评估甲状腺自身免疫妇女的卵巢储备功能。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Adriana Leal Griz Notaro, Filipe Tenório Lira Neto, Giuliano Marchetti Bedoschi, Maria Jéssica da Silva, Mariana Corrêa Nunes, Catharina Cavalcanti Pessoa Monteiro, José Natal Figueiroa, Alex Sandro Rolland Souza
{"title":"评估甲状腺自身免疫妇女的卵巢储备功能。","authors":"Adriana Leal Griz Notaro, Filipe Tenório Lira Neto, Giuliano Marchetti Bedoschi, Maria Jéssica da Silva, Mariana Corrêa Nunes, Catharina Cavalcanti Pessoa Monteiro, José Natal Figueiroa, Alex Sandro Rolland Souza","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age with and without thyroid autoimmunity (TAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from an assisted reproduction clinic from February 2017 to December 2021. Women aged between18 and 47 years with data on antithyroperoxidase and antithyroglobulin (anti-Tg) antibodies and assessment of ovarian reserve by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were included. Among the 188 participants included, 63 were diagnosed with TAI, and 125 had both antibodies negative. AMH and AFC were compared between groups. Subanalysis based on age, types of antibodies, and thyroid function markers were performed. In addition, bivariate analysis and regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was no difference in the median levels of AMH or AFC between the two groups. However, in the subgroup analysis by age, we observed a trend towards lower median levels of AMH in women over 39 years with TAI (0.9 ng/mL vs. 1.5 ng/mL, p=0.08). In a subanalysis according to antibodies, we found a significantly lower median AFC in the group with anti-Tg than in the group without this antibody (8.0 follicles vs. 11.5 follicles, p=0.036). We also found a significantly higher prevalence of anti-Tg in patients with low ovarian reserve compared to those with normal reserve (60.7% vs. 39.3%, p=0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ovarian reserve of women with TAI appears to be insidiously compromised over the years, with a decreased ovarian reserve in women with anti-Tg.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ovarian reserve in women with thyroid autoimmunity.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Leal Griz Notaro, Filipe Tenório Lira Neto, Giuliano Marchetti Bedoschi, Maria Jéssica da Silva, Mariana Corrêa Nunes, Catharina Cavalcanti Pessoa Monteiro, José Natal Figueiroa, Alex Sandro Rolland Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20240032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age with and without thyroid autoimmunity (TAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from an assisted reproduction clinic from February 2017 to December 2021. Women aged between18 and 47 years with data on antithyroperoxidase and antithyroglobulin (anti-Tg) antibodies and assessment of ovarian reserve by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were included. Among the 188 participants included, 63 were diagnosed with TAI, and 125 had both antibodies negative. AMH and AFC were compared between groups. Subanalysis based on age, types of antibodies, and thyroid function markers were performed. In addition, bivariate analysis and regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was no difference in the median levels of AMH or AFC between the two groups. However, in the subgroup analysis by age, we observed a trend towards lower median levels of AMH in women over 39 years with TAI (0.9 ng/mL vs. 1.5 ng/mL, p=0.08). In a subanalysis according to antibodies, we found a significantly lower median AFC in the group with anti-Tg than in the group without this antibody (8.0 follicles vs. 11.5 follicles, p=0.036). We also found a significantly higher prevalence of anti-Tg in patients with low ovarian reserve compared to those with normal reserve (60.7% vs. 39.3%, p=0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ovarian reserve of women with TAI appears to be insidiously compromised over the years, with a decreased ovarian reserve in women with anti-Tg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较患有和未患有甲状腺自身免疫(TAI)的育龄妇女的卵巢储备功能:比较患有和不患有甲状腺自身免疫(TAI)的育龄妇女的卵巢储备情况:我们对一家辅助生殖诊所 2017 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月的医疗记录进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了年龄在18至47岁之间、具有抗过氧化物酶和抗甲状腺球蛋白(anti-Tg)抗体数据以及通过抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)和前卵泡计数(AFC)评估卵巢储备功能的女性。在188名参与者中,63人被确诊为TAI,125人两种抗体均为阴性。对各组的 AMH 和 AFC 进行了比较。根据年龄、抗体类型和甲状腺功能指标进行了子分析。此外,还使用了双变量分析和回归模型:结果:总体而言,两组患者的 AMH 或 AFC 中位水平没有差异。然而,在按年龄进行的亚组分析中,我们观察到39岁以上患有TAI的妇女的AMH中位数水平有降低的趋势(0.9纳克/毫升对1.5纳克/毫升,P=0.08)。在根据抗体进行的子分析中,我们发现抗Tg组的AFC中位数明显低于无抗Tg组(8.0个卵泡对11.5个卵泡,P=0.036)。我们还发现,与卵巢储备功能正常的患者相比,卵巢储备功能低下的患者抗Tg的发生率明显更高(60.7%对39.3%,P=0.038):结论:TAI妇女的卵巢储备功能似乎会随着时间的推移而逐渐减弱,抗Tg妇女的卵巢储备功能会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of ovarian reserve in women with thyroid autoimmunity.

Objective: To compare the ovarian reserve of women of reproductive age with and without thyroid autoimmunity (TAI).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from an assisted reproduction clinic from February 2017 to December 2021. Women aged between18 and 47 years with data on antithyroperoxidase and antithyroglobulin (anti-Tg) antibodies and assessment of ovarian reserve by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were included. Among the 188 participants included, 63 were diagnosed with TAI, and 125 had both antibodies negative. AMH and AFC were compared between groups. Subanalysis based on age, types of antibodies, and thyroid function markers were performed. In addition, bivariate analysis and regression models were used.

Results: Overall, there was no difference in the median levels of AMH or AFC between the two groups. However, in the subgroup analysis by age, we observed a trend towards lower median levels of AMH in women over 39 years with TAI (0.9 ng/mL vs. 1.5 ng/mL, p=0.08). In a subanalysis according to antibodies, we found a significantly lower median AFC in the group with anti-Tg than in the group without this antibody (8.0 follicles vs. 11.5 follicles, p=0.036). We also found a significantly higher prevalence of anti-Tg in patients with low ovarian reserve compared to those with normal reserve (60.7% vs. 39.3%, p=0.038).

Conclusions: The ovarian reserve of women with TAI appears to be insidiously compromised over the years, with a decreased ovarian reserve in women with anti-Tg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信