Koen Jacobs, Alena Moerman, Karl Vandepoele, Tim Van den Abeele, Katrien De Mulder, Eva Steel, Maxim Clauwaert, Henk Louagie
{"title":"慢性髓性白血病中BCR::ABL1的变异特异性定量差异。","authors":"Koen Jacobs, Alena Moerman, Karl Vandepoele, Tim Van den Abeele, Katrien De Mulder, Eva Steel, Maxim Clauwaert, Henk Louagie","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of the <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by <i>BCR::ABL1</i> can vary in size, depending on the <i>BCR</i> and/or <i>ABL1</i> gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges–Lehman 4.29; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges–Lehman 0.003; <i>p</i> = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"46 5","pages":"910-917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variant-specific BCR::ABL1 quantification discrepancy in chronic myeloid leukemia\",\"authors\":\"Koen Jacobs, Alena Moerman, Karl Vandepoele, Tim Van den Abeele, Katrien De Mulder, Eva Steel, Maxim Clauwaert, Henk Louagie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accurate quantification of the <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by <i>BCR::ABL1</i> can vary in size, depending on the <i>BCR</i> and/or <i>ABL1</i> gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges–Lehman 4.29; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges–Lehman 0.003; <i>p</i> = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"910-917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14320\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variant-specific BCR::ABL1 quantification discrepancy in chronic myeloid leukemia
Introduction
Accurate quantification of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by BCR::ABL1 can vary in size, depending on the BCR and/or ABL1 gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 BCR::ABL1 fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.
Methods
Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.
Results
qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges–Lehman 4.29; p < 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges–Lehman 0.003; p = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.
Conclusion
Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology.
The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence.
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines.
The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.