有效治疗大面积深度烧伤的新手术理念。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Gabriel Hundeshagen, Adriana C Panayi, Torsten Hannmann, Leonard Knoedler, Christian Tapking, Alen Palackic, Valentin Haug, Björn Bliesener, Julian Vogelpohl, Felix H Vollbach, Ulrich Kneser
{"title":"有效治疗大面积深度烧伤的新手术理念。","authors":"Gabriel Hundeshagen, Adriana C Panayi, Torsten Hannmann, Leonard Knoedler, Christian Tapking, Alen Palackic, Valentin Haug, Björn Bliesener, Julian Vogelpohl, Felix H Vollbach, Ulrich Kneser","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective burn surgery is based on two fundamental principles: prompt excision of necrotic tissue and definitive coverage, preserving functional dermis and body contour. There is often compromise, either prioritizing the urgency of excision or opting for patient stability and optimal conditions prior to autografting. We propose a surgical concept that addresses this critical treatment gap. In 2022, we implemented a new three-phase protocol, EDM: (Excision phase, E) Immediate excision of the burn wound preserving body contour; (Dermis phase, D) definitive temporization of the wound bed, using biodegradable temporizing matrix, to prepare it for successful grafting. Upon complete dermal temporization, full autologous coverage in a single micrografting procedure is achieved (Meek phase, M). We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to characterize the EDM protocol compared to the prior standard of care (>40% TBSA, n = 5 in EDM vs n = 10 matched controls). Primary outcomes were total surgeries required, total surgeries to achieve>90% healing, uninterrupted recovery time without surgery, and time on mechanical ventilation. The EDM group required fewer surgeries in total (5 vs 9.5; P = .01) and to achieve>90% healing (3 vs 6.5; P = .001). EDM patients experienced longer uninterrupted recovery (25 vs 13 days, P = .001). Additionally, EDM patients spent less time on mechanical ventilation (210 vs 1136 h, P = .005). The EDM protocol could improve surgical efficiency, ultimately having the potential to expedite rehabilitation for severely burned patients. The study underscores the potential of combining the fundamentals of burn surgery, with innovative surgical techniques and materials, in order to bridge the gap between excision and grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"218-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Surgical Concept for the Efficient Treatment of Large and Deep Burns.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Hundeshagen, Adriana C Panayi, Torsten Hannmann, Leonard Knoedler, Christian Tapking, Alen Palackic, Valentin Haug, Björn Bliesener, Julian Vogelpohl, Felix H Vollbach, Ulrich Kneser\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective burn surgery is based on two fundamental principles: prompt excision of necrotic tissue and definitive coverage, preserving functional dermis and body contour. There is often compromise, either prioritizing the urgency of excision or opting for patient stability and optimal conditions prior to autografting. We propose a surgical concept that addresses this critical treatment gap. In 2022, we implemented a new three-phase protocol, EDM: (Excision phase, E) Immediate excision of the burn wound preserving body contour; (Dermis phase, D) definitive temporization of the wound bed, using biodegradable temporizing matrix, to prepare it for successful grafting. Upon complete dermal temporization, full autologous coverage in a single micrografting procedure is achieved (Meek phase, M). We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to characterize the EDM protocol compared to the prior standard of care (>40% TBSA, n = 5 in EDM vs n = 10 matched controls). Primary outcomes were total surgeries required, total surgeries to achieve>90% healing, uninterrupted recovery time without surgery, and time on mechanical ventilation. The EDM group required fewer surgeries in total (5 vs 9.5; P = .01) and to achieve>90% healing (3 vs 6.5; P = .001). EDM patients experienced longer uninterrupted recovery (25 vs 13 days, P = .001). Additionally, EDM patients spent less time on mechanical ventilation (210 vs 1136 h, P = .005). The EDM protocol could improve surgical efficiency, ultimately having the potential to expedite rehabilitation for severely burned patients. The study underscores the potential of combining the fundamentals of burn surgery, with innovative surgical techniques and materials, in order to bridge the gap between excision and grafting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的烧伤手术基于两个基本原则:及时切除坏死组织和保留功能性真皮层和身体轮廓的明确覆盖。在进行自体移植之前,要么优先考虑切除的紧迫性,要么选择患者的稳定性和最佳条件,这两者之间往往存在折衷。我们提出了一种手术理念,以弥补这一关键的治疗缺陷。2022 年,我们实施了一项新的三阶段方案,即 EDM:(切除阶段,E)立即切除烧伤创面,保留身体轮廓;(真皮阶段,D)使用生物可降解增殖基质(BTM)对创面进行明确的临时处理,为成功移植做好准备。(Meek阶段,M):在完成真皮临时处理后,通过单次微移植手术实现全自体覆盖。我们进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,将 EDM 方案与之前的标准治疗方案(>40%TBSA,EDM 中的 5 例与匹配的对照组 10 例)进行比较。主要结果是所需手术总数、达到>90%愈合的手术总数、不手术的不间断恢复时间和机械通气时间。EDM 组所需的手术总数(5 对 9.5;P=0.01)和达到 90% 以上愈合的手术次数(3 对 6.5;P=0.001)均少于对照组。EDM患者经历了更长的不间断恢复期(24天对14天,P=0.001)。此外,EDM 患者的机械通气时间更短(210 小时对 1136 小时,P=0.005)。EDM方案可以提高手术效率,最终有可能加快严重烧伤患者的康复。这项研究强调了将烧伤外科的基本原理与创新的外科技术和材料相结合的潜力,以便在切除和移植之间架起一座桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Surgical Concept for the Efficient Treatment of Large and Deep Burns.

Effective burn surgery is based on two fundamental principles: prompt excision of necrotic tissue and definitive coverage, preserving functional dermis and body contour. There is often compromise, either prioritizing the urgency of excision or opting for patient stability and optimal conditions prior to autografting. We propose a surgical concept that addresses this critical treatment gap. In 2022, we implemented a new three-phase protocol, EDM: (Excision phase, E) Immediate excision of the burn wound preserving body contour; (Dermis phase, D) definitive temporization of the wound bed, using biodegradable temporizing matrix, to prepare it for successful grafting. Upon complete dermal temporization, full autologous coverage in a single micrografting procedure is achieved (Meek phase, M). We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to characterize the EDM protocol compared to the prior standard of care (>40% TBSA, n = 5 in EDM vs n = 10 matched controls). Primary outcomes were total surgeries required, total surgeries to achieve>90% healing, uninterrupted recovery time without surgery, and time on mechanical ventilation. The EDM group required fewer surgeries in total (5 vs 9.5; P = .01) and to achieve>90% healing (3 vs 6.5; P = .001). EDM patients experienced longer uninterrupted recovery (25 vs 13 days, P = .001). Additionally, EDM patients spent less time on mechanical ventilation (210 vs 1136 h, P = .005). The EDM protocol could improve surgical efficiency, ultimately having the potential to expedite rehabilitation for severely burned patients. The study underscores the potential of combining the fundamentals of burn surgery, with innovative surgical techniques and materials, in order to bridge the gap between excision and grafting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信