养育子女、虐待儿童和社会不利条件:以人口为基础的 "三P "循证育儿支持系统的实施与评估》(A Population-Based Implementation and Evaluation of the Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support)。

IF 4.5 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Child Maltreatment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1177/10775595241259994
Matthew R Sanders, Denise Clague, Tomasz Zając, Janeen Baxter, Mark Western, Carys Chainey, Alina Morawska, Wojtek Tomaszewski, Ronald J Prinz, Kylie Burke
{"title":"养育子女、虐待儿童和社会不利条件:以人口为基础的 \"三P \"循证育儿支持系统的实施与评估》(A Population-Based Implementation and Evaluation of the Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support)。","authors":"Matthew R Sanders, Denise Clague, Tomasz Zając, Janeen Baxter, Mark Western, Carys Chainey, Alina Morawska, Wojtek Tomaszewski, Ronald J Prinz, Kylie Burke","doi":"10.1177/10775595241259994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child Maltreatment (CM) is a widespread public health problem, with adverse outcomes for children, families, and communities. Evidence-based parenting support delivered via a public health approach may be an effective means to prevent CM. The Every Family 2 population trial applied a public health approach to delivering evidence-based parenting support to prevent CM in disadvantaged communities. Using a quasi-experimental design, 64 matched low socioeconomic communities in the Australian states of Queensland and New South Wales received either the full multi-level Triple P system (TPS) of parenting support, or Care as Usual (CAU). Two population indicators of CM, the number of substantiated cases of CM, and the number of notifications of CM to protective services were compared using Welch's <i>t</i>-test to evaluate intervention effectiveness. After two years of intervention, medium to large effect sizes favoring TPS communities were found for substantiations (d = 0.57, <i>p</i> < .05) and notifications (d = 1.86, <i>p</i> < .001). These findings show the value of the TPS, deployed using a public health approach, in efforts to prevent CM in socially disadvantaged communities. A number of uncontrolled contextual factors are described that may have contributed to some of the differences detected between TPS and CAU communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"177-191"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parenting, Child Maltreatment, and Social Disadvantage: A Population-Based Implementation and Evaluation of the Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R Sanders, Denise Clague, Tomasz Zając, Janeen Baxter, Mark Western, Carys Chainey, Alina Morawska, Wojtek Tomaszewski, Ronald J Prinz, Kylie Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775595241259994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Child Maltreatment (CM) is a widespread public health problem, with adverse outcomes for children, families, and communities. Evidence-based parenting support delivered via a public health approach may be an effective means to prevent CM. The Every Family 2 population trial applied a public health approach to delivering evidence-based parenting support to prevent CM in disadvantaged communities. Using a quasi-experimental design, 64 matched low socioeconomic communities in the Australian states of Queensland and New South Wales received either the full multi-level Triple P system (TPS) of parenting support, or Care as Usual (CAU). Two population indicators of CM, the number of substantiated cases of CM, and the number of notifications of CM to protective services were compared using Welch's <i>t</i>-test to evaluate intervention effectiveness. After two years of intervention, medium to large effect sizes favoring TPS communities were found for substantiations (d = 0.57, <i>p</i> < .05) and notifications (d = 1.86, <i>p</i> < .001). These findings show the value of the TPS, deployed using a public health approach, in efforts to prevent CM in socially disadvantaged communities. A number of uncontrolled contextual factors are described that may have contributed to some of the differences detected between TPS and CAU communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Maltreatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"177-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Maltreatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241259994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241259994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虐待儿童(CM)是一个普遍存在的公共卫生问题,对儿童、家庭和社区都有不利影响。通过公共卫生方法提供循证育儿支持可能是预防儿童虐待的有效手段。每个家庭 2 人口 "试验采用公共卫生方法,在弱势社区提供循证亲职支持,以预防儿童虐待。通过准实验设计,澳大利亚昆士兰州和新南威尔士州的 64 个匹配的低社会经济社区接受了完整的多层次三P系统(TPS)育儿支持或常规护理(CAU)。我们使用韦尔奇 t 检验法比较了儿童疾病的两个人口指标,即儿童疾病确诊病例数和儿童疾病保护服务通知数,以评估干预效果。经过两年的干预后,发现在证实(d = 0.57,p < .05)和通知(d = 1.86,p < .001)方面,中到大的效应大小有利于 TPS 社区。这些研究结果表明,在社会处境不利的社区,采用公共卫生方法部署的 TPS 在预防中风方面具有重要价值。本文描述了一些未受控制的背景因素,这些因素可能是造成在 TPS 社区和 CAU 社区之间发现的某些差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parenting, Child Maltreatment, and Social Disadvantage: A Population-Based Implementation and Evaluation of the Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support.

Child Maltreatment (CM) is a widespread public health problem, with adverse outcomes for children, families, and communities. Evidence-based parenting support delivered via a public health approach may be an effective means to prevent CM. The Every Family 2 population trial applied a public health approach to delivering evidence-based parenting support to prevent CM in disadvantaged communities. Using a quasi-experimental design, 64 matched low socioeconomic communities in the Australian states of Queensland and New South Wales received either the full multi-level Triple P system (TPS) of parenting support, or Care as Usual (CAU). Two population indicators of CM, the number of substantiated cases of CM, and the number of notifications of CM to protective services were compared using Welch's t-test to evaluate intervention effectiveness. After two years of intervention, medium to large effect sizes favoring TPS communities were found for substantiations (d = 0.57, p < .05) and notifications (d = 1.86, p < .001). These findings show the value of the TPS, deployed using a public health approach, in efforts to prevent CM in socially disadvantaged communities. A number of uncontrolled contextual factors are described that may have contributed to some of the differences detected between TPS and CAU communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信