比较空气预防和传统抛光对正畸患者牙菌斑评分的影响。随机对照试验

Jawad Ullah Shah, S. Shaheed, Muhammad Umer Khan, Salman Khan, Muhammad Behram Khan, Faisal Farid
{"title":"比较空气预防和传统抛光对正畸患者牙菌斑评分的影响。随机对照试验","authors":"Jawad Ullah Shah, S. Shaheed, Muhammad Umer Khan, Salman Khan, Muhammad Behram Khan, Faisal Farid","doi":"10.21608/eos.2023.251059.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the presence of orthodontic brackets, metallic bands, wire ligatures, and other appliances, there is an increased risk of plaque accumulation, which may result in periodontal damage and dental caries. One way of polishing teeth is through the prophylactic polishing paste method. The recent and more conservative approach is that of abrasive powder (e.g., sodium bicarbonate), which is used in prophy jet, which is less abrasive as compared to aluminum oxide particles. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to compare prophylactic paste and air prophy polishing methods on plaque scores in orthodontic patients who will undergo fixed orthodontic therapy. A total of 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Included patient required placement of fixed orthodontic appliances, plaque index should be equal to or greater than 15, patient’s age ranging from 12 -30 years. Excluded patients had missing permanent teeth except for 3rd molars, advanced periodontal diseases, systemic diseases, and allergic to any of the paste content. All the patients included in the study completed the study. Results showed no significant changes in post plaque score were found between the air prophy and rubber cup groups. A statistically significant change in pre and post-plaque score was found with both air prophy and rubber cup polishing methods. There was no significant difference in reducing plaque score between air prophy or rubber cup polishing methods. Both methods can be safely used to decrease the plaque score in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.","PeriodicalId":483969,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of air prophy and conventional polishing on plaque scores in orthodontic patients. A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jawad Ullah Shah, S. Shaheed, Muhammad Umer Khan, Salman Khan, Muhammad Behram Khan, Faisal Farid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/eos.2023.251059.1098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the presence of orthodontic brackets, metallic bands, wire ligatures, and other appliances, there is an increased risk of plaque accumulation, which may result in periodontal damage and dental caries. One way of polishing teeth is through the prophylactic polishing paste method. The recent and more conservative approach is that of abrasive powder (e.g., sodium bicarbonate), which is used in prophy jet, which is less abrasive as compared to aluminum oxide particles. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to compare prophylactic paste and air prophy polishing methods on plaque scores in orthodontic patients who will undergo fixed orthodontic therapy. A total of 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Included patient required placement of fixed orthodontic appliances, plaque index should be equal to or greater than 15, patient’s age ranging from 12 -30 years. Excluded patients had missing permanent teeth except for 3rd molars, advanced periodontal diseases, systemic diseases, and allergic to any of the paste content. All the patients included in the study completed the study. Results showed no significant changes in post plaque score were found between the air prophy and rubber cup groups. A statistically significant change in pre and post-plaque score was found with both air prophy and rubber cup polishing methods. There was no significant difference in reducing plaque score between air prophy or rubber cup polishing methods. Both methods can be safely used to decrease the plaque score in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2023.251059.1098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2023.251059.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果牙齿上有正畸托槽、金属带、金属丝结扎和其他装置,牙菌斑堆积的风险就会增加,从而可能导致牙周损伤和龋齿。抛光牙齿的一种方法是使用预防性抛光膏。最近比较保守的方法是使用研磨粉(如碳酸氢钠),这种研磨粉用于预防性喷射,与氧化铝颗粒相比,研磨性较低。这项随机临床试验的目的是比较预防性牙膏和空气预防性抛光方法对即将接受固定正畸治疗的正畸患者牙菌斑评分的影响。这项分口随机对照临床试验共纳入了 30 名符合纳入标准的患者。纳入的患者需要安装固定正畸装置,牙菌斑指数应等于或大于 15,患者年龄在 12-30 岁之间。除第三磨牙外,恒牙缺失、患有晚期牙周病、全身性疾病以及对任何牙膏成分过敏的患者均排除在外。所有参与研究的患者都完成了研究。结果表明,空气预防组和橡胶杯组的牙菌斑后评分没有明显变化。空气预防法和橡胶杯抛光法在牙菌斑前和牙菌斑后评分方面都有明显的统计学变化。空气预防法和橡胶杯抛光法在降低牙菌斑评分方面没有明显差异。这两种方法都可以安全地用于降低固定矫正器患者的牙菌斑评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of air prophy and conventional polishing on plaque scores in orthodontic patients. A randomized controlled trial
In the presence of orthodontic brackets, metallic bands, wire ligatures, and other appliances, there is an increased risk of plaque accumulation, which may result in periodontal damage and dental caries. One way of polishing teeth is through the prophylactic polishing paste method. The recent and more conservative approach is that of abrasive powder (e.g., sodium bicarbonate), which is used in prophy jet, which is less abrasive as compared to aluminum oxide particles. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to compare prophylactic paste and air prophy polishing methods on plaque scores in orthodontic patients who will undergo fixed orthodontic therapy. A total of 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Included patient required placement of fixed orthodontic appliances, plaque index should be equal to or greater than 15, patient’s age ranging from 12 -30 years. Excluded patients had missing permanent teeth except for 3rd molars, advanced periodontal diseases, systemic diseases, and allergic to any of the paste content. All the patients included in the study completed the study. Results showed no significant changes in post plaque score were found between the air prophy and rubber cup groups. A statistically significant change in pre and post-plaque score was found with both air prophy and rubber cup polishing methods. There was no significant difference in reducing plaque score between air prophy or rubber cup polishing methods. Both methods can be safely used to decrease the plaque score in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信