{"title":"信念外包与论证能否改变思想的相关性","authors":"Scott Hill","doi":"10.1093/arisoc/aoae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is a wealth of evidence which indicates that arguments are not very efficient tools for changing minds. Against this scepticism, Dutilh Novaes (2023) presents evidence that, given the right social context, arguments sometimes play a significant role in belief revision. However, drawing on Levy (2021), I argue that the evidence Dutilh Novaes cites is compatible with the view that it is not arguments that change individual minds but instead belief outsourcing that occurs alongside the consideration of arguments.","PeriodicalId":386537,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relevance of Belief Outsourcing to Whether Arguments Can Change Minds\",\"authors\":\"Scott Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arisoc/aoae010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There is a wealth of evidence which indicates that arguments are not very efficient tools for changing minds. Against this scepticism, Dutilh Novaes (2023) presents evidence that, given the right social context, arguments sometimes play a significant role in belief revision. However, drawing on Levy (2021), I argue that the evidence Dutilh Novaes cites is compatible with the view that it is not arguments that change individual minds but instead belief outsourcing that occurs alongside the consideration of arguments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoae010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoae010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大量证据表明,论证并不是改变思想的有效工具。针对这种怀疑,Dutilh Novaes(2023 年)提出的证据表明,在适当的社会背景下,论证有时会在信念修正中发挥重要作用。然而,借鉴 Levy (2021),我认为 Dutilh Novaes 引用的证据与以下观点是一致的,即改变个人思想的不是论证,而是与论证同时发生的信念外包。
The Relevance of Belief Outsourcing to Whether Arguments Can Change Minds
There is a wealth of evidence which indicates that arguments are not very efficient tools for changing minds. Against this scepticism, Dutilh Novaes (2023) presents evidence that, given the right social context, arguments sometimes play a significant role in belief revision. However, drawing on Levy (2021), I argue that the evidence Dutilh Novaes cites is compatible with the view that it is not arguments that change individual minds but instead belief outsourcing that occurs alongside the consideration of arguments.