系统性红斑狼疮的患者报告结果和医疗资源利用率:疾病活动的影响

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zahi Touma, Karen H. Costenbader, Ben Hoskin, Christian Atkinson, David Bell, James Pike, Pamela Berry, Chetan S. Karyekar
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮的患者报告结果和医疗资源利用率:疾病活动的影响","authors":"Zahi Touma, Karen H. Costenbader, Ben Hoskin, Christian Atkinson, David Bell, James Pike, Pamela Berry, Chetan S. Karyekar","doi":"10.1186/s41927-023-00355-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited real-world data exists on clinical outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), hereafter, SLEDAI. We aimed to examine the association between SLEDAI score and clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists from the United States of America and Europe provided real-world demographic, clinical, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data for SLE patients. Patients provided self-reported outcome data, capturing their general health status using the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), health-related quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and work productivity using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Low disease activity was defined as SLEDAI score ≤ 4 and ≤ 7.5 mg/day glucocorticoids; patients not meeting these criteria were considered to have “higher” active disease. Data were compared between patients with low and higher disease activity. Logistic regression estimated a propensity score for SLE based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score matched analyses compared HCRU, patient-reported outcomes, income loss and treatment satisfaction in patients with low disease activity versus higher active disease. Data from 296 physicians reporting on 730 patients (46 low disease activity, 684 higher active disease), and from 377 patients’ self-reported questionnaires (24 low disease activity, 353 higher active disease) were analyzed. Flaring in the previous 12 months was 2.6-fold more common among patients with higher versus low active disease. Equation 5D-3 L utility index was 0.79 and 0.88 and FACIT-Fatigue scores were 34.78 and 39.79 in low versus higher active disease patients, respectively, indicating better health and less fatigue, among patients with low versus higher active disease. Absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and total activity impairment were 47.0-, 2.0-, 2.6- and 1.5-fold greater in patients with higher versus low disease activity. In the previous 12 months there were 28% more healthcare consultations and 3.4-fold more patients hospitalized in patients with higher versus low disease activity. Compared to SLE patients with higher active disease, patients with low disease activity experienced better health status, lower HCRU, less fatigue, and lower work productivity impairment, with work absenteeism being substantially lower in these patients.","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in systemic lupus erythematosus: impact of disease activity\",\"authors\":\"Zahi Touma, Karen H. Costenbader, Ben Hoskin, Christian Atkinson, David Bell, James Pike, Pamela Berry, Chetan S. Karyekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41927-023-00355-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Limited real-world data exists on clinical outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), hereafter, SLEDAI. We aimed to examine the association between SLEDAI score and clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists from the United States of America and Europe provided real-world demographic, clinical, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data for SLE patients. Patients provided self-reported outcome data, capturing their general health status using the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), health-related quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and work productivity using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Low disease activity was defined as SLEDAI score ≤ 4 and ≤ 7.5 mg/day glucocorticoids; patients not meeting these criteria were considered to have “higher” active disease. Data were compared between patients with low and higher disease activity. Logistic regression estimated a propensity score for SLE based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score matched analyses compared HCRU, patient-reported outcomes, income loss and treatment satisfaction in patients with low disease activity versus higher active disease. Data from 296 physicians reporting on 730 patients (46 low disease activity, 684 higher active disease), and from 377 patients’ self-reported questionnaires (24 low