死亡的未出生婴儿、死后隐私案件和堕胎权利。

IF 2.3 3区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1002/hast.1586

Anita L. Allen

{"title":"死亡的未出生婴儿、死后隐私案件和堕胎权利。","authors":"Anita L. Allen","doi":"10.1002/hast.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>The privacy of the dead is an interesting area of concern for bioethicists. There is a legal doctrine that the dead can't have privacy rights, but also a body of contrary law ascribing privacy rights to the deceased and kin in relation to the deceased. As women's abortion privacy is under assault by American courts and legislatures, the implications of ascribing privacy rights to embryos and fetuses is more important than ever. Caution is called for in this domain</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dead Unborn, Postmortem Privacy Cases, and Abortion Rights\",\"authors\":\"Anita L. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.1586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>The privacy of the dead is an interesting area of concern for bioethicists. There is a legal doctrine that the dead can't have privacy rights, but also a body of contrary law ascribing privacy rights to the deceased and kin in relation to the deceased. As women's abortion privacy is under assault by American courts and legislatures, the implications of ascribing privacy rights to embryos and fetuses is more important than ever. Caution is called for in this domain</i>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1586\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

死者的隐私权是生命伦理学者关注的一个有趣领域。有一种法律学说认为死者不能享有隐私权，但也有一套相反的法律规定死者和与死者有关的亲属享有隐私权。由于妇女堕胎的隐私权受到美国法院和立法机构的攻击，赋予胚胎和胎儿隐私权的影响比以往任何时候都更加重要。在这一领域需要谨慎行事。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Dead Unborn, Postmortem Privacy Cases, and Abortion Rights

The privacy of the dead is an interesting area of concern for bioethicists. There is a legal doctrine that the dead can't have privacy rights, but also a body of contrary law ascribing privacy rights to the deceased and kin in relation to the deceased. As women's abortion privacy is under assault by American courts and legislatures, the implications of ascribing privacy rights to embryos and fetuses is more important than ever. Caution is called for in this domain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

3.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.