植树造林计划对新西兰地区部门二氧化碳排放的影响

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Saeed Solaymani, Andrew Dunningham
{"title":"植树造林计划对新西兰地区部门二氧化碳排放的影响","authors":"Saeed Solaymani, Andrew Dunningham","doi":"10.1007/s11676-024-01748-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Investing in projects that support environmental benefits, such as tree harvesting, has the potential to reduce air pollution levels in the atmosphere in the future. However, this kind of investment may increase the current level of emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate how much the policy affects the current level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This makes sure the policy doesn’t increase the level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This study aims to analyze the effect of the One Billion Trees program on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in New Zealand by employing the 2020 input–output table analysis. This investigation examines the direct and indirect effects of policy on both the demand and supply sides across six regions of New Zealand. The results of this study for the first year of plantation suggest that the policy increases the level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in all regions, especially in the Waikato region. The direct and indirect impact of the policy leads to 64 kt of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions on the demand side and 270 kt of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions on the supply side. These lead to 0.19 and 0.74% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions being attributed to investment shocks. Continuing the policy is recommended, as it has a low effect on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, it is crucial to prioritize the use of low-carbon machinery that uses fossil fuels during the plantation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":15830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forestry Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of forest plantation programs on sectoral CO2 emissions regionally in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Solaymani, Andrew Dunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11676-024-01748-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Investing in projects that support environmental benefits, such as tree harvesting, has the potential to reduce air pollution levels in the atmosphere in the future. However, this kind of investment may increase the current level of emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate how much the policy affects the current level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This makes sure the policy doesn’t increase the level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This study aims to analyze the effect of the One Billion Trees program on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in New Zealand by employing the 2020 input–output table analysis. This investigation examines the direct and indirect effects of policy on both the demand and supply sides across six regions of New Zealand. The results of this study for the first year of plantation suggest that the policy increases the level of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in all regions, especially in the Waikato region. The direct and indirect impact of the policy leads to 64 kt of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions on the demand side and 270 kt of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions on the supply side. These lead to 0.19 and 0.74% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions being attributed to investment shocks. Continuing the policy is recommended, as it has a low effect on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, it is crucial to prioritize the use of low-carbon machinery that uses fossil fuels during the plantation process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forestry Research\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forestry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01748-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01748-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投资于支持环境效益的项目,如树木采伐,有可能降低未来大气中的空气污染水平。然而,这种投资可能会增加当前的排放水平。因此,有必要估算该政策对当前二氧化碳排放水平的影响程度。这样才能确保政策不会增加二氧化碳排放量。本研究旨在采用 2020 年投入产出表分析法,分析 "十亿棵树 "计划对新西兰二氧化碳排放的影响。这项调查研究了政策对新西兰六个地区供需双方的直接和间接影响。对种植第一年的研究结果表明,该政策增加了所有地区的二氧化碳排放量,尤其是怀卡托地区。该政策的直接和间接影响导致需求方排放了 64 千吨二氧化碳,供应方排放了 270 千吨二氧化碳。这导致 0.19% 和 0.74% 的二氧化碳总排放量归因于投资冲击。建议继续实施该政策,因为它对二氧化碳排放的影响较小。然而,在种植过程中优先使用使用化石燃料的低碳机械至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impacts of forest plantation programs on sectoral CO2 emissions regionally in New Zealand

Impacts of forest plantation programs on sectoral CO2 emissions regionally in New Zealand

Investing in projects that support environmental benefits, such as tree harvesting, has the potential to reduce air pollution levels in the atmosphere in the future. However, this kind of investment may increase the current level of emissions. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate how much the policy affects the current level of CO2 emissions. This makes sure the policy doesn’t increase the level of CO2 emissions. This study aims to analyze the effect of the One Billion Trees program on CO2 emissions in New Zealand by employing the 2020 input–output table analysis. This investigation examines the direct and indirect effects of policy on both the demand and supply sides across six regions of New Zealand. The results of this study for the first year of plantation suggest that the policy increases the level of CO2 emissions in all regions, especially in the Waikato region. The direct and indirect impact of the policy leads to 64 kt of CO2 emissions on the demand side and 270 kt of CO2 emissions on the supply side. These lead to 0.19 and 0.74% of total CO2 emissions being attributed to investment shocks. Continuing the policy is recommended, as it has a low effect on CO2 emissions. However, it is crucial to prioritize the use of low-carbon machinery that uses fossil fuels during the plantation process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
2538
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forestry Research (JFR), founded in 1990, is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal in English. JFR has rapidly emerged as an international journal published by Northeast Forestry University and Ecological Society of China in collaboration with Springer Verlag. The journal publishes scientific articles related to forestry for a broad range of international scientists, forest managers and practitioners.The scope of the journal covers the following five thematic categories and 20 subjects: Basic Science of Forestry, Forest biometrics, Forest soils, Forest hydrology, Tree physiology, Forest biomass, carbon, and bioenergy, Forest biotechnology and molecular biology, Forest Ecology, Forest ecology, Forest ecological services, Restoration ecology, Forest adaptation to climate change, Wildlife ecology and management, Silviculture and Forest Management, Forest genetics and tree breeding, Silviculture, Forest RS, GIS, and modeling, Forest management, Forest Protection, Forest entomology and pathology, Forest fire, Forest resources conservation, Forest health monitoring and assessment, Wood Science and Technology, Wood Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信