disease activity, 353 higher active disease) were analyzed. Flaring in the previous 12 months was 2.6-fold more common among patients with higher versus low active disease. Equation 5D-3 L utility index was 0.79 and 0.88 and FACIT-Fatigue scores were 34.78 and 39.79 in low versus higher active disease patients, respectively, indicating better health and less fatigue, among patients with low versus higher active disease. Absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and total activity impairment were 47.0-, 2.0-, 2.6- and 1.5-fold greater in patients with higher versus low disease activity. In the previous 12 months there were 28% more healthcare consultations and 3.4-fold more patients hospitalized in patients with higher versus low disease activity. Compared to SLE patients with higher active disease, patients with low disease activity experienced better health status, lower HCRU, less fatigue, and lower work productivity impairment, with work absenteeism being substantially lower in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00355-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00355-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数 2000(SLEDAI-2 K)(以下简称 SLEDAI)得出的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者临床疗效的真实世界数据有限。我们的目的是研究 SLEDAI 评分与系统性红斑狼疮患者的临床、患者报告和经济效益之间的关联。来自美国和欧洲的风湿病专家为系统性红斑狼疮患者提供了真实世界的人口、临床和医疗资源利用(HCRU)数据。患者提供了自我报告的结果数据,其中包括使用 EuroQol 5 维 3 级问卷(EQ-5D-3 L)记录的一般健康状况、使用慢性疾病治疗功能评估(FACIT)记录的与健康相关的生活质量,以及使用工作效率和活动障碍问卷(WPAI)记录的工作效率。低疾病活动度的定义是 SLEDAI 评分≤ 4 分且糖皮质激素≤ 7.5 毫克/天;不符合这些标准的患者被视为 "较高 "活动度。对低度和高度疾病活动患者的数据进行了比较。逻辑回归根据人口统计学和临床特征估算出系统性红斑狼疮的倾向得分。倾向得分匹配分析比较了疾病活动度低和疾病活动度高患者的 HCRU、患者报告的结果、收入损失和治疗满意度。分析了 296 名医生对 730 名患者(46 名疾病活动度低,684 名疾病活动度高)的报告数据,以及 377 名患者(24 名疾病活动度低,353 名疾病活动度高)的自我报告问卷数据。疾病活动度较高的患者与疾病活动度较低的患者相比,前 12 个月出现哮鸣音的比例高出 2.6 倍。等式 5D-3 L 实用指数在低活动性和高活动性患者中分别为 0.79 和 0.88,FACIT-疲劳评分分别为 34.78 和 39.79,这表明低活动性和高活动性患者的健康状况更好,疲劳程度更低。疾病活动度高的患者与疾病活动度低的患者相比,缺勤率、缺勤率、总体工作受损程度和总体活动受损程度分别高出 47.0 倍、2.0 倍、2.6 倍和 1.5 倍。在过去的12个月中,疾病活动度高的患者接受的医疗咨询比疾病活动度低的患者多28%,住院治疗的患者比疾病活动度低的患者多3.4倍。与疾病活动度较高的系统性红斑狼疮患者相比,疾病活动度低的患者的健康状况更好、HCRU 更低、疲劳更少、工作效率受损更低,缺勤率也大大降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in systemic lupus erythematosus: impact of disease activity
Limited real-world data exists on clinical outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), hereafter, SLEDAI. We aimed to examine the association between SLEDAI score and clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists from the United States of America and Europe provided real-world demographic, clinical, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data for SLE patients. Patients provided self-reported outcome data, capturing their general health status using the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), health-related quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) and work productivity using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Low disease activity was defined as SLEDAI score ≤ 4 and ≤ 7.5 mg/day glucocorticoids; patients not meeting these criteria were considered to have “higher” active disease. Data were compared between patients with low and higher disease activity. Logistic regression estimated a propensity score for SLE based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score matched analyses compared HCRU, patient-reported outcomes, income loss and treatment satisfaction in patients with low disease activity versus higher active disease. Data from 296 physicians reporting on 730 patients (46 low disease activity, 684 higher active disease), and from 377 patients’ self-reported questionnaires (24 low disease activity, 353 higher active disease) were analyzed. Flaring in the previous 12 months was 2.6-fold more common among patients with higher versus low active disease. Equation 5D-3 L utility index was 0.79 and 0.88 and FACIT-Fatigue scores were 34.78 and 39.79 in low versus higher active disease patients, respectively, indicating better health and less fatigue, among patients with low versus higher active disease. Absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and total activity impairment were 47.0-, 2.0-, 2.6- and 1.5-fold greater in patients with higher versus low disease activity. In the previous 12 months there were 28% more healthcare consultations and 3.4-fold more patients hospitalized in patients with higher versus low disease activity. Compared to SLE patients with higher active disease, patients with low disease activity experienced better health status, lower HCRU, less fatigue, and lower work productivity impairment, with work absenteeism being substantially lower in these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信