机器人辅助是否有助于全膝关节置换术中的骨保存？

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01126-2

S. S. Varun Roheet, Arun Kannan

{"title":"机器人辅助是否有助于全膝关节置换术中的骨保存？","authors":"S. S. Varun Roheet, Arun Kannan","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01126-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>This research paper investigates whether robotic total knee replacement (TKR) reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR. While TKR is a successful procedure, revision surgery remains a challenge with up to 8.3% of all knee replacement procedures requiring revisions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>The study retrospectively analyzed the tibial polyethylene inserts used and bone cuts made in 157 primary TKRs performed by a single surgeon. The results show that 93.3% of robotic TKRs used the base size tibial polyethylene of 9 mm, and the average distal femoral cut was 7.4 mm and the average tibial cut was 6.4 mm, with the minimum being 3 mm.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The study suggests that robotic TKR reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Robotic Assistance Help with Bone Preservation in Total Knee Replacement?\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Varun Roheet, Arun Kannan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01126-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>This research paper investigates whether robotic total knee replacement (TKR) reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR. While TKR is a successful procedure, revision surgery remains a challenge with up to 8.3% of all knee replacement procedures requiring revisions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and methods</h3><p>The study retrospectively analyzed the tibial polyethylene inserts used and bone cuts made in 157 primary TKRs performed by a single surgeon. The results show that 93.3% of robotic TKRs used the base size tibial polyethylene of 9 mm, and the average distal femoral cut was 7.4 mm and the average tibial cut was 6.4 mm, with the minimum being 3 mm.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The study suggests that robotic TKR reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01126-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01126-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

导言本文研究了机器人全膝关节置换术（TKR）与传统 TKR 相比是否减少了骨切除。虽然 TKR 是一种成功的手术，但翻修手术仍是一项挑战，在所有膝关节置换手术中，高达 8.3% 的手术需要翻修。材料和方法该研究回顾性分析了由单个外科医生实施的 157 例初次 TKR 中使用的胫骨聚乙烯插入物和骨切口。结果显示，93.3% 的机器人 TKR 使用的胫骨聚乙烯的基本尺寸为 9 毫米，股骨远端切口平均为 7.4 毫米，胫骨切口平均为 6.4 毫米，最小为 3 毫米。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Does Robotic Assistance Help with Bone Preservation in Total Knee Replacement?

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does Robotic Assistance Help with Bone Preservation in Total Knee Replacement?

Introduction

This research paper investigates whether robotic total knee replacement (TKR) reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR. While TKR is a successful procedure, revision surgery remains a challenge with up to 8.3% of all knee replacement procedures requiring revisions.

Materials and methods

The study retrospectively analyzed the tibial polyethylene inserts used and bone cuts made in 157 primary TKRs performed by a single surgeon. The results show that 93.3% of robotic TKRs used the base size tibial polyethylene of 9 mm, and the average distal femoral cut was 7.4 mm and the average tibial cut was 6.4 mm, with the minimum being 3 mm.

Conclusion

The study suggests that robotic TKR reduces bone resection compared to conventional TKR.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

185

审稿时长

9 months

期刊介绍： IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.