与性别确认护理相关的令人担忧的健康误导趋势。

IF 2.3 3区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1002/hast.1590

Stef M. Shuster, Meredithe McNamara

{"title":"与性别确认护理相关的令人担忧的健康误导趋势。","authors":"Stef M. Shuster, Meredithe McNamara","doi":"10.1002/hast.1590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>Amidst the misinformation climate about trans people and their health care that dominates policy and social discourse, autonomy-based rationales for gender-affirming care for trans and nonbinary youth are being called into question. In this commentary, which responds to “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” by Moti Gorin, we contextualize the virulent ideas circulating in misinformation campaigns that have become weaponized for unprecedented legal interference into standard health care. We conclude that the current legal justifications for upending gender-affirming care gloss over how this health care field meets conventional evidentiary standards and aligns protocols with most other fields of medicine. Refusal to offer gender-affirming care is more harmful than centralizing trans and nonbinary people's health autonomy</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"53-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care\",\"authors\":\"Stef M. Shuster, Meredithe McNamara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.1590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>Amidst the misinformation climate about trans people and their health care that dominates policy and social discourse, autonomy-based rationales for gender-affirming care for trans and nonbinary youth are being called into question. In this commentary, which responds to “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” by Moti Gorin, we contextualize the virulent ideas circulating in misinformation campaigns that have become weaponized for unprecedented legal interference into standard health care. We conclude that the current legal justifications for upending gender-affirming care gloss over how this health care field meets conventional evidentiary standards and aligns protocols with most other fields of medicine. Refusal to offer gender-affirming care is more harmful than centralizing trans and nonbinary people's health autonomy</i>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"53-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1590\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在主导政策和社会言论的有关变性人及其医疗保健的错误信息氛围中，为变性和非二元青年提供基于自主性的性别确认护理的理由受到质疑。本评论是对莫蒂-戈林（Moti Gorin）所写的《儿科 "性别确认 "护理的目的是什么？我们的结论是，目前为破坏性别确认护理而提出的法律理由掩盖了这一医疗保健领域如何符合传统的证据标准，以及如何与大多数其他医学领域的协议保持一致。拒绝提供性别确认护理比集中变性人和非二元人的健康自主权更为有害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care

Amidst the misinformation climate about trans people and their health care that dominates policy and social discourse, autonomy-based rationales for gender-affirming care for trans and nonbinary youth are being called into question. In this commentary, which responds to “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” by Moti Gorin, we contextualize the virulent ideas circulating in misinformation campaigns that have become weaponized for unprecedented legal interference into standard health care. We conclude that the current legal justifications for upending gender-affirming care gloss over how this health care field meets conventional evidentiary standards and aligns protocols with most other fields of medicine. Refusal to offer gender-affirming care is more harmful than centralizing trans and nonbinary people's health autonomy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

3.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.