打破二元对立：儿科性别平等护理中对女权主义生命伦理学的迫切需求》（Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care）。

IF 2.3 3区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1002/hast.1591

Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson R. Jackson, Jacob D. Moses

{"title":"打破二元对立：儿科性别平等护理中对女权主义生命伦理学的迫切需求》（Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care）。","authors":"Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson R. Jackson, Jacob D. Moses","doi":"10.1002/hast.1591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities.","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"55-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson R. Jackson, Jacob D. Moses\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.1591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"55-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论回应了莫蒂-戈林（Moti Gorin）的文章 "儿科'性别确认'护理的目的是什么？我们认为，戈林反对儿科性别确认护理的理由建立在许多错误的概念二元对立之上：女性/男性、公共/私人、客观/主观、医学上必要/选择。借鉴女权主义生命伦理学，我们展示了这种二分法思维是如何既不准确又边缘化性别少数群体的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care

This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

3.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.