双光谱指数对术中意识的影响:随机对照研究的荟萃分析

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Thomas Cheriyan, Kevin Bai, Shreya Bayyapureddy, A. Dua, Paramvir Singh, Zhuo Sun, Chhaya Patel, Vikas Kumar
{"title":"双光谱指数对术中意识的影响:随机对照研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Thomas Cheriyan, Kevin Bai, Shreya Bayyapureddy, A. Dua, Paramvir Singh, Zhuo Sun, Chhaya Patel, Vikas Kumar","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_74_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of bispectral index (BIS) to reduce intra-operative awareness (IOA) have reported conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to consolidate results from RCTs to assess the efficacy of BIS in reducing IOA when compared to controls. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, time to spontaneous and/or verbal eye opening, PACU discharge time, and utilization of inhaled anesthetics.\n \n \n \n RCTs which reported on one of the primary and/or secondary outcomes were included. Literature search utilized keywords “randomized control trial” and “intraoperative awareness.” Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.\n \n \n \n Twenty-seven RCTs were included in the study with a total of 35,585 patients, with 18,146 patients in the BIS and 17,439 in the control group. Eighteen of 14,062 patients (0.12%) and 42 of 16,765 (0.25%) reported definite IOA in the BIS and control group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. BIS was effective in reducing the time to spontaneous eye opening by an average of 1.3 minutes and the time to extubation by an average of 1.97 minutes. There was no difference in PACU discharge times among the groups. There was a significant decrease in consumption of sevoflurane but no difference in desflurane and propofol compared to the control group.\n \n \n \n While BIS monitoring results in decreased incidence of intra-operative awareness by half, it was not statistically significant. BIS provides modest benefits with regard to reducing the time to extubation, the time to spontaneous eye opening, and consumption of sevoflurane.\n Level of evidence: I.\n","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Cheriyan, Kevin Bai, Shreya Bayyapureddy, A. Dua, Paramvir Singh, Zhuo Sun, Chhaya Patel, Vikas Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_74_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of bispectral index (BIS) to reduce intra-operative awareness (IOA) have reported conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to consolidate results from RCTs to assess the efficacy of BIS in reducing IOA when compared to controls. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, time to spontaneous and/or verbal eye opening, PACU discharge time, and utilization of inhaled anesthetics.\\n \\n \\n \\n RCTs which reported on one of the primary and/or secondary outcomes were included. Literature search utilized keywords “randomized control trial” and “intraoperative awareness.” Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.\\n \\n \\n \\n Twenty-seven RCTs were included in the study with a total of 35,585 patients, with 18,146 patients in the BIS and 17,439 in the control group. Eighteen of 14,062 patients (0.12%) and 42 of 16,765 (0.25%) reported definite IOA in the BIS and control group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. BIS was effective in reducing the time to spontaneous eye opening by an average of 1.3 minutes and the time to extubation by an average of 1.97 minutes. There was no difference in PACU discharge times among the groups. There was a significant decrease in consumption of sevoflurane but no difference in desflurane and propofol compared to the control group.\\n \\n \\n \\n While BIS monitoring results in decreased incidence of intra-operative awareness by half, it was not statistically significant. BIS provides modest benefits with regard to reducing the time to extubation, the time to spontaneous eye opening, and consumption of sevoflurane.\\n Level of evidence: I.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_74_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_74_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究双光谱指数(BIS)降低术中知觉(IOA)效果的随机对照试验(RCT)报告了相互矛盾的结果。本荟萃分析的目的是整合 RCT 的结果,评估 BIS 与对照组相比在降低 IOA 方面的疗效。次要结果包括拔管时间、自发和/或口头睁眼时间、PACU 出院时间以及吸入麻醉剂的使用情况。 纳入了报告主要和/或次要结果之一的 RCT。文献检索使用的关键词为 "随机对照试验 "和 "术中意识"。使用 RevMan 5 进行了 Meta 分析。 研究共纳入了 27 项随机对照试验,共计 35,585 名患者,其中 18,146 名患者为 BIS 组,17,439 名患者为对照组。BIS 组和对照组分别有 14,062 名患者和 16,765 名患者中的 18 人(0.12%)和 42 人(0.25%)报告了明确的 IOA,差异无统计学意义。BIS 可有效缩短自发睁眼时间,平均缩短 1.3 分钟,缩短拔管时间,平均缩短 1.97 分钟。各组的 PACU 出院时间没有差异。与对照组相比,七氟醚的用量明显减少,但地氟醚和异丙酚的用量没有差异。 虽然 BIS 监测使术中意识丧失的发生率降低了一半,但在统计学上并不显著。BIS 在缩短拔管时间、自发睁眼时间和七氟醚消耗量方面的益处不大。证据等级:I.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of bispectral index (BIS) to reduce intra-operative awareness (IOA) have reported conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to consolidate results from RCTs to assess the efficacy of BIS in reducing IOA when compared to controls. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, time to spontaneous and/or verbal eye opening, PACU discharge time, and utilization of inhaled anesthetics. RCTs which reported on one of the primary and/or secondary outcomes were included. Literature search utilized keywords “randomized control trial” and “intraoperative awareness.” Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. Twenty-seven RCTs were included in the study with a total of 35,585 patients, with 18,146 patients in the BIS and 17,439 in the control group. Eighteen of 14,062 patients (0.12%) and 42 of 16,765 (0.25%) reported definite IOA in the BIS and control group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. BIS was effective in reducing the time to spontaneous eye opening by an average of 1.3 minutes and the time to extubation by an average of 1.97 minutes. There was no difference in PACU discharge times among the groups. There was a significant decrease in consumption of sevoflurane but no difference in desflurane and propofol compared to the control group. While BIS monitoring results in decreased incidence of intra-operative awareness by half, it was not statistically significant. BIS provides modest benefits with regard to reducing the time to extubation, the time to spontaneous eye opening, and consumption of sevoflurane. Level of evidence: I.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信