论推行第三方法院案件质量与效果评估的必要性

Lei Chen
{"title":"论推行第三方法院案件质量与效果评估的必要性","authors":"Lei Chen","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v5n2p148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has theoretical rationality different from the court 's internal self-quality and effectiveness evaluation in the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation, and has unique subject value attributes; however, the current internal self-evaluation system of the court has limitations in terms of evaluation elements such as subject, content, method, purpose and effectiveness, and cannot fully realize the functional requirements of the quality and effectiveness evaluation of court cases. The implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation is not only in line with the value of judicial operation, but also has the value of the rule of law practice different from the self-quality and effectiveness evaluation within the court. Therefore, the implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has the necessity of theory and practice, and is an important part of the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation.","PeriodicalId":508472,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Science Research","volume":"58 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Necessity of Implementing the Quality and Effectiveness Evaluation of Third-party Court Cases\",\"authors\":\"Lei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/sssr.v5n2p148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has theoretical rationality different from the court 's internal self-quality and effectiveness evaluation in the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation, and has unique subject value attributes; however, the current internal self-evaluation system of the court has limitations in terms of evaluation elements such as subject, content, method, purpose and effectiveness, and cannot fully realize the functional requirements of the quality and effectiveness evaluation of court cases. The implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation is not only in line with the value of judicial operation, but also has the value of the rule of law practice different from the self-quality and effectiveness evaluation within the court. Therefore, the implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has the necessity of theory and practice, and is an important part of the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Social Science Research\",\"volume\":\"58 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Social Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v5n2p148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v5n2p148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法院案件质量与效果评价中,第三方法院案件质量与效果评价具有不同于法院内部自我质量与效果评价的理论合理性,具有独特的主体价值属性;但目前法院内部自我评价体系在评价主体、内容、方法、目的、效果等评价要素方面存在局限性,不能完全实现法院案件质量与效果评价的功能要求。实行第三方法院案件质量和效果评查,既符合司法运行的价值取向,又具有不同于法院内部自我质量和效果评查的法治实践价值。因此,实施第三方法院案件质量与效果评查具有理论与实践的必然性,是法院案件质量与效果评查的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Necessity of Implementing the Quality and Effectiveness Evaluation of Third-party Court Cases
The third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has theoretical rationality different from the court 's internal self-quality and effectiveness evaluation in the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation, and has unique subject value attributes; however, the current internal self-evaluation system of the court has limitations in terms of evaluation elements such as subject, content, method, purpose and effectiveness, and cannot fully realize the functional requirements of the quality and effectiveness evaluation of court cases. The implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation is not only in line with the value of judicial operation, but also has the value of the rule of law practice different from the self-quality and effectiveness evaluation within the court. Therefore, the implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has the necessity of theory and practice, and is an important part of the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信