同样的疗法,同样的钙动员?利用患者特异性预测模型探索钙在体内各区间的交换。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Carlo Balsamello, Mar Martinez Mas, Giuseppe Rombolà, Riccardo Floreani, Maria Laura Costantino, Giustina Casagrande
{"title":"同样的疗法,同样的钙动员?利用患者特异性预测模型探索钙在体内各区间的交换。","authors":"Carlo Balsamello,&nbsp;Mar Martinez Mas,&nbsp;Giuseppe Rombolà,&nbsp;Riccardo Floreani,&nbsp;Maria Laura Costantino,&nbsp;Giustina Casagrande","doi":"10.1111/aor.14800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Comprehensive, patient-specific models are essential to study calcium deposition and mobilization during dialysis. We aim to develop tools to support clinical prescriptions with a more accurate approach for the prediction of calcium mobilization while also considering major electrolytes and catabolites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We modified a multi-solute model predicting patient-specific dialysis response by incorporating a calcium buffer to represent bone exchanges. Data from four centers, involving 127 patients with six sessions each, were utilized. For each patient, three sessions were allocated for model training (ID<sub>123</sub>), while the remaining sessions were for validation (PRED456). The normalized root mean square error (nRMSE%) was used to evaluate both descriptive and predictive accuracy. Correlations between initial data and calcium exchanges were also assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall nRMSE% for ID<sub>123</sub> was 3.92%. For PRED<sub>456</sub>, it was 3.46% (ranging from a minimum of 1.17% for [Na<sup>+</sup>] to a maximum of 6.62% for [urea]). The median nRMSE% for plasma calcium varied between 1.13 and 8.32 for SHD sessions, depending on whether Ca_dialysis fluid (Ca<sub>d</sub>) was ≥ or &lt;1.50 mmol/L, respectively. For HDF sessions, the range was between 2.90 and 5.89. A significant and moderate correlation was found between overall calcium removal and the buffer balance. The most robust correlation observed was between the amount of calcium administered via post-dilution fluid and the overall calcium removal in the dialysis filter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Identical therapy settings do not uniformly affect calcium mobilization, and our approach offers insight into calcium distribution across body compartments. This understanding will enhance clinical prescription practices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient-specific predictive model\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Balsamello,&nbsp;Mar Martinez Mas,&nbsp;Giuseppe Rombolà,&nbsp;Riccardo Floreani,&nbsp;Maria Laura Costantino,&nbsp;Giustina Casagrande\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Comprehensive, patient-specific models are essential to study calcium deposition and mobilization during dialysis. We aim to develop tools to support clinical prescriptions with a more accurate approach for the prediction of calcium mobilization while also considering major electrolytes and catabolites.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We modified a multi-solute model predicting patient-specific dialysis response by incorporating a calcium buffer to represent bone exchanges. Data from four centers, involving 127 patients with six sessions each, were utilized. For each patient, three sessions were allocated for model training (ID<sub>123</sub>), while the remaining sessions were for validation (PRED456). The normalized root mean square error (nRMSE%) was used to evaluate both descriptive and predictive accuracy. Correlations between initial data and calcium exchanges were also assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall nRMSE% for ID<sub>123</sub> was 3.92%. For PRED<sub>456</sub>, it was 3.46% (ranging from a minimum of 1.17% for [Na<sup>+</sup>] to a maximum of 6.62% for [urea]). The median nRMSE% for plasma calcium varied between 1.13 and 8.32 for SHD sessions, depending on whether Ca_dialysis fluid (Ca<sub>d</sub>) was ≥ or &lt;1.50 mmol/L, respectively. For HDF sessions, the range was between 2.90 and 5.89. A significant and moderate correlation was found between overall calcium removal and the buffer balance. The most robust correlation observed was between the amount of calcium administered via post-dilution fluid and the overall calcium removal in the dialysis filter.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identical therapy settings do not uniformly affect calcium mobilization, and our approach offers insight into calcium distribution across body compartments. This understanding will enhance clinical prescription practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aor.14800\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aor.14800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究透析过程中的钙沉积和钙动员,必须建立针对患者的综合模型。我们的目标是开发一种工具,用更准确的方法预测钙动员,同时考虑主要电解质和代谢产物,以支持临床处方:方法:我们修改了预测特定患者透析反应的多溶质模型,加入了钙缓冲剂以代表骨交换。我们利用了来自四个中心的数据,每个中心有 127 名患者接受了六次透析。每名患者有三个疗程用于模型训练(ID123),其余疗程用于验证(PRED456)。归一化均方根误差(nRMSE%)用于评估描述和预测准确性。此外,还评估了初始数据与钙交换之间的相关性:ID123的总体均方根误差(nRMSE%)为3.92%。PRED456 的 nRMSE% 为 3.46%([Na+]最小为 1.17%,[尿素]最大为 6.62%)。在 SHD 疗程中,血浆钙的 nRMSE% 中值介于 1.13 和 8.32 之间,具体取决于钙透析液 (Cad) 是≥ 还是结论:相同的治疗设置对钙动员的影响并不一致,我们的方法有助于深入了解钙在身体各部分的分布情况。这种认识将改进临床处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient-specific predictive model

Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient-specific predictive model

Background

Comprehensive, patient-specific models are essential to study calcium deposition and mobilization during dialysis. We aim to develop tools to support clinical prescriptions with a more accurate approach for the prediction of calcium mobilization while also considering major electrolytes and catabolites.

Methods

We modified a multi-solute model predicting patient-specific dialysis response by incorporating a calcium buffer to represent bone exchanges. Data from four centers, involving 127 patients with six sessions each, were utilized. For each patient, three sessions were allocated for model training (ID123), while the remaining sessions were for validation (PRED456). The normalized root mean square error (nRMSE%) was used to evaluate both descriptive and predictive accuracy. Correlations between initial data and calcium exchanges were also assessed.

Results

The overall nRMSE% for ID123 was 3.92%. For PRED456, it was 3.46% (ranging from a minimum of 1.17% for [Na+] to a maximum of 6.62% for [urea]). The median nRMSE% for plasma calcium varied between 1.13 and 8.32 for SHD sessions, depending on whether Ca_dialysis fluid (Cad) was ≥ or <1.50 mmol/L, respectively. For HDF sessions, the range was between 2.90 and 5.89. A significant and moderate correlation was found between overall calcium removal and the buffer balance. The most robust correlation observed was between the amount of calcium administered via post-dilution fluid and the overall calcium removal in the dialysis filter.

Conclusions

Identical therapy settings do not uniformly affect calcium mobilization, and our approach offers insight into calcium distribution across body compartments. This understanding will enhance clinical prescription practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信