未实现的目标?包容性领导作用的量表开发和模型检验

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon, Allyson A. McKenzie-James, Jesse R. Caylor, Alexandria Redmond, Dan Nguyen, Phylicia Richardson
{"title":"未实现的目标?包容性领导作用的量表开发和模型检验","authors":"Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon, Allyson A. McKenzie-James, Jesse R. Caylor, Alexandria Redmond, Dan Nguyen, Phylicia Richardson","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a lack of evidence on whether inclusive leadership (IL) truly fosters inclusion for those in historically marginalized groups. Further, a conceptually up-to-date and practically useful measure of IL is lacking. Thus, in two separate phases, we first present a newly developed measure of IL and then test an empirical model. In Phase 1, results from five demographically diverse samples demonstrate reliability and validity evidence of a 10-item IL scale. In Phase 2, use this scale to examine how IL may support members of historically marginalized groups by fostering (a) interpersonal behaviors that uphold inclusive work environments (allyship, antiracism) and (b) individual experiences of inclusion (workgroup inclusion, authenticity). Path analysis results from a multi-wave study support the influence of IL on these outcomes and also demonstrate support for IL’s indirect effects on outcomes that may be disproportionately high (emotional exhaustion) and low (empowerment) for members of marginalized groups. Moderation analyses reveal many of the hypothesized relationships are similar across groups representing marginalized identities on the bases of race, sex, and the intersection of race and sex. These results add evidence to the importance of IL for fostering inclusive workplaces, especially for those who face the greatest barriers to inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Unmet goal? A Scale Development and Model test of the role of Inclusive Leadership\",\"authors\":\"Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon, Allyson A. McKenzie-James, Jesse R. Caylor, Alexandria Redmond, Dan Nguyen, Phylicia Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a lack of evidence on whether inclusive leadership (IL) truly fosters inclusion for those in historically marginalized groups. Further, a conceptually up-to-date and practically useful measure of IL is lacking. Thus, in two separate phases, we first present a newly developed measure of IL and then test an empirical model. In Phase 1, results from five demographically diverse samples demonstrate reliability and validity evidence of a 10-item IL scale. In Phase 2, use this scale to examine how IL may support members of historically marginalized groups by fostering (a) interpersonal behaviors that uphold inclusive work environments (allyship, antiracism) and (b) individual experiences of inclusion (workgroup inclusion, authenticity). Path analysis results from a multi-wave study support the influence of IL on these outcomes and also demonstrate support for IL’s indirect effects on outcomes that may be disproportionately high (emotional exhaustion) and low (empowerment) for members of marginalized groups. Moderation analyses reveal many of the hypothesized relationships are similar across groups representing marginalized identities on the bases of race, sex, and the intersection of race and sex. These results add evidence to the importance of IL for fostering inclusive workplaces, especially for those who face the greatest barriers to inclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于全纳领导(IL)是否真正促进了历史上被边缘化群体的全纳,目前还缺乏证据。此外,对包容性领导力也缺乏一个概念上与时俱进、实际有用的衡量标准。因此,我们分两个阶段,首先提出了新开发的包容性领导力衡量标准,然后测试了一个实证模型。在第一阶段,来自五个不同人口统计学样本的结果证明了由 10 个项目组成的 IL 量表的可靠性和有效性。在第二阶段,使用该量表研究 IL 如何通过促进(a)维护包容性工作环境的人际行为(同盟关系、反种族主义)和(b)个人的包容性体验(工作组包容性、真实性)来支持历史上被边缘化的群体成员。一项多波研究的路径分析结果表明了 IL 对这些结果的影响,同时也证明了 IL 对边缘化群体成员可能过高(情绪衰竭)和过低(赋权)的结果的间接影响。调节分析表明,许多假设的关系在基于种族、性别以及种族与性别交叉的边缘化身份的群体中是相似的。这些结果进一步证明了 IL 对于促进包容性工作场所的重要性,尤其是对于那些面临最大包容性障碍的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Unmet goal? A Scale Development and Model test of the role of Inclusive Leadership

An Unmet goal? A Scale Development and Model test of the role of Inclusive Leadership

There is a lack of evidence on whether inclusive leadership (IL) truly fosters inclusion for those in historically marginalized groups. Further, a conceptually up-to-date and practically useful measure of IL is lacking. Thus, in two separate phases, we first present a newly developed measure of IL and then test an empirical model. In Phase 1, results from five demographically diverse samples demonstrate reliability and validity evidence of a 10-item IL scale. In Phase 2, use this scale to examine how IL may support members of historically marginalized groups by fostering (a) interpersonal behaviors that uphold inclusive work environments (allyship, antiracism) and (b) individual experiences of inclusion (workgroup inclusion, authenticity). Path analysis results from a multi-wave study support the influence of IL on these outcomes and also demonstrate support for IL’s indirect effects on outcomes that may be disproportionately high (emotional exhaustion) and low (empowerment) for members of marginalized groups. Moderation analyses reveal many of the hypothesized relationships are similar across groups representing marginalized identities on the bases of race, sex, and the intersection of race and sex. These results add evidence to the importance of IL for fostering inclusive workplaces, especially for those who face the greatest barriers to inclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信