{"title":"硬皮病的缩写","authors":"Georgios Kravvas, Christopher Bunker","doi":"10.1002/ski2.401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The short communication highlights a debate over the use of acronyms in medical literature, particularly focusing on “LSc” versus “LS” for lichen sclerosus. Despite the contested nature of the issue, we argue for the adoption of “LSc” due to its clarity and to avoid confusion with other medical terms. To best reflect the evolving nature of medical terminology and the authors' expertise, we also advocate for the authors' rights in choosing acronyms within their work.","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The acronymisation of lichen sclerosus\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Kravvas, Christopher Bunker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ski2.401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The short communication highlights a debate over the use of acronyms in medical literature, particularly focusing on “LSc” versus “LS” for lichen sclerosus. Despite the contested nature of the issue, we argue for the adoption of “LSc” due to its clarity and to avoid confusion with other medical terms. To best reflect the evolving nature of medical terminology and the authors' expertise, we also advocate for the authors' rights in choosing acronyms within their work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The short communication highlights a debate over the use of acronyms in medical literature, particularly focusing on “LSc” versus “LS” for lichen sclerosus. Despite the contested nature of the issue, we argue for the adoption of “LSc” due to its clarity and to avoid confusion with other medical terms. To best reflect the evolving nature of medical terminology and the authors' expertise, we also advocate for the authors' rights in choosing acronyms within their work.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
