
{"title":"根据实在法和伊斯兰法对非法伐木者进行刑事制裁(占碑地区法院案例研究)","authors":"Teguh Santiko Prasetyo","doi":"10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to find out how the Judge's legal considerations were for perpetrators of illegal logging in decision Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jbi and how the Islamic criminal law analysis of the Judge's considerations in deciding case Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN. Jbi. The data sources for this research were collected by studying documents, case files and library materials. The research results show that the legal basis used as a judge's consideration in imposing sanctions on perpetrators of illegal logging crimes is the demands of the Prosecutor/Public Prosecutor, namely the crime in Article 83 paragraph (1) letter b in conjunction with Article 12 letter e of RI Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year in prison reduced to the time the defendant is in temporary detention with an order that the defendant remain in detention and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah) subsidiary 3 (three) months in prison, and the judge decided on this crime with a sentence of 1 year in prison and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah). In Islamic criminal law, the criminal act of illegal logging (Illegal Logging) committed by the defendant is included in the category of jarimah ta'zir because there are no provisions in the text regarding this criminal act. Judges in this case are given the authority to impose sentences and can take various forms of punishment that can make the perpetrator of the crime worse, the aim is none other than to deter him from repeating his mistakes, such as caning, cutting off his hand, being imprisoned or detained, and others that adjusted according to the error rate.","PeriodicalId":194212,"journal":{"name":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminal Sanctions Against Perpetrators of Illegal Logging According to Positive Law and Islamic Law (Case Study of Cases at the Jambi District Court)\",\"authors\":\"Teguh Santiko Prasetyo\",\"doi\":\"10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted to find out how the Judge's legal considerations were for perpetrators of illegal logging in decision Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jbi and how the Islamic criminal law analysis of the Judge's considerations in deciding case Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN. Jbi. The data sources for this research were collected by studying documents, case files and library materials. The research results show that the legal basis used as a judge's consideration in imposing sanctions on perpetrators of illegal logging crimes is the demands of the Prosecutor/Public Prosecutor, namely the crime in Article 83 paragraph (1) letter b in conjunction with Article 12 letter e of RI Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year in prison reduced to the time the defendant is in temporary detention with an order that the defendant remain in detention and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah) subsidiary 3 (three) months in prison, and the judge decided on this crime with a sentence of 1 year in prison and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah). In Islamic criminal law, the criminal act of illegal logging (Illegal Logging) committed by the defendant is included in the category of jarimah ta'zir because there are no provisions in the text regarding this criminal act. Judges in this case are given the authority to impose sentences and can take various forms of punishment that can make the perpetrator of the crime worse, the aim is none other than to deter him from repeating his mistakes, such as caning, cutting off his hand, being imprisoned or detained, and others that adjusted according to the error rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解法官在第 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jbi 号判决中对非法伐木者的法律考虑,以及伊斯兰刑法对法官在第 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jbi 号案件判决中的考虑的分析。Jbi.本研究的数据来源是通过研究文件、案卷和图书馆资料收集的。研究结果表明,法官在对非法伐木犯罪者实施制裁时所考虑的法律依据是检察官/公诉人的要求,即《关于预防和根除非法伐木的 2013 年第 18 号地区执行法》第 83 条第 (1) 款第 b 项连同第 12 条第 e 项规定的犯罪。2013年第18号《防止和根除破坏森林罪法》第83条第1款第b项结合第12条第e项规定的罪行,判处1年有期徒刑,减刑为被告被临时拘留的时间,命令被告继续被拘留,并处以500 000 000印尼盾(5亿印尼盾)的罚金和3个月的有期徒刑,法官对这一罪行的判决是判处1年有期徒刑和500 000 000印尼盾(5亿印尼盾)的罚金。在伊斯兰刑法中,被告所犯的非法伐木(Illegal Logging)犯罪行为被归入 jarimah ta'zir 一类,因为法律条文中没有关于该犯罪行为的规定。在这种情况下,法官有权判刑,并可以采取各种形式的惩罚,使犯罪者变本加厉,其目的无非是阻止他重蹈覆辙,如鞭笞、砍手、监禁或拘留,以及根据错误率调整的其他惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criminal Sanctions Against Perpetrators of Illegal Logging According to Positive Law and Islamic Law (Case Study of Cases at the Jambi District Court)
This research was conducted to find out how the Judge's legal considerations were for perpetrators of illegal logging in decision Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jbi and how the Islamic criminal law analysis of the Judge's considerations in deciding case Number 601/Pid.Sus/2017/PN. Jbi. The data sources for this research were collected by studying documents, case files and library materials. The research results show that the legal basis used as a judge's consideration in imposing sanctions on perpetrators of illegal logging crimes is the demands of the Prosecutor/Public Prosecutor, namely the crime in Article 83 paragraph (1) letter b in conjunction with Article 12 letter e of RI Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year in prison reduced to the time the defendant is in temporary detention with an order that the defendant remain in detention and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah) subsidiary 3 (three) months in prison, and the judge decided on this crime with a sentence of 1 year in prison and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah). In Islamic criminal law, the criminal act of illegal logging (Illegal Logging) committed by the defendant is included in the category of jarimah ta'zir because there are no provisions in the text regarding this criminal act. Judges in this case are given the authority to impose sentences and can take various forms of punishment that can make the perpetrator of the crime worse, the aim is none other than to deter him from repeating his mistakes, such as caning, cutting off his hand, being imprisoned or detained, and others that adjusted according to the error rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信